Advertisement

Ichthyological Research

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 349–355 | Cite as

Reproduction and early development of a freshwater pipefish Microphis leiaspis in Okinawa-jima Island, Japan

  • Taiki Ishihara
  • Katsunori Tachihara
Full Paper

Abstract

We investigated the size at maturation, breeding season, and morphological development of larvae and juveniles of a freshwater pipefish Microphis leiaspis, which belongs to Gastrophori, collected from three rivers on the northern part of Okinawa-jima Island, Japan. The minimum size of brooding males was 105–123 mm in standard length (SL). The smallest mature female was estimated to be ca. 130 mm SL from the analysis of gonadosomatic index (GSI) and histological observations of gonads. The breeding season was estimated to be from June to December according to monthly changes in female GSI, histological observations of gonads, and monthly changes in the occurrence of brooding males. The number of eggs in the male brood pouch ranged from 75 to 241 (mean ± SD: 152 ± 52, n = 22). The male releases newly hatched larvae in freshwater areas. After newborns grow in the sea, they return to freshwater areas of the rivers and attain maturity. Microphis leiaspis was conformed to have an amphidromous life history. Notochord length of the released larvae was 6.1 mm, with a well-developed finfold. Larvae attained 11.1 mm SL, formation of the caudal and dorsal fin rays was complete, and the caudal fin became lozenge shaped at 30 days after the release, and juveniles reached 36.0 mm SL at 63 days after release. In the period between 30 and 63 days after the release, formation of all fins except the pectoral fins was completed, and caudal fin rays were extended and sector shaped with deep slits between each fin ray. The morphology of the released larvae of M. leiaspis is similar to that of Gastrophori species, and the morphology of juveniles similar to other species of Microphis.

Keywords

Microphis leiaspis Amphidromy Larva Breeding season 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Emeritus Professor S. Shokita, Associate Professor T. Yoshino, and Assistant Professor H. Shikatani (Faculty of Sciences, University of the Ryukyus), for their kind support. We appreciate to K. Maeda and Y. Mizuno (University of the Ryukyus) for useful information on larval occurrence. We thank the members of the Laboratory of Fisheries Biology and Coral Reef Studies (University of the Ryukyus) and the members of the University of the Ryukyus Diving Club for their help with fish collection and for providing information. The authors also thank Assistant Professor J.D. Reimer (University of the Ryukyus) for critical comments on the early draft manuscript and great help with the English. This study was partially supported by the 21st Century COE Program of the University of the Ryukyus.

References

  1. Azzarello MY (1991) Some questions concerning the Syngnathidae brood pouch. Bull Mar Sci 49:741–747Google Scholar
  2. Begovac PC, Wallace RA (1987) Ovary of the pipefish, Syngnathus scovelli. J Morph 193:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begovac PC, Wallace RA (1988) Stages of oocyte development in the pipefish, Syngnathus scovelli. J Morph 197:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Sevensson I (1986) Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in two pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carcupino M, Baldacci A, Mazzini M, Franzoi P (1997) Morphological organization of the male brood pouch epithelium of Syngnathus abaster Risso (Teleostea, Syngnathidae) before, during, and after egg incubation. Tissue Cell 29:21–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carcupino M, Baldacci A, Mazzini M, Franzoi P (2002) Functional significance of the male brood pouch in the reproductive strategies of pipefishes and seahorses: a morphological and ultrastructural comparative study on three anatomically different pouches. J Fish Biol 61:1465–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson CE (1984) Review of the genus Microphis Kaup (Pisces: Syngnathidae). Bull Mar Sci 35:117–181Google Scholar
  8. Gomon MF, Neira FJ (1998) Syngnathidae: pipefish and seahorses. In: Neira FJ, Miskiewicz AG, Trnski T (eds) Temperate Australian fishes. Laboratory guide for larval fish identification. University of Western Australia Press, Nedlands, pp 122–131Google Scholar
  9. Jones AG, Avise JC (1997) Polygynandry in the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Evolution 51:1611–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuiter RH (2000) Seahorses, pipefishes and their relatives: a comprehensive guide to Syngnathiformes. TMC publishing, ChorleywoodGoogle Scholar
  11. Minami T, Kimura S (1988) Syngnathidae. In: Okiyama M (ed) An atlas of the early stage fishes in Japan. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 312–317Google Scholar
  12. Monteiro NM, Almada VC, Vieira MN (2003) Early life history of the Pipefish Nerophis lumbriciformis (Pisces:Syngnathidae). J Mar Biol Ass UK 83:1179–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Monteiro NM, Almada VC, Vieira MN (2005) Implications of different brood pouch structures in syngnathid reproduction. J Mar Biol Ass UK 85:1235–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakazato Y, Fujita Y (1986) Distribution, spawning, egg development and pre-flexion larvae of Microphis (Oostethus) brachyurus brachyurus in Izu, Sagami and Bousou. Suisan Zousyoku 33:230–239Google Scholar
  15. Nelson JS (1994) Fishes of the world, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohta I, Tachihara K (2004) Larval development and food habits of the marbled parrotfish, Leptoscarus vaigiensis, associated with drifting algae. Ichthyol Res 51:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Selman K, Wallace RA, Player D (1991) Ovary of the seahorse, Hippocampus erectus. J Morph 209:285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Senou H (1989) Syngnathidae. In: Kawanabe H, Mizuno N (eds) Freshwater fishes of Japan. Yama-kei, Tokyo, pp 450–451Google Scholar
  19. Senou H (1993) Syngnathidae. In: Nakabo T (ed) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 481–483Google Scholar
  20. Senou H, Suzuki T, Hosokawa M (1995) First record of a freshwater pipefish, Microphis (Coelonotus) argulus (Pisces:Syngnathidae) from the Northern Hemisphere. IOP Diving News 6(3):2–3Google Scholar
  21. Watanabe S, Kaneko T, Watanabe Y (1999) Immunocytochemical detection of mitochondria-rich cells in the brood pouch epithelium of the pipefish, Syngnathus schlegeli:structural comparison with mitochondial-rich cells in the gills and larval epidermis. Cell Tissue Res 295:141–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. William DQ, Nathan RH (1980) The osmotic role of the brood pouch in the pipefish Syngnathus scovelli. Comp Biochem Physiol 67:675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson AB, Vincent A, Ahnesjö I, Meyer A (2001) Male pregnancy in seahorses and pipefishes (Family Syngnathidae): rapid diversification of parental brood pouch morphology inferred from a molecular phylogeny. J Heredity 92:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yoshino T, Yoshigou H (1998) First records of two freshwater pipefishes of the genus Microphis (Syngnathiformes:Syngnathidae) from Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 45:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Engineering and ScienceUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Fisheries Biology and Coral Reef Studies, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations