Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 56, Issue 5–6, pp 594–606 | Cite as

Modeling studies of the upper ocean response to a tropical cyclone

  • Steven L. Morey
  • Mark A. Bourassa
  • Dmitry S. Dukhovskoy
  • James J. O’Brien
Original paper


A coupled ocean and boundary layer flux numerical modeling system is used to study the upper ocean response to surface heat and momentum fluxes associated with a major hurricane, namely, Hurricane Dennis (July 2005) in the Gulf of Mexico. A suite of experiments is run using this modeling system, constructed by coupling a Navy Coastal Ocean Model simulation of the Gulf of Mexico to an atmospheric flux model. The modeling system is forced by wind fields produced from satellite scatterometer and atmospheric model wind data, and by numerical weather prediction air temperature data. The experiments are initialized from a data assimilative hindcast model run and then forced by surface fluxes with no assimilation for the time during which Hurricane Dennis impacted the region. Four experiments are run to aid in the analysis: one is forced by heat and momentum fluxes, one by only momentum fluxes, one by only heat fluxes, and one with no surface forcing. An equation describing the change in the upper ocean hurricane heat potential due to the storm is developed. Analysis of the model results show that surface heat fluxes are primarily responsible for widespread reduction (0.5°–1.5°C) of sea surface temperature over the inner West Florida Shelf 100–300 km away from the storm center. Momentum fluxes are responsible for stronger surface cooling (2°C) near the center of the storm. The upper ocean heat loss near the storm center of more than 200 MJ/m2 is primarily due to the vertical flux of thermal energy between the surface layer and deep ocean. Heat loss to the atmosphere during the storm’s passage is approximately 100–150 MJ/m2. The upper ocean cooling is enhanced where the preexisting mixed layer is shallow, e.g., within a cyclonic circulation feature, although the heat flux to the atmosphere in these locations is markedly reduced.


Air–sea interaction Tropical cyclones Ocean modeling Air–sea fluxes 



This work was sponsored by NOAA, NASA, NSF, and the ONR Secretary of the Navy grant to J. O’Brien. The authors thank Paul Martin, Alan Wallcraft, and the NCOM development team for their assistance with the model. Computations were performed on the IBM SP4 at the Florida State University School of Computational Science.


  1. Beven J (2005) Hurricane Dennis, 4–13 July 2005. Tropical Cyclone Report, National Hurricane CenterGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourassa MA (2004) An improved seastate dependency for surface stress derived from in situ and remotely sensed winds. Adv Space Res 33:1136–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourassa MA, Vincent DG, Wood WL (1999) A flux parameterization including the effects of capillary waves and sea . J Atmos Sci 56:1123–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cione JJ, Uhlhorn EW (2003) Sea surface temperature variability in hurricanes: implications with respect to intensity change. Mon Weather Rev 131:1783–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DaSilva A, Young AC, Levitus S (1994) Atlas of surface marine data 1994, vol. 1: algorithms and procedures. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 6, U. S. Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellingsen IH (2004) Internal tides and the spread of river plumes in the Trondheim Fjord. Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox DN, Teague WJ, Barron CN, Carnes MR, Lee CM (2002) The Modular Ocean Data Assimilation System (MODAS). J Atmos Ocean Technol 19:240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holland WR, Chow JC, Bryan FO (1998) Application of a third-order upwind scheme in the NCAR Ocean Model. J Climate 11:1487–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodur RM, Pullen J, Cummings J, Hong X, Doyle JD, Martin P, Rennick MA (2002) The Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Oceanography 15:88–98Google Scholar
  10. Kara AB, Barron CN, Martin PJ, Smedstad LF, Rhodes RC (2005) Validation of interannual simulations from the 1/8° global Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM). Ocean Model 11:376–398. DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.01.003Google Scholar
  11. Large WG, McWilliams JC, Doney S (1994) Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev Geophys 32:63–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leipper DF, Volgenau D (1972) Hurricane heat potential of the Gulf of Mexico. J Phys Oceanogr 2:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mao Q, Chang SW, Pfeffer RL (2000) Influence of large-scale initial oceanic mixed layer depth on tropical cyclones. Mon Weather Rev 128:4058–4070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin PJ (1985) Simulation of the mixed layer at OWS November and Papa with several models. J Geophys Res 90:903–916Google Scholar
  15. Martin PJ (1999) An ocean model applied to the Chesapeake Bay plume. In: Spaulding ML, Butler JL (eds) Estuarine and coastal modeling. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, pp 1055–1067Google Scholar
  16. Martin PJ (2000) A description of the Navy Coastal Ocean Model Version 1.0. NRL Report: NRL/FR/7322-009962, Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, MSGoogle Scholar
  17. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20:851–875Google Scholar
  18. Morey SL, Martin PJ Martin, O’Brien JJ, Wallcraft AA, Zavala-Hidalgo J (2003) Export pathways for river discharged fresh water in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 108: 3303. DOI 10.1029/2002JC001674Google Scholar
  19. Morey SL, Zavala-Hidalgo J, O’Brien JJ (2005a) The seasonal variability of continental shelf circulation in the northern and western Gulf of Mexico from a high-resolution numerical model. In: Sturges W, Lugo-Fernandez A (eds) Circulation of the Gulf of Mexico: observations and models. Geophysical Monograph Series, pp 203–218. DOI 10.1029/161GM16Google Scholar
  20. Morey SL, Bourassa MA, Davis XJ, O’Brien JJ, Zavala-Hidalgo J (2005b) Remotely sensed winds for episodic forcing of ocean models. J Geophys Res 110:C10024. DOI 10.1029/2004JC002338Google Scholar
  21. O’Brien JJ (1967a) The non-linear response of a two-layer, baroclinic ocean to a stationary, axially symmetric hurricane: Part 1. Upwelling induced by momentum transfer. J Atmos Sci 24:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Brien JJ (1967b) The non-linear response of a two-layer, baroclinic ocean to a stationary, axially symmetric hurricane: Part 2. Upwelling and mixing induced by momentum transfer. J Atmos Sci 24:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Price JF (1981) Upper ocean response to a hurricane. J Phys Oceanogr 11:153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhodes RC, Hurlburt HE, Wallcraft AJ, Barron CN, Martin PJ, Smedstad OM, Cross S, Metzger JE, Shriver J, Kara A, Ko DS (2002) Navy real-time global modeling systems. Oceanography 15:29–43Google Scholar
  25. Shay LK, Black PG, Mariano AJ, Hawkins JD, Elsberry RL (1992) Upper ocean response to Hurricane Gilbert. J Geophys Res 97:20227–20248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen W, Ginis I (2003) Effects of surface heat flux-induced sea surface temperature changes on tropical cyclone intensity. Geophys Res Lett 30(18). DOI 10.1029/2003GL017878Google Scholar
  27. Smith WHF, Sandwell DT (1997) Global seafloor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science 277:1957–1962Google Scholar
  28. Verschell MA, Bourassa MA, Weissman DE, O’Brien JJ (1999) Model validation of the NASA scatterometer winds. J Geophys Res 104:11359–11374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker ND, Leben RR, Balasubramaniam S (2005) Hurricane-forced upwelling and chlorophyll a enhancement within cold-core cyclones in the Gulf of Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 32. DOI 10.1029/2005GL023716Google Scholar
  30. Zavala-Hidalgo J, Martinez-Lopez B, Gallegos-Garcia A, Morey SL, O’Brien JJ (2006) Seasonal upwelling on the western and southern shelves of the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Dynamics. DOI 10.1007/s10236-006-0072-3Google Scholar
  31. Zedler SE, Dickey TD, Doney SC, Price FJ, Yu X, Mellor GL (2002) Analyses and simulations of the upper ocean’s response to Hurricane Felix at the bermuda testbed mooring site: 13–23 August 1995. J Geophys Res 107(C12). DOI 10.1029/2001JC000969Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven L. Morey
    • 1
  • Mark A. Bourassa
    • 1
  • Dmitry S. Dukhovskoy
    • 1
  • James J. O’Brien
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction StudiesThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations