Advertisement

European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 245–253 | Cite as

Boon and bane of being sure: the effect of performance certainty and expectancy on task performance

  • Simon Schindler
  • Marc-André Reinhard
  • Oliver Dickhäuser
Article

Abstract

Previous research has suggested certainty to be an important factor when investigating effects of level of expectancies on future behavior. With the present study, we addressed the interplay of expectancy certainty and level of expectancies regarding task performance. We assumed that certain performance expectancies provide a better basis for the regulation of persistence and, therefore, lead to improved performance when people expect to perform well. However, when people have bad performance expectations, being certain (compared to being uncertain) about this expectation decreases motivation to work hard on the task because it is assumed it will not pay off anyway. Accordingly, in our study, we found that the performance of participants with high performance expectancies increased with increasing expectancy certainty. By contrast, performance of participants with low performance expectancies decreased with increasing expectancy certainty. Additionally, certainty and expectancy were shown to be unrelated, supporting the idea that they are independent constructs.

Keywords

Performance expectancies Certainty Performance Social cognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study reported in this article was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation to Marc-André Reinhard (RE 2218/3-3) and Oliver Dickhäuser (DI 929/2-3).

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., et al. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27--58.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy. Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Dickhäuser, O., Reinhard, M.-A., & Englert, C. (2011a). “Of course I will…”: the combined effect of certainty and level of expectancies on persistence and performance. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickhäuser, O., Reinhard, M., & Englert, C. (2011b). How task experience influences students’ performance expectancies: the role of certainty. Psychological Reports, 109, 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dinger, F. C., & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Does implicit theory of intelligence cause achievement goals? Evidence from an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Heller, K., Gädicke, A. K., & Weinläder, H. (1985). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 13. Klassen [Cognitive aptitude test for grade 4 to grade 13]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Google Scholar
  17. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: how often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marshall, M. A., & Brown, J. D. (2004). Expectations and realizations: the role of expectancies in achievement settings. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1997). Expectancies. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93–130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: a large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Schindler
    • 1
  • Marc-André Reinhard
    • 1
  • Oliver Dickhäuser
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
  2. 2.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations