Ichthyological Research

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 159–164 | Cite as

The relationship between an introduced predator–prey pair, largemouth bass and bluegill, and the chlorophyll concentration in farm ponds

  • Hinako Noda
  • Atsushi MaruyamaEmail author
Short Report


An empirical study was conducted on the effects of an introduced predator–prey pair, largemouth bass and bluegill, on pelagic productivity in 22 ponds in central Japan. In the univariate analysis, the effect of fish invasion on chlorophyll concentration was not evident, primarily because this effect was screened by the positive and negative effects of phosphorus availability and the pond area, respectively. A positive effect on chlorophyll concentration was detected in the best statistical model using nutrient availability and pond area as independent factors. Fish invasion decreased the relative biomass of crustaceans to rotifers. This study showed that the invasion of these exotic fishes affected the pelagic community in the pond.


Alien species Exotic fish Phytoplankton production Top-down effect 



We are grateful to Mr Ryoichi Hinokio for his assistance during laboratory work. We would also like to thank Ms Mami Umemoto, Chie Sakaeyama, and Mai Katsube for their support in the field and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on our manuscript.


  1. Azuma M (1992) Ecological release in feeding behaviour: the case of bluegills in Japan. Hydrobiologia 243:269–276 Google Scholar
  2. Azuma M, Motomura Y (1998) Feeding habits of largemouth bass in a non-native environment: the case of a small lake with bluegill in Japan. Environ Biol Fishes 52:379–389Google Scholar
  3. Carpenter S R, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35:634–639Google Scholar
  4. Chambers PA, Kaiff J (1985) Depth distribution and biomass of submersed aquatic macrophyte communities in relation to Secchi depth. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:701–709Google Scholar
  5. Cottingham KL (1999) Nutrients and zooplankton as multiple stressors of phytoplankton communities: evidence from size structure. Limnol Oceanogr 44:810–827Google Scholar
  6. Dillon PJ, Rigler FH (1974) The phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 19:767–773Google Scholar
  7. Ehlinger TJ (1990) Habitat choice and phenotype-limited feeding efficiency in bluegill: individual differences and trophic polymorphism. Ecology 71:886–896Google Scholar
  8. Fee EJ, Shearer JA, DeBruyn ER, Schindler EU (1992) Effects of lake size on phytoplankton photosynthesis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:2445–2459Google Scholar
  9. Hall SR, Leibold MA, Lytle DA, Smith VH (2006) Inedible producers in food webs: controls on stoichiometric food quality and composition of grazers. Am Nat 167:628–637Google Scholar
  10. Hirose M, Nishibe Y, Ueki M, Nakano S (2003) Seasonal changes in the abundance of autotrophic picoplankton and some environmental factors in hypereutrophic Furuike Pond. Aquat Ecol 37:37–43Google Scholar
  11. JIS (1993) Testing methods for industrial wastewater (JIS K0102). Japanese Standard Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalff J, Knoechel R (1978) Phytoplankton and their dynamics in oligotrophic and eutrophic lakes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 9:475–495Google Scholar
  13. Lind OT (1986) The effect of non-algal turbidity on the relationship of Secchi depth to chlorophyll a. Hydrobiologia 140:27–35Google Scholar
  14. Maezono Y, Miyashita T (2003) Community-level impacts induced by introduced largemouth bass and bluegill in farm ponds in Japan. Biol Conserv 109:111–121Google Scholar
  15. Maezono Y, Miyashita T (2004) Impact of exotic fish removal on native communities in farm ponds. Ecol Res 19:263–267Google Scholar
  16. Maezono Y, Kobayashi R, Kusahara M, Miyashita T (2005) Direct and indirect effects of exotic bass and bluegill on exotic and native organisms in farm ponds. Ecol Appl 15:638–650Google Scholar
  17. Murakami K, Washitani I (2002) Handbook of alien species in Japan. Chijin Shokan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  18. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596Google Scholar
  20. Schindler DW (1978) Factors regulating phytoplankton production and standing crop in the world’s lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 23:478–486Google Scholar
  21. Shapiro J, Wright DI (1984) Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota, the first two years. Freshw Biol 14:371–383Google Scholar
  22. Sterner RW (1990) Lake morphometry and light in the surface layer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:687–692Google Scholar
  23. Yonekura R, Kita M, Yuma M (2004) Species diversity in native fish community in Japan: comparison between non-invaded and invaded ponds by exotic fish. Ichthyol Res 51:176–179Google Scholar
  24. Yonekura R, Nakai K, Yuma M (2002) Trophic polymorphism in introduced bluegill in Japan. Ecol Res 17:49–57Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyRyukoku UniversityOtsuJapan

Personalised recommendations