Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 12–31

Six circumpolar currents—on the forcing of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current by wind and mixing

Original Paper


The transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) is influenced by a variety of processes and parameters. A proper implementation of basin geometry, ocean topography and baroclinicity is known to be a fundamental requisite for a realistic simulation of the circulation and transport. Other, more subtle parameters are those of eddy-induced transports and diapycnal mixing of thermohaline tracers or buoyancy, either treated by eddy resolution or by a proper parameterization. Quite a number of realistic numerical simulations of the circulation in the Southern Ocean have recently been published. Many concepts on relations of the ACC transport to model parameters and forcing function are in discussion, however, without much generality and little success. We present a series of numerical simulations of circumpolar flow with a simplified numerical model, ranging from flat-bottom wind-driven flow to baroclinic flow with realistic topography and wind and buoyancy forcing. Analysis of the balances of momentum, vorticity, and baroclinic potential energy enables us to develop a new transport theory, which combines the most important mechanisms driving the circulation of the ACC and determining its zonal transport. The theory is based on the importance of the bottom vertical velocity in generating vorticity and shaping the baroclinic potential energy of the ACC. It explains the breaking of the \(f/h\)-constraint by baroclinicity and brings together in one equation the wind and buoyancy forcing of the current. The theory emphasizes the role of Ekman pumping and eddy diffusion of buoyancy to determine the transport. It also demonstrates that eddy viscosity effects are irrelevant in the barotropic vorticity balance and that friction arises via eddy diffusion of density. In this regime, the classical Stommel model of vorticity balance is revived where the bottom friction coefficient is replaced by \(K/\lambda^2\) (with the Gent–McWilliams coefficient \(K\) and the baroclinic Rossby radius \(\lambda\)) and a modified wind curl forcing appears.


Antarctic Circumpolar Current Circumpolar flow Transport theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borowski D (2003) The Antarctic Circumpolar Current: dynamics of a circumpolar channel with blocked geostrophic contours. Ph.D. thesis, University BremenGoogle Scholar
  2. Borowski D, Gerdes R, Olbers D (2002) Thermohaline and wind forcing of a circumpolar channel with blocked geostrophic contours. J Phys Oceanogr 32:2520–2540Google Scholar
  3. Bryan K (1969) A numerical method for the study of the world ocean. J Comput Phys 4:347–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan K, Cox MD (1972) The circulation of the world ocean: a numerical study. Part I, a homogeneous model. J Phys Oceanogr 2:319–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai W, Baines PG (1996) Interactions between thermohaline- and wind-driven circulations and their relevance to the dynamics of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, in a coarse-resolution global ocean general circulation model. J Geophys Res 101:14073–14094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cane MA, Kamenkovich VM, Krupitsky A (1998) On the utility and disutility of JEBAR. J Phys Oceanogr 28:519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox MD (1975) A baroclinic numerical model of the Word Ocean: preliminary results. In: Numerical models of ocean circulation. Durham, New Hampshire, 17–20 October 1972, pp 107–120Google Scholar
  8. Gent PR, McWilliams JC (1990) Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J Phys Oceanogr 20:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gent PR, Large WG, Bryan FO (2001) What sets the mean transport through Drake Passage? J Geophys Res 106:2693–2712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gill AE (1968) A linear model of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. J Fluid Mech 32:465–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gnanadesikan A, Hallberg RW (2000) On the relationship of the circumpolar current to Southern Hemisphere winds in coarse resolution ocean models. J Phys Oceanogr 30:2013–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greatbatch RJ, Fanning AF, Goulding AD, Levitus S (1991) A diagnostic of interpentadal circulation changes in the North Atlantic. J Geophys Res 96:22009–22023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffies S (2004) Fundamentals of ocean climate models. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Han Y-J (1984a) A numerical world ocean general circulation model. Part I. Basic design and barotropic experiment. Dyn Atmos Ocean 8:107–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han Y-J (1984b) A numerical world ocean general circulation model. Part II. A baroclinic experiment. Dyn Atmos Ocean 8:141–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hidaka K, Tsuchiya M (1953) On the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. J Mar Res 12:214–222Google Scholar
  17. Holland WR (1973) Baroclinic and topographic influences on the transport in western boundary currents. Geophys Fluid Dyn 4:187–210Google Scholar
  18. Hughes CW, de Cuevas BA (2001) Why western boundary currents in realistic oceans are inviscid: a link between form stress and bottom pressure torques. J Phys Oceanogr 31:2871–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson GC, Bryden HL (1989) On the size of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Deep-Sea Res 36:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson JA, Hill RB (1975) A three-dimensional model of the southern ocean with bottom topography. Deep-Sea Res 22:745–751Google Scholar
  21. Karsten RH, Jones H, Marshall J (2002) The role of eddy transfer in setting the stratification and transport of a circumpolar current. J Phys Oceanogr 32:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klinck JM (1991) Vorticity dynamics of seasonal variations of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current from a modeling study. J Phys Oceanogr 21:1515–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krupitsky A, Cane MA (1994) On topographic pressure drag in a zonal channel. J Mar Res 52:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krupitsky A, Cane MA (1997) A two layer wind-driven ocean model in a multiply connected domain with bottom topography. J Phys Oceanogr 27:2395–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krupitsky A, Kamekovich VM, Naik N, Cane MA (1996) A linear equivalent barotropic model of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current with realistic coastline and bottom topography. J Phys Oceanogr 26:1803–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitus S, Boyer TP (1994) World ocean atlas 1994. US Department of Commerce, NOAA, NESDIS, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall J, Olbers D, Ross H, Wolf-Gladrow D (1993) Potential vorticity constraints on the dynamics and hydrography in the Southern Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 23:465–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mellor GL, Mechoso CR, Keto N (1982) A diagnostic calculation of the general circulation of the Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res 29:1171–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mertz G, Wright DG (1992) Interpretations of the JEBAR term. J Phys Oceanogr 22:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munk WH, Palmén E (1951) Note on dynamics of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Tellus 3:53–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olbers D (1998) Comment on “On the obscurantist physics of ‘form drag’ in theorizing about the circumpolar current”. J Phys Oceanogr 28:1647–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olbers D (2005) On the role of eddy mixing on the transport of zonal ocean currents. In: Baumert H, Simpson J, Sündermann J (eds) Marine turbulence: theories, observations and models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 511–529Google Scholar
  33. Olbers D, Eden C (2003) A simplified general circulation model for a baroclinic ocean with topography. Part I: theory, waves and wind-driven circulations. J Phys Oceanogr 33:2719–2737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olbers D, Ivchenko VO (2001) On the meridional circulation and balance of momentum in the Southern Ocean of POP. Ocean Dyn 52:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olbers D, Völker C (1996) Steady states and variability in oceanic zonal flows. In: Anderson DLT, Willebrand J (eds) Decadal climate variability dynamics and prediction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 407–443Google Scholar
  36. Olbers DJ, Wübber C (1991) The role of wind and buoyancy forcing of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. In: Latif M (ed) Strategies for future climate research. Max-Planck-Institut fur Meteorologie, Hamburg, pp 161–191Google Scholar
  37. Olbers DJ, Wenzel M, Willebrand J (1985) The inference of North Atlantic circulation patterns from climatological hydrographic data. Rev Geophys 23(4):313–356Google Scholar
  38. Olbers D, Wübber C, Wolff JO (1992) The dynamical balance of wind and buoyancy driven circumpolar currents. Research report 32. Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung, BremerhavenGoogle Scholar
  39. Olbers D, Borowski D, Völker C, Wolff J-O (2004) The dynamical balance, transport and circulation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Antarct Sci 16(4):439–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rhines P (1977) The dynamics of unsteady currents. In: Goldberg E (ed) The sea, vol 6. Wiley, New York, pp 189–318Google Scholar
  41. Rhines PB, Young WR (1982) A theory of the wind-driven circulation. I. Mid-ocean gyres. J Mar Res 40:559–596 (Suppl)Google Scholar
  42. Rintoul SR, Hughes C, Olbers D (2001) The Antarctic Circumpolar Current system. In: Siedler G, Church J, Gould J (eds) Ocean circulation and climate. Academic Press, New York, pp 271–302Google Scholar
  43. Sarkisyan AS, Ivanov VF (1971) Joint effect of baroclinicity and bottom relief as an important factor in the dynamics of sea currents. Akad Nauk Atmos Oceanic Phys 7(2):173–188Google Scholar
  44. Völker C (1999) Momentum balance in zonal flows and resonance of baroclinic Rossby waves. J Phys Oceanogr 29:1666–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang L, Huang RX (1995) A linear homogeneous model of wind-driven circulation in a \(\beta\)-plane channel. J Phys Oceanogr 25:587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolff J-O, Maier-Reimer E, Olbers DJ (1991) Wind-driven flow over topography in a zonal \(\beta\)-plane channel: a quasi-geostrophic model of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. J Phys Oceanogr 21(2):236–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Olbers
    • 1
  • Karsten Lettmann
    • 1
  • Ralph Timmermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations