Boon and bane of being sure: the effect of performance certainty and expectancy on task performance
- 263 Downloads
Previous research has suggested certainty to be an important factor when investigating effects of level of expectancies on future behavior. With the present study, we addressed the interplay of expectancy certainty and level of expectancies regarding task performance. We assumed that certain performance expectancies provide a better basis for the regulation of persistence and, therefore, lead to improved performance when people expect to perform well. However, when people have bad performance expectations, being certain (compared to being uncertain) about this expectation decreases motivation to work hard on the task because it is assumed it will not pay off anyway. Accordingly, in our study, we found that the performance of participants with high performance expectancies increased with increasing expectancy certainty. By contrast, performance of participants with low performance expectancies decreased with increasing expectancy certainty. Additionally, certainty and expectancy were shown to be unrelated, supporting the idea that they are independent constructs.
KeywordsPerformance expectancies Certainty Performance Social cognition
The study reported in this article was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation to Marc-André Reinhard (RE 2218/3-3) and Oliver Dickhäuser (DI 929/2-3).
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27--58.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Heller, K., Gädicke, A. K., & Weinläder, H. (1985). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 13. Klassen [Cognitive aptitude test for grade 4 to grade 13]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Google Scholar
- Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1997). Expectancies. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93–130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar