Advertisement

European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 147–167 | Cite as

Developmental trajectories of goal orientations and math skills from grades 7 to 9

  • Kaja MädamürkEmail author
  • Eve Kikas
Article
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

The current study focuses on the developmental trajectories of mastery and performance goal orientations and their relationships with math skills along with math tasks left unanswered. The sample included 476 students from grades 7 to 9 (mean age at the beginning of the study = 13 years). Goal orientations were assessed with questionnaires and math skills with tests. The tasks were the same at all study points. Latent profile and latent transition analysis were used to find profile groups and developmental trajectories. Four profile groups emerged in grade 7 and five groups in grades 8 and 9. The most stable group throughout the years showed high mastery goals, average performance goals, and high math skills in grades 7 and 8; thus, high mastery goals together with somewhat lower performance goals supported good math skills. Moreover, only few students who had somewhat higher performance goals compared with mastery goals in grade 8 moved to the high math skill group in grade 9. Still, math skills had a more dominating role in formation of the profiles than goal orientations; thus, the role of goal orientations may not be essential for all of the students.

Keywords

Goal orientations Math skills Middle school Person-oriented approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by institutional research funding IUT (3-3) of the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research.

References

  1. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1996). Changes in achievement goal orientations after the transition to middle school. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Aunola, K., Nurmi, J.-E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2003). The roles of achievement-related behaviors and parental beliefs in children’s mathematical performance. Educational Psychology, 23(4), 403–421.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman, L. R., & Andersson, H. (2010). The person and the variable in developmental psychology. Journal of Psychology, 218(3), 155–165.  https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000025.Google Scholar
  5. Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context. A person-oriented approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 879–896.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2009). Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Perkun, R. (2008). Individual differences in achievement goals: a longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 584–608.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duru, A., & Koklu, O. (2011). Middle school students’ reading comprehension of mathematical texts and algebraic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(4), 447–468.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 X 2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 500–519.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fryer, J. W., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). Stability and change in achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 700–714.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: when are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.2.316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirvonen, R., Tolvanen, A., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2012). The developmental dynamics of task-avoidant behavior and math performance in kindergarten and elementary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 715–723.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jõgi, A.-L., & Kikas, E. (2016). Calculation and word problem-solving skills in primary grades – Impact of cognitive abilities and longitudinal interrelations with task-persistent behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 165–181.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12096.
  16. Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school: the mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khezri Azar, H., Lavasani, M. G., Malahmadi, E., & Amani, J. (2010). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning approaches and mathematics achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 942–947.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kikas, E., Peets, K., Palu, A., & Afanasjev, J. (2009). The role of individual and contextual factors in the development of maths skills. Educational Psychology, 29(5), 541–560.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903118499.
  19. Luo, W., Paris, S. G., Hogan, D., & Luo, Z. (2011). Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merenluto, K., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: towards a systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 519–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Metsäpelto, R.-L., Pakarinen, E., Kiuru, N., Poikkeus, A.-M., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2015). Developmental dynamics between children’s externalizing problems, task-avoidant behaviour, and academic performance in early school years: a 4-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 246–257.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Múthén.Google Scholar
  24. Ocak, G., & Yamac, A. (2013). Examination of the relationships between fifth graders’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivational beliefs, attitudes, and achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 380–387.Google Scholar
  25. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: ready to learn: students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (volume III), PISA. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en
  26. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
  27. Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task focused behaviors in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: a cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 478–491.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palu, A., & Kikas, E. (2010). The types of the most widespread errors in solving arithmetic word problems and their persistence in time. In A. Toomela (Ed.), Systemic Person-Oriented Study of Child Development in Early Primary School (pp. 155–172). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  29. Phillips, N., & Lindsay, G. (2007). Motivation in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 57–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130600947119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  32. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurements, 53(3), 801–813.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shim, S. S., & Finch, W. H. (2014). Academic and social achievement goals and early adolescents’ adjustment: a latent class approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 98–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegler, R. S. (2016). Continuity and change in the field of cognitive development and in the perspectives of one cognitive developmentalist. Child Development Perspectives, 10(2), 128–133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tapola, A., & Niemivarta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 291–312.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X205272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tire, G., Lepmann, T., Jukk, H., Puksand, H., Henno, I., Lindemann, K., Kitsing, M., Täht, K., & Lorenz, B. (2013). PISA 2012 Eesti tulemused. Tallinn: Innove.Google Scholar
  38. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: a person-centred analysis. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 251–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2011). Stability and change in achievement goal orientations: a person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 82–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vabariigi Valitsus. (2011/2014). Põhikooli ja gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava. [National Curriculum for Middle Schools and Upper Secondary Schools], Riigi Teataja I 2010, 6, 21. Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/129082014020.
  41. Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740.Google Scholar
  42. Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wormington, S. V., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2016). A new look at multiple goal pursuit: the promise of a person-centered approach. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 1–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9358-2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations