European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 529–543 | Cite as

Sex differences in secondary school success: why female students perform better

  • Franziska Fischer
  • Johannes Schult
  • Benedikt Hell
Article

Abstract

School success is closely linked to intelligence but also to non-cognitive factors such as achievement motivation. The present study examines which non-cognitive factors predict secondary school grades and looks at reasons why female students tend to outperform their male counterparts. A sample of 554 German freshman students provided measures of general intelligence, achievement motivation, science course choice, self-efficacy, self-perceived academic achievement, and test anxiety. Results show that achievement motivation, self-perceived academic achievement, and sex significantly contribute to the final secondary school success above intelligence. Females’ advantage in final secondary school grades becomes even larger after controlling for general intelligence. This advantage can be explained by females’ higher achievement motivation. Showing more compensatory effort as well as self-control and taking more pride in their own productivity helps females to outperform their male counterparts at secondary school.

Keywords

School achievement Sex differences Achievement motivation Personality Intelligence 

References

  1. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: what do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  3. Calvin, C. M., Fernandes, C., Smith, P., Visscher, P. M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Sex, intelligence and educational achievement in a national cohort of over 175,000 11-year-old schoolchildren in England. Intelligence, 38(4), 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Harlaar, N., Greven, C. U., & Plomin, R. (2010). More than just IQ: a longitudinal examination of self-perceived abilities as predictors of academic performance in a large sample of UK twins. Intelligence, 38(4), 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Education and Psychology, 93, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colom, R., & Lynn, R. (2004). Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence on 12–18 year olds. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(1), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Six approaches to the explication of facet-level traits: examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. Oxford: Harper.Google Scholar
  9. Day, L., Hanson, K., Maltby, J., Proctor, C., & Wood, A. (2010). Hope uniquely predicts objective academic achievement above intelligence, personality, and previous academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 550–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., De Bolle, M., & De Clercq, B. (2008). Sex differences in school performance as a function of conscientiousness, imagination and the mediating role of problem behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Raad, B., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: a review. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 303–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downey, D. B., & Vogt Yuan, A. S. (2005). Sex differences in school performance during high school: puzzling patterns and possible explanations. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(2), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Education and Psychology, 98(1), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott, R., & Strenta, A. C. (1988). Effects of improving the reliability of the GPA on prediction generally and on comparative predictions for gender and race particularly. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(4), 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, L., Hershberger, S., Field, E., Wersinger, S., Pellis, S., Geary, D., et al. (2008). Sex differences: summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freudenthaler, H. H., Spinath, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2008). Predicting school achievement in boys and girls. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furnham, A., & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and intelligence predict academic school grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement: big five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gavin, M. K., & Reis, S. M. (2005). Helping teachers to encourage talented girls in mathematics. In S. K. Johnsen & J. Kendrick (Eds.), Teaching and counseling gifted girls (pp. 147–167). Waco: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). G, jobs and life. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (1st ed., pp. 293–342). Elsevier: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., Diffley, R., III, Goodyear, J., Shanahan, E. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Are SSATS and GPA enough? A theory-based approach to predicting academic success in secondary school. Journal of Education and Psychology, 101(4), 964–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2011). Sind Jungen die neuen Bildungsverlierer? Empirische Evidenz für Geschlechterdisparitäten zuungunsten von Jungen und Erklärungsansätze. [Are boys left behind at school? Reviewing and explaining education-related gender disparities]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25(2), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckman, J. J., & LaFontaine, P. A. (2007). The American high school graduation rate: trends and levels. (Discussion paper No. 3216). Bonn, Germany: IZA. http://ftp.iza.org/dp3216.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011.
  30. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hell, B., Trapmann, S., & Schuler, H. (2007). Eine Metaanalyse der Validität von fachspezifischen Studierfähigkeitstests im deutschsprachigen Raum. [A meta-analytic investigation of subject-specific admission tests in German-speaking countries]. Empirische Pädagogik, 21(3), 251–270.Google Scholar
  32. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hewitt, B. N., & Goldman, R. D. (1975). Occam’s razor slices through the myth that college women overachieve. Journal of Education and Psychology, 67(2), 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hinz, A., Schumacher, J., Albani, C., Schmid, G., & Brähler, E. (2006). Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. [Standardization of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in the German population]. Diagnostica, 52(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodapp, V. (1991). Das Prüfungsängstlichkeitsinventar TAI-G: eine erweiterte und modifizierte Version mit vier Komponenten. [The Test Anxiety Inventory TAI-G: an expanded and modified version with four components]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5(2), 121–130.Google Scholar
  36. Hodapp, V., Rohrmann, S., & Ringeisen, T. (2011). Prüfungsangstfragebogen (PAF)[Test-Anxiety Questionnaire]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  37. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Irwing, P., & Lynn, R. (2005). Sex differences in means and variability on the progressive matrices in university students: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 96(4), 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson, D. N., & Rushton, J. P. (2006). Males have greater g: sex differences in general mental ability from 100,000 17- to 18-year-olds on the scholastic assessment test. Intelligence, 34(5), 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: a cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leeson, P., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2008). Cognitive ability, personality, and academic performance in adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 630–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leonard, D. K., & Jiang, J. (1999). Gender bias and the college predictions of the SATs: a cry of despair. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis, J. C., & Hoover, H. D. (1987). Differential prediction of academic achievement in elementary and junior high school by sex. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 7(1), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Amthauer, R. (2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R [Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R] (2nd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  47. Lu, L., Weber, H. S., Spinath, F. M., & Shi, J. (2011). Predicting school achievement from cognitive and non-cognitive variables in a Chinese sample of elementary school children. Intelligence, 39, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCarthy, J. M., & Goffin, R. D. (2005). Selection test anxiety: exploring tension and fear of failure across the sexes in simulated selection scenarios. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(4), 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mouw, J. T., & Khanna, R. K. (1993). Prediction of academic success: a review of the literature and some recommendations. College Student Journal, 27(3), 328–336.Google Scholar
  50. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: a meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S., et al. (1996). Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Petrides, K. V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Frederickson, N., & Furnham, A. (2005). Explaining individual differences in scholastic behaviour and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schuler, H., & Prochaska, M. (2000). Entwicklung und Konstruktvalidierung eines berufsbezogenen Leistungsmotivationstests. [Development and construct validation of a job-related achievement motivation test]. Diagnostica, 46(2), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schuler, H., Prochaska, M., & Frintrup, A. (2001). Leistungsmotivationsinventar (LMI) [achievement motivation inventory]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  58. Schuler, H., Thornton, G. C., III, Frintrup, A., & Mueller-Hanson, R. (2004). Achievement motivation inventory (AMI). Ashland: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  59. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (Eds.) (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen [Scales for the assessment of teacher and student characteristics]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  60. Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: a meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shen, C., & Pedulla, J. J. (2000). The relationship between students’ achievement and their self-perception of competence and rigour of mathematics and science: a cross-national analysis. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 7(2), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spinath, B., Freudenthaler, H. H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2010). Domain-specific school achievement in boys and girls as predicted by intelligence, personality and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 481–486.Google Scholar
  64. Spinath, F. M., Spinath, B., & Plomin, R. (2008). The nature and nurture of intelligence and motivation in the origins of sex differences in elementary school achievement. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Statistisches Bundesamt (2010). Bildung und Kultur: Allgemeinbildende Schulen. (Fachserie 11 Reihe 1 No. 2110100107004). Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/BildungForschungKultur/Schulen/AllgemeinbildendeSchulen2110100107004,property=file.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011.
  66. Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2007). Predicting school achievement from motivation and personality. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21(3/4), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: what are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steinmayr, R., Beauducel, A., & Spinath, B. (2010). Do sex differences in a faceted model of fluid and crystallized intelligence depend on the method applied? Intelligence, 38(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Bundy, D. A. (2001). The predictive value of IQ. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strand, S., Deary, I. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Sex differences in cognitive abilities test scores: a UK national picture. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stricker, L. J., Rock, D. A., & Burton, N. W. (1993). Sex differences in predictions of college grades from scholastic aptitude test scores. Journal of Education and Psychology, 85(4), 710–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, J. O., & Schuler, H. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the big five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215(2), 132–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van Langen, A., Rekers-Mombarg, L., & Dekkers, H. (2006). Sex–related differences in the determinants and process of science and mathematics choice in pre–university education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Veldman, D. J. (1968). Effects of sex, aptitudes, and attitudes on the academic achievement of college freshmen. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5(3), 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Young, J. W., & Kobrin, J. L. (200). Differential validity, differential prediction, and college admission testing: a comprehensive review and analysis. (College Board No. 2001–6). New York: College Board.Google Scholar
  77. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: the state of the art. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  78. Zwick, R. (2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franziska Fischer
    • 1
  • Johannes Schult
    • 1
  • Benedikt Hell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations