Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 56, Issue 3–4, pp 169–185 | Cite as

Measurements of Reynolds stress in a wind-driven lagoonal estuary

  • Anthony C. WhippleEmail author
  • Richard A. LuettichJr.
  • Harvey E. Seim
Original paper

Abstract

Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) have been used to measure Reynolds stresses in tidally dominated environments where wave action was minimal. In this paper, we examine observations from a microtidal estuary where the effects of wind stress and surface waves dominate the velocity variance. Reynolds stress measurements in this setting require a technique for addressing surface gravity wave contamination. We present here a method of reducing the effect of wave motion on Reynolds stresses by subtracting coincident observations along the axis of the ADCP beam. Linear wave theory is used to account for the attenuation of wave orbital velocities with depth. Using this method, Reynolds stress values are brought in line with those predicted by drag laws at the surface and bottom. The apparent Reynolds stress that is removed by the along-axis subtraction is shown to be largely due to the interaction of a slight tilt (1°) in the ADCP and the wave orbital velocity. During periods of stronger wind and waves, there is evidence of enhanced near-surface turbulence and momentum flux, presumably due to breaking waves. During these events, our calculated Reynolds stress magnitudes still appear reasonable, although the directions are suspect. We develop a diagnostic technique that clearly demarcates this region when it occurs. Coincident density profile measurements are used with the ADCP data to compute gradient Richardson numbers throughout the water column. Enhanced Reynolds stresses appear to correspond to Richardson numbers less than one.

Keywords

Reynolds stress ADCP Wave separation Wind stress Turbulence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers whose input greatly improved this manuscript. We would like to acknowledge funding for this work from EPA grant R-82867701-0 and NSF grant OCE-0327056 and the SEACOOS program.

References

  1. Agrawal YC, Aubrey DG (1992) Velocity observations above a rippled bed using laser Doppler velocimetry. J Geophys Res 97:20249–20259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown J, Colling A, Park D, Phillips J, Rothery D, Wright J (1989) Waves, tides and shallow-water processes. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 187Google Scholar
  3. Dean RG, Dalrymple RA (2002) Coastal processes with engineering applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Large WG, Pond S (1981) Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J Phys Oceanogr 11:324–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lu Y, Lueck RG (1999a) Using a broadband ADCP in a tidal channel. Part 1: Mean flow and shear. J Atmos Ocean Technol 16(11):1556–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu Y, Lueck RG (1999b) Using a broadband ADCP in a tidal channel. Part 2: Turbulence. J Atmos Ocean Technol 16(11):1568–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Luettich RA Jr, McNinch JE, Paerl HW, Peterson CH, Wells JT, Alperin M, Martens CS, Pinckney JL (2000) Neuse River Estuary modeling and monitoring project stage 1: hydrography and circulation, water column nutrients and productivity, sedimentary processes and benthic–pelagic coupling. Report UNC-WRRI-2000-325B, Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, p 172Google Scholar
  8. Luettich RA Jr, Carr SD, Reynold-Fleming JV, Fulcher CW, McNinch JE (2002) Semi-diurnal seiching in a shallow, micro-tidal lagoonal estuary. Cont Shelf Res 22(11–13):1669–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Reynolds-Fleming JV, Luettich RA Jr. (2004) Wind-driven lateral variability in the upper Neuse River Estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 60:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reynolds-Fleming JV, Fleming JG, Luettich RA (2002) Portable, autonomous vertical profiler for estuarine applications. Estuaries 25(1):142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rippeth TP, Simpson JH, Williams E (2003) Measurement of the rates of production and dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy in an energetic tidal flow: Red Wharf Bay revisited. J Phys Oceanogr 33:1889–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stacey MT, Monismith SG, Burau JR (1999) Measurements of Reynolds stress profiles in unstratified tidal flow. J Geophys Res 104(C5):10933–10949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Trowbridge JH (1998) On a technique for measurement of turbulent shear stress in the presence of surface waves. J Atmos Ocean Technol 15:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams E, Simpson JH (2004) Uncertainties in estimates of Reynolds stress and TKE production rate using the ADCP variance method. J Atmos Ocean Technol 21:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony C. Whipple
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard A. LuettichJr.
    • 1
  • Harvey E. Seim
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillMorehead CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations