Ichthyological Research

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 250–255 | Cite as

Sexual dimorphism and dichromatism in the cyprinid fish Puntius titteya

  • Aki Mieno
  • Kenji Karino
Short Report


We documented sexual dimorphism and dichromatism in the cyprinid fish Puntius titteya. We observed no sexual difference in body size, although males had longer fins than females. Male body coloration was redder and exhibited a higher saturation than that of females. However, in females, coloration in the cheek (around the gill cover) was near red and exhibited high saturation compared to coloration of the abdomen. These results clearly indicate sexual dimorphism in fin size and dichromatism in P. titteya, which suggests that this species has a high potential use as a model for studying sexual selection.


Sexual differences Fin length Coloration Sexual selection 



We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and to S. Fukuda and A. Sato for their help in this study. This study complies with the current laws of Japan. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Amundsen T, Forsgren E (2001) Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13155–13160Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21:296–302Google Scholar
  4. Basolo AL (1990) Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 40:332–338Google Scholar
  5. Baube CL (1997) Manipulations of signalling environment affect male competitive success in three-spined sticklebacks. Anim Behav 53:819–833Google Scholar
  6. De Silva SS, Schut J, Kortmulder K (1985) Reproductive biology of six Barbus species indigenous to Sri Lanka. Environ Biol Fishes 12:201–218Google Scholar
  7. Dijkstra PD, Hekman R, Schulz RW, Groothuis TGG (2007) Social stimulation, nuptial colouration, androgens and immunocompetence in a sexual dimorphic cichlid fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:599–609Google Scholar
  8. Foster SA (1994) Evolution of the reproductive behaviour of threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp 381–398Google Scholar
  9. Fukuda S, Karino K (2014) Male red coloration, female mate preference, and sperm longevity in the cyprinid fish Puntius titteya. Environ Biol Fishes 97:1197–1205Google Scholar
  10. Houde AE (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Houde AE, Torio AJ (1992) Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav Ecol 3:346–351Google Scholar
  12. Karino K (2009) Sexual selection: signaling and courtship. In: Jamieson BGM (ed) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of fishes (Agnathans and bony fishes) Part B. Science Publishers, New Hampshire. pp 181–220Google Scholar
  13. Karino K, Ishiwatari T, Kudo H, Sato A (2011) Female mate preference for a costly ornament in male guppies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1305–1315Google Scholar
  14. Kortmulder K (1982) Etho-ecology of seventeen Barbus species (Pisces; Cyprinidae). Neth J Zool 32:144–168Google Scholar
  15. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330–333Google Scholar
  16. Olson VA, Owens IPF (1998) Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol Evol 13:510–514Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyTokyo Gakugei UniversityKoganeiJapan

Personalised recommendations