European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 1201–1220 | Cite as

Construct validity of self-concept in TIMSS’s student background questionnaire: a test of separation and conflation of cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept among Saudi eighth graders

  • Maher M. Abu-Hilal
  • Faisal A. Abdelfattah
  • Saleh A. Alshumrani
  • Adel S. Abduljabbar
  • Herbert W. Marsh
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The aims of this study are to: (a) assess if cognitive self-concept (competence) and affective self-concept in mathematics and science are different constructs, (b) evaluate the construct validity of self-concept in the context of conflation and separation, and (c) test if the relationships among cognitive and affective variables are invariant across gender. The data for this study were obtained from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2007 database. Data about 2,687 out of 4,099 eighth grade Saudi students were subject to various analyses. The variables used in this study were mathematics and science self-concepts, and mathematics and science subject value as part of the Students Background Questionnaire. The relationships among constructs were examined with the use of SPSS16 and the structural equation modeling software, AMOS16. The results demonstrated that subject value and self-concept were different constructs. Also, the results demonstrated that cognitive and affective self-concepts were independent, but strongly related constructs, and the structure of the construct was clearer when self-concept was separated into cognitive and affective components than when it was conflated. The relationships among cognitive, affective, and subject value in mathematics and science were invariant across gender. However, their relationships with achievement were not invariant across gender.

Keywords

Self-concept TIMSS Math and science achievements Construct validity SBQ 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their enlightening comments.

References

  1. Abu-Hilal, M. (2001). Correlates of achievement in the United Arab Emirates: a sociocultural study. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2005). Generality of Self-Perception Models in the Arab culture: result from ten years of research. In H. Marsh, R. Carven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), The New Frontiers of Self Research (pp. 157–196). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2008). Motivation, attribution of academic experiences and achievement among Arab students within a socio-cultural context. In T. O. Seng, D. M. McInerney, A. D. Liem, & T. Ai-Girl (Eds.), Research in multicultural education and international perspectives (Vol. 7, pp. 217–244). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Abu-Hilal, M. M., & Darweesh, K. (2004). Social and personal conceptions of academic self: relationships of self-concept with achievement and subject matter value. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20, 25–51.Google Scholar
  5. Arens, A. K., Yeung, A., Craven, R., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). Toward twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: domain specificity and separation between competence and affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 970–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. (1995). EQS: structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, J., & Tunmer, W. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: an examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickhöuser, O., Reuter, M., & Hilling, C. (2005). Coursework selection: a frame of reference approach using structural equation modeling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eklöf, H. (2006). Developing and validation of scores from an instrument measuring student test-taking motivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 643–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. (2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 7, 2–29.Google Scholar
  14. Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 423–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Irwing, P. (1996). Cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept: a test of construct validity using structural equations modeling. Psychological Reports, 79, 1127–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, S., & Meng, L. (2010). Re-examining factor structure of the attitudinal items from TIMSS 2003 in cross-cultural study of mathematics self-concept. Educational Psychology, 30(6), 699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: an internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh, H., & Hattie, J. (1996). Theroetical perspectives on the structure of self-concept. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept (pp. 38–90). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: is parsimony always desirable? The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364–390.Google Scholar
  22. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: cross-cultural generalizability of the internal-external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsh, H. W., & Köller, O. (2003). Bringing together two theoretical models of relations between academic self-concept and achievement. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 17–47). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  24. Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: a developmental perspective. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567–601.Google Scholar
  26. Marsh, H., Kong, C., & Hau, K. (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: importance of native and non-native languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsh, H., Abduljabbar, S., Abu-Hilal, M., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K. C., Xu, M. K., Nagengast, B. & Parker, P. (2012). Factorial, convergent and discriminant validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: a comparison of Arab and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of Educational Psychology (in press). doi: 10.1037/a0029907.
  28. Olson, J. F., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 Technical Report. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  29. Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zymbylas, M. (2004). Differential effects of science attitudes and science achievement in Australia, Cyprus, and the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shavelson, R., & Marsh, H. (1986). On the structure of self-concept. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self related cognitions in anxiety and motivation. Hilsdale: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skaalvik, E. M., & Bong, M. (2003). Self-concept and self-efficacy revisited. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 67–89). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2008). An alternative interpretation of the relationship between self-concept and mathematics achievement: Comparison of Chinese and UD students as a context. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21(3), 154–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maher M. Abu-Hilal
    • 1
  • Faisal A. Abdelfattah
    • 2
  • Saleh A. Alshumrani
    • 2
  • Adel S. Abduljabbar
    • 2
  • Herbert W. Marsh
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Education, Sultan Qaboos UniversityAl KhodhOman
  2. 2.The Excellence Research Center of Science and Mathematics EducationKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Oxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations