Advertisement

Mine Water and the Environment

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 185–190 | Cite as

Application of a Peat-humic Agent for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage

  • Anna A. BogushEmail author
  • Vladimir G. Voronin
Technical Communication

Abstract

A peat-humic agent (PHA), derived by mechanical, chemical, and thermobaric treatment of peat from the Krugloe deposit (Novosibirsk region, Russia), is a good sorbent for potentially toxic elements, and can be used to neutralise acid mine drainage (AMD). A new AMD remediation method has been developed using this PHA with subsequent solid/liquid separation using haydite sand or activated carbon.

Keywords

Acid mine drainage Tailings Pollution Wastewater treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to Editor-in-Chief Robert Kleinmann for a thorough constructive review as well as the comments and questions by the anonymous reviewers. This research was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (06-05-65007) and the interdisciplinary project of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (31).

References

  1. Aleksandrova LN (1980) Organic substance of soil and processes of its transformation. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannikova LA (1990) Organic substances in hydrothermal ore formation. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. Benner SG, Gould WD, Blowes DW (2000) Microbial populations associated with the generation and treatment of acid mine drainage. Chem Geol 169:435–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogush AA, Androsova NV (2007) Ecogeochemical condition of river system of S. Talmovaya—Talmovaya—S. Bachat—Bachat—Inya (Kemerovo region). Ecol Ind Prod (Russian, publ by VIMI) 1:8–16Google Scholar
  5. Bogush AA, Lazareva EV (2008) Migrational properties of elements in the sulphide tailings and technogenic bottom sediment. Goldschmidt Abstr 2008–B. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(12):A92Google Scholar
  6. Bogush AA, Trofimov AN (2005) Application of peat-humic substance for decrease of waste influence on the environment. Ind Chem (Saint-Petersburg) 82(3):153–158Google Scholar
  7. Bogush AA, Letov SV, Miroshnichenko LV (2007a) Distribution and speciation of heavy metals in drainage water and sludge pond of the Belovo zinc plant (Kemerovo region). Geoecology 5:413–420Google Scholar
  8. Bogush AA, Moroz TN, Galkova OG, Maskenskaya OM (2007b) Application of natural material for drainage water treatment. Ecol Ind Prod (Russian, publ by VIMI) 2:63–69Google Scholar
  9. Chockalingam E, Subramanian S (2006) Studies on removal of metal ions and sulphate reduction using rice husk and Desulfotomaculum Nigrificans with reference to remediation of acid mine drainage. Chemosphere 62:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cravotta CA, Ward SJ (2008) Downflow limestone beds for treatment of net-acidic, oxic, iron-laden drainage from a flooded anthracite mine, Pennsylvania, USA: 1. Field evaluation. Mine Water Environ 27: 67–85Google Scholar
  11. Doncheva AV, Pokrovskiy SG (1999) Fundamentals of ecological production engineering. Moscow State Univ, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott P, Ragusa S, Catcheside D (1998) Growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria under acidic conditions in an upflow anaerobic bioreactor as a treatment system for acid mine drainage. Wat Res 32(12):3724–3730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucher S, Battaglia-Brunet F, Ignatiadis I, Morin D (2001) Treatment by sulfate-reducing bacteria of Chessy acid-mine drainage and metals recovery. Chem Eng Sci 56:1639–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabr MA, Bowders JJ (2000) Controlled low-strength material using fly ash and AMD sludge. J Hazard Mater 76:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerasimov IG, Chichagov SA (1971) Eurasian Soil Sci + 10: 3-11Google Scholar
  16. Herrera P, Uchiyama H, Igarashi T, Asakura K, Ochi Y, Iyatomi N, Nagae S (2007) Treatment of acid mine drainage through a ferrite formation process in central Hokkaido, Japan: evaluation of dissolved silica and aluminium interference in ferrite formation. Miner Eng 20:1255–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holin JV (2001) Humic acids as main complexing substances. Univ J (Kharkov, Ukrain) 4:21–25Google Scholar
  18. Ji SW, Kimb SJ (2008) Lab-scale study on the application of in-adit-sulfate-reducing system for AMD control. J Hazard Mater 160:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalina M, Caetano Chaves WL (2003) Acid reduction using microbiology: treating AMD effluent emerging from an abandoned mine portal. Hydrometallurgy 71:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim BH, Chang IS, Shin PK (2000) Biological treatment of acid mine drainage under sulphate-reducing conditions with solid waste materials as substrate. Water Res 34:1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kovalev IA, Sorokina NM, Tsizin GI (2000) Selection of effective sorbent for dynamic concentration of heavy metals from solution. Herald Moscow State Univ 41(5):309–314Google Scholar
  22. Kumar Vadapalli VR, Klink MJ, Etchebers O, Petrik LF, Gitari W, White RA, Key D, Iwuoha E (2008) Neutralization of acid mine drainage using fly ash, and strength development of the resulting solid residues. S Afr J Sci 104:317–324Google Scholar
  23. Lee T, Park J, Lee J (2004) Waste green sands as reactive media for the removal of zinc from water. Chemosphere 56:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maximovich NG, Blinov SM (1994) The use of geochemical methods for neutralization of surroundings aggressive to underground structures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international congress of the Association of Engineering Geology, Lisboa, Portugal, pp 3159–3164Google Scholar
  25. Maximovich NG, Kuleshova ML, Shimko TG (1999) Complex screens to protect groundwater at sludge sites. In: Proceedings, Conference on Protection of Groundwater from Pollution and Seawater Intrusion, Bari, p 14Google Scholar
  26. Nogueira da Silveira A, Silva R, Rubio J (2009) Treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) in South Brazil, comparative active processes and water reuse. Int J Miner Process 93:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orlov DS (1990) Humic acids of soil and general theory of ulmification. Moscow State Univ, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  28. Orlov DS, Osipova NN (1988) Infra-red spectrums of soil and soil components. Moscow State Univ, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  29. Pérez-López R, Miguel Nieto J, Ruiz de Almodo′var G (2007) Utilization of fly ash to improve the quality of the acid mine drainage generated by oxidation of a sulphide-rich mining waste: column experiments. Chemosphere 67:1637–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perminova IV (2008) Humic substances—a challenge to chemists XXI century. Chem Life 1:50–56Google Scholar
  31. Ríos CA, Williams CD, Roberts CL (2008) Removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage (AMD) using coal fly ash, natural clinker and synthetic zeolites. J Hazard Mater 156:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandstrom A, Mattsson E (2001) Bacterial ferrous iron oxidation of acid mine drainage as pre-treatment for subsequent metal recovery. Inter J Miner Process 62:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SanPiN (Sanitary Regulations and Government Standards for Drinking Water) (1996) 2.1.4.559–96 MoscowGoogle Scholar
  34. Sergeev VI, Shimko TG, Kuleshova ML, Maximovich NG (1996) Groundwater protection against pollution by heavy metals at waste disposal sites. Wat Sci Tech 34(7–8):383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus Chemistry—Genesis, Composition, Reactions. 2nd edit, Wiley, New York City p. 496Google Scholar
  36. Varshal GM, Velyuhanova TK, Baranova NN (1984) Geochem Int + 2: 279–283Google Scholar
  37. Varshal GM, Velyuhanova TK, Koshcheeva IJ (1993) Geochemical role of humic acids in migration of elements. Proc, Conf on Humic Substances in Biosphere. Nauka, Moscow, pp 97–117Google Scholar
  38. Zosin AP, Priymak TI, Avsaragov HB, Koshkina LB (2004) Laboratory research of cementing materials for protective barriers on basis of metallurgical slag. Geoecology 4:342–345Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RASNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Planeta-Ra LtdNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations