European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 725–745 | Cite as

The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools

  • Raúl NavarroEmail author
  • Cristina Serna
  • Verónica Martínez
  • Roberto Ruiz-Oliva


Cyberbullying victimization research on individual and familial correlates is scarce in Spain. By building upon previous studies, this research examines the role of Internet usage and parental mediation in online victimization. Spanish children from rural public schools (10–12 years; n = 1068) completed a self-report questionnaire which measured being cyberbullied, Internet use and parental mediation strategies. Logistic regression analyses examined the association among cyberbullying victimization, online activities, intensity and purposes of online communication, and restricting, evaluating and co-using parental mediation. The results show that Internet use, specifically online communication, increases the likelihood of cyberbullying victimization. Conversely, monitoring software installed on the computer, joint creation of rules regarding the time spent online and personal information shared help lessen the likelihood of online victimization. The results are examined in the light of previous research, while implications for practice and future research are considered.


Cyberbullying Victimization Internet use Online communication Parental mediation 



  1. Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010). Cyberbullying victimization among Turkish online social utility members. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 192–201.Google Scholar
  2. Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 803–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonetti, L., Campbell, M. A., & Gilmore, L. (2010). The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryant, J. A., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Smallwood, A. M. K. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communicationn, 11(2), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, T. (2006). CFA with equality constraints, multiple groups, and mean structures. In T. Brown (Ed.), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (pp. 236–319). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  7. Buelga, S., Cava, M. J., & Musitu, G. (2010). Cyberbullying: Victimización entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de Internet. Psicothema, 22(4), 784–789.Google Scholar
  8. Chou, C., Condron, L., & Belland, J. (2005). A review of the research on Internet Addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniel, W. W. (1999). Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., & Nichols, R. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 962–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estévez, A., Villardón, L., Calvete, E., Padilla, P., & Orue, I. (2010). Adolescentes víctimas de cyberbullying: Prevalencia y características. Behavioral Psychology, 18(1), 73–89.Google Scholar
  13. Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescents. The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 58(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Houbre, B., Traquinio, C., & Thuillier, I. (2006). Bullying among students and its consequences on health. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(2), 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. INE (2010). Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación en los hogares 2010. Retrieved from:
  17. INTECO. (2009). Study on safe habits in the use of ICT by children and adolescents and e-trust of their parents. Madrid: INTECO.Google Scholar
  18. JCCM (2010). Estadística educativa sobre el alumnado matriculado en el curso académico 2009/2010. Retrieved from
  19. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. (2008). Extending the school grounds? bullying experiences in cyberspace. The Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? a comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2008). Cyber bullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, S. J. (2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from Internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 509–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, S. J., & Chae, Y. G. (2007). Children’s Internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 640–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livingstone, S., & Brake, D. R. (2009). On the rapid rise of social networking sites: New findings and policy implications. Children & Society, 24, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McNeil, D. (1996). Epidemiological research methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navarro, R., Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., & Martínez, V. (2012). Children’s cyberbullying victimization: associations with social anxiety and social competence in a Spanish sample. Child Indicators Research, 5, 281–295.Google Scholar
  31. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 526–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). The darker sides of the Internet: Violence, cyber bullying and victimization. In K. Subrahmanyam & D. Šmahel (Eds.), Digital youth: The role of media in development (pp. 179–199). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Topçu, Ç., Erdur-Baker, Ö., & Çapa-Aydin, Y. (2008). Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Twyman, K., Saylor, C., Taylor, L. A., & Comeaux, C. (2010). Comparing children and adolescents engaged in cyberbullying to matched peers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(2), 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007a). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007b). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Den Eijnden, R., Meerkerk, G., Vermulst, A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2008). Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Den Eijnden, R., Spijkerman, R., Vermulst, A. A., Van Rooij, T. J., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2010). Compulsive Internet use among adolescents: Bidirectional parent–child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimization and perpetration. Children & Society, 25, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willard, N. E. (2006). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Eugene: Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use.Google Scholar
  46. Ybarra, M. L., Alexander, C., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Depressive symptomatology, youth Internet use, and online interactions: A national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressors/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2007). Internet prevention messages: Targeting the right online behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 138–145.Google Scholar
  49. Zhao, S. (2006). Do Internet users have more social ties? a call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 844–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raúl Navarro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristina Serna
    • 1
  • Verónica Martínez
    • 1
  • Roberto Ruiz-Oliva
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and HumanitiesUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCuencaSpain
  2. 2.Málaga UniversityFaculty of Communication ScienceMálagaSpain

Personalised recommendations