Effect of Key2Teach on Dutch teachers’ relationships with students with externalizing problem behavior: a randomized controlled trial
- 112 Downloads
The teacher-student relationship plays an important role in the academic and behavioral development of primary school children with externalizing problem behavior. However, such problem behavior often threatens the quality of the teacher-student relationship. Teacher-focused coaching intervention Key2Teach aims to improve elements of the relationship between teachers and students with externalizing problem behavior and consists of two phases and four building blocks. This intervention provides primary school teachers with insight into their mental representation of the relationship and opportunities to practice functional interaction skills. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), effects of Key2Teach on different aspects of the relationship between teachers and students with externalizing problem behavior were examined. In two cohorts, 103 dyads consisting of a teacher and a student with externalizing problem behavior in grades 3–6 were assessed three times during a school year. Fifty-three dyads received the intervention (intervention group), whereas 50 dyads received no intervention (control group). Data were collected on teacher-reported teacher-student closeness and conflict, and on teacher interaction skills in various domains. Results show a significant increase in closeness and a decrease in conflict as a result of Key2Teach, with substantial effect sizes. No effects on teacher interaction skills were found. This study indicates that Key2Teach may help teachers to improve elements of the relationship they have with students with externalizing problem behavior. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
KeywordsTeacher-student relationships Key2Teach Intervention Externalizing problem behavior Teacher interaction skills
The study on the effects of Key2Teach was funded by a grant from SIA Taskforce for Applied Research in the Netherlands.
Compliance with ethical standards
The research protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Southwest Holland (METC-ZWH, 13-023).
- Allen, D. (1967). Microteaching: a description. Palo Alto: Stanford Teacher Education Program.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachement and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., Buyse, E., Germeijs, V., Luyckx, K., & Soenens, B. (2008). Reciprocal relations between teacher-child conflict and aggressive behavior in kindergarten: a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37(3), 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., Buyse, E., Munter, S., Max, K., & Moens, L. (2009). Futher examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale. Infant and Child development, 18, 502–520.Google Scholar
- Downer, J., Booren, L. M., Lima, O. K., Luckner, A., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). The individualized classroom assessment scoring system (inCLASS): preliminary reliability and validity of a system for observing preschoolers' competence in classroom interactions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hamre, B., Pianta, R., Mashburn, A., & Downer, J. (2007). Building a science of classrooms: application of the CLASS framework in over 4,000 U.S. early childhood and elementary classrooms. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development. Retrieved 07 13, 2018, from https://www.fcd-us.org/assets/2016/04/BuildingAScienceOfClassroomsPiantaHamre.pdf.
- Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Mashburn, A. J. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of conflict with young students: looking beyond problem behaviors. Social Development, 17, 115–136.Google Scholar
- Hayes, B., Richardson, S., Hindle, S., & Grayson, K. (2001). Developing teaching assistants’ skills in positive behaviour management: an application of video interaction guidance in a secondary school. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28, 255–269.Google Scholar
- Jansen, H., Brons, C., & Faber, F. (2013). Beeldcoaching zet in beweging [Video Interaction Guidance, move]. Baarn: De Weijer Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
- Koomen, H. M., & Lont, T. A. (2004). Teacher relationship interview qualitative coding manual. Ongepubliceerde Nederlandse vertaling [unpublished Dutch translation]: Universiteit van Amterdam.Google Scholar
- Koomen, H. M., & Spilt, J. L. (2013). Relatiegerichte reflectie in het basisonderwijs met behulp van het Leerkracht Relatie Interviews: Trainingshandleiding [Relationship-focused reflection in primary education with the teacher relationship interview: Manual] (pp 1–43). Universiteit van Amsterdam & Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Koomen, H., Verschueren, K., & Pianta, R. (2007). LLRV Leerling Leerkracht Relatie Vragenlijst Handleiding [Student Teacher Relationship Scale: Manual]. Houten: Bohn Staflue van Loghum.Google Scholar
- LBBO. (2016, 04 12). SVIB- School Video Interactie Begeleiding [Video Interaction Guidance]. Retrieved from http://www.lbbb.eu/wat-is-lbbb/svib-school-video-interactiebegeleiding.
- Looze, M. d., Dorsselaer, S. v., Roos, S. d., Verdurmen, J., Stevens, G., Gommans, R., … Vollebergh, W. (2014). HBSC (Health Behaviour in School-aged Children) 2013 Gezondheid, welzijn en opvoeding van jongeren in Nederland [HBSC 2013: Health, well-being, and education of young people in the Netherlands]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1997-2017). Mplus user’s guide. (seventh edition). Los Angeles: Munthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology (pp. 199–234). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. (2012). Classroom assessment scoring system: upper elementary manual. Charlottesville: Teachstone.Google Scholar
- Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Thead, B. K., Acker, S. E., Gable, R. A., & Zigmond, N. P. (2009). Can you hear me now? Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training. Teacher Edcuation and Special Education, 32(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. M., Thijs, J. T., & Oort, F. J. (2013). Interpersonal behaviors and complementarity in interactions between teachers and kindergartners with a variety of externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spilt, J. L., & Koomen, H. M. (2009). Widening the view on teacher-child relationships: teachers’ narratives concerning disruptive versus non-disruptive children. School Psychology Review, 38, 86–101.Google Scholar
- Sroufe, L. A., & Fleeson, J. (1988). The coherence of family relationships. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: mutual influences (pp. 27–47). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Veen, A. F., Holland, J. G., Hoogendijk, C., Clements, W., Reith, M., Scheltens, J.,… Vuijk, P. (2015). Key2Teach, Multi-Method Coaching: Trainingshandleiding [Manual]. Amsterdam: Inholland University of Applied.Google Scholar
- Whitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for performance: GROWing human potential and purpose: the principles and practice of coaching and leadership. People skills for professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar