Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 57, Issue 4–5, pp 269–285

The impact of freshwater discharges on the ocean circulation in the Skagerrak/northern North Sea area Part I: model validation

Article

Abstract

We assess the performance of an eddy-recognizing numerical ocean model in simulating the pattern and variability of the hydrography in the Skagerrak/northern North Sea area. The model we use is a version of the widely used Princeton ocean model employing a terrain-following vertical coordinate. Results from a series of five multi-year simulations of the mesoscale response are described. The simulations differ in their representation of the lateral freshwater supply to the model ocean of which the first is a reference simulation. The next four are variations in which the river discharges and/or the Baltic outflow are given more realistic representations. For validation, we have used in situ hydrographic data. A novelty is that we use the concepts of freshwater height and potential energy anomaly as objective validation tools. We find that, in general, the model faithfully reproduces many of the observed hydrographic features including their mean patterns and their variance. Not surprisingly, we find that the Baltic outflow is by far the most significant freshwater source in terms of its influence on the hydrography in the area, a result corroborating earlier findings. The best validation is obtained when all freshwater supply is made as realistic as possible, in particular the Baltic outflow. We also find that the large scale cyclonic circulation and the location of fronts are robust characteristics of the Skagerrak/northern North Sea circulation given the impact changes in the freshwater input has on the hydrography. Finally, we find that a further exploration of the impact of the lateral open boundary forcing, e.g., the input of Atlantic water, is needed.

Keywords

Hydrography Validation River runoff Skagerrak 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albretsen J (2007) The impact of freshwater discharges on the ocean circulation in the Skagerrak/northern North Sea area. Part II: Energy analysis, (this volume)Google Scholar
  2. Albretsen J, Røed LP (2006) Sensitivity of Skagerrak dynamics to freshwater discharges: insight from a numerical model. In: Dahlin H, Flemming NC, Marchand P, Petersson SE (eds) Operational oceanography: present and future. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on EuroGOOS, 6–9 June 2005, Brest, France, pp 773–779, EuroGOOS Office, SMHI, and European Commission Research DirectorateGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrøm S, Carlsson B (1994) River runoff to the Baltic Sea: 1950–1990. Ambio 23:280–287Google Scholar
  4. Berntsen J, Svendsen E (1999) Using the SKAGEX dataset for evaluation of ocean model skills. J Mar Syst 18:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berntsen J, Svendsen E, Ostrowski M (1966) Validation and sensitivity study of a sigma-coordinate ocean model using the Skagex dataset. ICES CM 1996/C:5Google Scholar
  6. Björk G, Gustafsson B, Stigebrandt S (2001) Upper layer circulation of the Nordic Seas as inferred from the spatial distribution of heat and freshwater content and potential energy. Polar Res 20:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumberg AF, Mellor GL (1987) A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. In: Heaps N (ed) Three-dimensional coastal ocean models, vol 4. Coastal and Estuarine Sciences, American Geophys, UnionGoogle Scholar
  8. Curry R, Mauritzen C (2005) Dilution of the northern North Atlantic Ocean in recent decades. Science 308:1772–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curry R, McCartney MS (2001) Ocean gyre circulation changes associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Phys Oceanogr 31:3374–3400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danielsen DS, Davidson L, Edler L, Fogelqvist E, Fonselius S, Føyn L, Hernroth L, Håkansson B, Olsson I, Svendsen E (1991) SKAGEX: some preliminary results. In: ICES Statuary Meeting, C.M./C:2Google Scholar
  11. Danielsen DS, Edler L, Fonselius S, Hernroth L, Ostrowski M, Svendsen E (1997) Oceanographic variability in Skagerrak/northern Kattegat, May–June 1990. ICES J Mar Sci 55:753–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engedahl H (1995) Implementation of the Princeton ocean model (POM/ECOM-3D) at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute (DNMI). Research Report 5, Norwegian Meteorological InstituteGoogle Scholar
  13. Engedahl H, Ådlandsvik B, Martinsen EA (1998) Production of monthly mean climatological archives for the Nordic Seas. J Mar Sys 14:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flather RA (1981) Results from a model of the north-east Atlantic relating to the Norwegian coastal current. In: Sætre R, Mork M (eds) Norwegian coastal current symposium vol II. University of Bergen, p 31Google Scholar
  15. Fofonoff NP (1962) Dynamics of ocean currents. In: Hill NM (ed) The Sea: ideas and observations on progress in the study of the sea, vol 1. Wiley, pp 323–395Google Scholar
  16. Fossum I (2006) Analysis of instabilities and mesoscale motion off southern Norway. J Geophys Res 111. doi:10.1029/2005JC003228
  17. Gjevik B, Nøst E, Straume T (1990) Atlas of tides on the Shelves of the Norwegian and Barents Seas. Tech. Rep. F&U-ST 90012 Statoil, Department of Mathematics, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustafsson B (1997) Interaction between Baltic Sea and North Sea. D. Hydrogr Zeit 49:163–181Google Scholar
  19. Gustafsson B (1999) High frequency variability of the surface layers in the Skagerrak during SKAGEX. Cont Shelf Res 19:1021–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gustafsson B, Andersson HC (2001) Modeling the exchange of the Baltic Sea from the meridional atmospheric pressure difference across the North Sea. J Geophys Res 106:19, 731–19,744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gustafsson B, Stigebrandt A (1996) Dynamics of the freshwater-influenced surface layers in the Skagerrak. J Sea Res 35:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ikeda M, Johannessen J, Lygre K, Sandven S (1989) A process study of mesoscale meanders and eddies in the Norwegian Coastal Current: J Phys Oceanogr 19:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James I (1991) A primitive equation model simulation of eddies in the Norwegian Coastal Current. J Phys Oceanogr 21:893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johannessen J, Svendsen E, Sandven S, Johannessen OM, Lygre K (1989) 3-dimensional structure of mesoscale eddies in the Norwegian Coastal Current. J Phys Oceanogr 19:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johannessen OM, Mork M (1979) Remote sensing experiments in the Norwegian coastal waters. Tech. Rep. Report No. 3/9, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  26. LaCasce J, Engedahl H (2005) Statistics of low frequency currents over the western Norwegian shelf and slope II: Model. Ocean Dyn 55:222–237. doi:10.1007/s10,236–005–0022–5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langenberg H (1998) Features of coastal current instabilities in the North Sea: results of a numerical model. J Geophys Res 103:7681–7691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinsen EA, Engedahl H, Ottersen G, Ådlandsvik B, Loeng H, Balino B (1992) Metocean modeling project: climatological and hydrographical data for hindcast of ocean currents, Tech. Rep. 100 Norwegian Meteorological InstituteGoogle Scholar
  29. Mattson J (1996) Some comments on the barotropic flow through the Danish straits and the division of the flow between the belt sea and Øresund. Tellus 48:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melsom A (2005) Mesoscale activity in the North Sea as seen in ensemble simulations. Ocean Dyn 55:338–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Omstedt A, Meuller L, Nyberg L (1997) Interannual, seasonal and regional variations of precipitation and evaporation over the Baltic Sea. Ambio 26:484–492Google Scholar
  32. Rodhe J (1987) The large-scale circulation in the Skagerrak, interpretation of some observations. Tellus 39A:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodhe J (1996) On the dynamics of the large-scale circulation of the Skagerrak. J Sea Res 35:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodhe J, Tett P, Wulff F (2006) The Baltic and North Seas: a regional review of some important physical–chemical–biological interaction processes. In: Robinson AR, Brink K (eds) The sea, vol 14. Harvard Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Røed LP, Debernard J (2004) Description of an integrated flux and sea-ice model suitable for coupling to an ocean and atmosphere model, met.no Report 4/2004, Norwegian Meteorological InstituteGoogle Scholar
  36. Røed LP, Fossum I (2004) Mean and eddy motion in the Skagerrak/northern North Sea: insight from a numerical model. Ocean Dyn 54:197–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sætre R, Mork M (eds) (1981) The Norwegian Coastal Current. In: Proceedings from the norwegian coastal current symposium, Geilo 9–12 September 1980, University of Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  38. Skogen M, Moll A (2005) Importance of ocean circulation in ecological modeling: an example from the North Sea. J Mar Syst 57:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skogen MD, Svendsen E, Søiland H (2002) Environmental status of the Skagerrak and North Sea 2000, Tech. rep., Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway. Available at http://www.imr.no/~morten/nocomments
  40. Skogen MD, Svendsen E, Søiland H (2003) Environmental status of the Skagerrak and North Sea 2001, Tech. rep., Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway. Available at http://www.imr.no/~morten/nocomments
  41. Stigebrandt A (1980) Barotropic and baroclinic response of a semi-enclosed basin to barotropic forcing of the sea. In: Freeland DF, Levings HJ, Levings C (eds) Proceedings of the NATO conference of fjord oceanography, pp 141–164Google Scholar
  42. Stigebrandt A (1983) A model for the exchange of water and salt between the Baltic and the Skagerrak. J Phys Oceanogr 13:411–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stigebrandt A (1984) Analysis of a 89-year long sea level record from the Kattegat with special reference to the barotropically driven water exchange between the Baltic and the sea. Tellus Ser A 36:411–427Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Meteorological InstituteOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations