Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 3–20 | Cite as

Assessment of observational networks with the Representer Matrix Spectra method—application to a 3D coastal model of the Bay of Biscay

  • Matthieu Le Hénaff
  • Pierre De Mey
  • Patrick Marsaleix
Special Issue


The development of coastal ocean modeling in the recent years has allowed an improved representation of the associated complex physics. Such models have become more realistic, to the point that they can now be used to design observation networks in coastal areas, with the idea that a “good” network is a network that controls model state error. To test this ability without performing data assimilation, we set up a technique called Representer Matrix Spectra (RMS) technique that combines the model state and observation error covariance matrices into a single scaled representer matrix. Examination of the spectrum and the eigenvectors of that matrix informs us on which model state error modes a network can detect and constrain amidst the observation error background. We applied our technique to a 3D coastal model in the Bay of Biscay, with a focus on mesoscale activity, and tested the performance of various altimetry networks and an in situ array deployment strategy. It appears that a single nadir altimeter is not efficient enough at capturing coastal mesoscale physics, while a wide swath altimeter would do a much better job. Testing various local in situ array configurations confirms that adding a current meter to a vertical temperature measurement array improves the detection of secondary variability modes, while shifting the array higher on the shelf break would obviously enhance the model constraint along the coast. The RMS technique is easily set up and used as a “black box,” but the utility of its results is maximized by previous knowledge of model state error physics. The technique provides both quantitative (eigenvalues) and qualitative (eigenvectors) tools to study and compare various network options. The qualitative approach is essential to discard possibly inconsistent modes.


Stochastic modeling Model errors Data assimilation Array design Coastal ocean 



We thank MERCATOR, a GODAE-participating system, for providing the model boundary data used in the nesting. Most of the work was conducted during Matthieu Le Hénaff’s Ph.D. thesis, for which a grant from DGA is gratefully acknowledged. This project also benefited from interactions within the MERSEA and ECOOP European projects, and (in the case of nadir and wide-swath altimetry) within the CNES/NASA OST and SWOT communities. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive remarks.


  1. Alsdorf DE, Rodríguez E, Lettenmaier DP (2007) Measuring surface water from space. Rev Geophys 45:RG2002, doi:10.1029/2006RG000197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzenhofer M, Shum CK, Rentsh M (1999) Coastal altimetry and applications. Tech. Rep. n. 464, Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University Columbus, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Arhan M, Colin de Verdière A, Mémery L (1994) The eastern boundary of the subtropical North Atlantic. J Phys Oceanogr 24:1295–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auclair F, Marsaleix P, De Mey P (2003) Space-time structure and dynamics of the forecast error in a coastal circulation model of the Gulf of Lions. Dyn Atmos Ocean 36:309–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auclair F, Estournel C, Marsaleix P, Pairaud I (2006) On coastal ocean embedded modeling. Geophys Res Lett 33:L14602, doi:10.1029/2006GL026099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardey P, Garnesson P, Moussu G, Wald L (1999) Joint analysis of temperature and ocean colour satellite images for mesoscale activities in the Gulf of Biscay. Int J Remote Sensing 20:1329–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barth N (1991) Oceanic experiment design II: genetic algorithms. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 9:434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barth N, Wunsch C (1990) Oceanographic experiment design by simulated annealing. J Phys Oceanogr 20:1249–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett AF (1985) Array Design by Inverse Methods. Prog Oceanogr 15:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett AF (1990) Inverse methods for assessing ship-of-opportunity networks and estimating circulation and winds from tropical expendable bathythermograph data. J Geophys Res 95:16111–16148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouffard J, Vignudelli S, Cipollini P, Menard Y (2008) Exploiting the potential of an improved multimission altimetric data set over the coastal ocean. Geophys Res Lett 35:L10601, doi:10.1029/2008GL033488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrère L, Lyard F (2003) Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing—comparisons with observations. Geophys Res Lett 30(6):1275, doi:10.1029/2002GL016473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chelton DB, DeSzoeke RA, Schlax MG, Naggar KE, Siwertz N (1998) Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation. J Phys Oceanogr 28:433–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evensen G (1994) Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res 99(C5):10143–10162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu L (2003) Wide-swath altimetric measurement of ocean surface topography. Report Jet Propul. Lab, Pasadena, CA, 67Google Scholar
  16. Garcia-Soto C, Pingree RD, Valdés L (2002) Navidad development in the southern Bay of Biscay: Climate change and swoddy structure from remote sensing and in situ measurements. J Geophys Res 107(C8):3118, doi:10.1029/2001JC001012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guinehut S, Larnicol G, Le Traon P-Y (2002) Design of an array of profiling floats in the North Atlantic from model simulations. J Mar Syst 35:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hackert EC, Miller RN, Busalacchi AJ (1998) An optimized design for a moored instrument array in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res 103(C4):7491–7510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernandez F, Le Traon P-Y, Barth NH (1995) Optimizing a drifter cast strategy with a Genetic Algorithm. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 12:330–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurapov AL, Allen JS, Egbert GD, Miller RN, Kosro PM, Levine MD, Boyd T, Barth JA (2005) Assimilation of moored velocity data in a model of coastal wind-driven circulation off Oregon: Multivariate capabilities. J Geophys Res 110:C10S08, doi:10.1029/2004JC002493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Hénaff M, De Mey P, Mourre B, Le Traon P-Y (2008) Contribution of a wide-swath altimeter in a shelf seas assimilation system – Impact of the satellite roll errors. J Atmos Oceanic Technol (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Le Traon P-Y, Ogor F (1998) ERS-1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2 cm challenge. J Geophys Res 103(C4):8045–8058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsaleix P, Auclair F, Floor JW, Herrmann MJ, Estournel C, Pairaud I, Ulses C (2008) Energy conservation issues in sigma-coordinate free-surface ocean models. Ocean Model 20:61–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McIntosh PC (1987) Systematic Design of Observational Arrays. J Phys Oceanogr 17:885–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mourre B, De Mey P, Menard Y, Lyard F, Le Provost C (2006) Relative performance of future altimeter systems and tide gauges in constraining a model of North Sea high-frequency barotropic dynamics. Ocean Dynamics 56:473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pingree RD (1993) Flow of surface waters to the west of the British Isles and in the Bay of Biscay. Deep-Sea Res 40B:369–388Google Scholar
  27. Pingree RD, Le Cann B (1989) Celtic and Armorican slope and shelf residual currents. Prog Oceanogr 23:303–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pingree RD, Le Cann B (1990) Structure, strength and seasonality of the slope currents in the vicinity of the Bay of Biscay region. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 70:857–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pingree R, Le Cann B (1992a) Three anticyclonic slope water oceanic eddies (SWODDIES) in the southern Bay of Biscay in 1990. Deep-Sea Res 39:1147–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pingree R, Le Cann B (1992b) Anticyclonic eddy X91 in the southern Bay of Biscay, May 1991 to February 1992. J Geophys Res 97:14353–14367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raicich F (2006) The assessment of temperature and salinity sampling strategies in the Mediterranean Sea: idealized and real cases. Ocean Sci 2:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roblou L, Lyard F, Le Hénaff M, Maraldi C (2007) X-track, a new processing tool for altimetry in coastal oceans, ESA ENVISAT Symposium, Montreux, Switzerland, April 23–27, 2007, ESA SP-636, July 2007Google Scholar
  33. Schiller A, Wijffels SE, Meyers GA (2004) Design requirements for an Argo float array in the Indian Ocean inferred from observing system simulation experiments. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 21:1598–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toumazou V, Crétaux JF (2001) Using a Langczos eigensolver in the computation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon Weather Rev 129:1243–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Aken HM (2000) The hydrography of the mid-latitude Northeast Atlantic Ocean: II, The intermediate water masses. Deep-Sea Res 47A:789–824Google Scholar
  36. van Aken HM (2001) The hydrography of the mid-latitude Northeast Atlantic Ocean: Part III. The subducted thermocline water mass. Deep-Sea Res 48A:237–267Google Scholar
  37. van Aken HM (2002) Surface currents in the Bay of Biscay as observed with drifters between 1995 and 1999. Deep-Sea Res 49A:1071–1086Google Scholar
  38. Vignudelli S, Cipollini P, Roblou L, Lyard F, Gasparini GP, Manzella GRM, Astraldi M (2005) Improved satellite altimetry in coastal systems: Case study of the Corsica Channel (Mediterranean Sea). Geophys Res Let 32:L07608, doi:1029/2005GL22602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthieu Le Hénaff
    • 1
  • Pierre De Mey
    • 1
  • Patrick Marsaleix
    • 2
  1. 1.LEGOSUniversité de Toulouse/CNRSToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’AérologieToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations