Advertisement

European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 523–538 | Cite as

Differences in elementary school achievement between girls and boys: Does the teacher gender play a role?

  • Josip Burusic
  • Toni Babarovic
  • Maja Seric
Article

Abstract

Elementary schools in many countries record an unequal representation of male and female teachers with female teachers in huge majority. At the same time, numerous studies reveal that girls generally outmatch boys in the majority of school subjects. Consequently, possible effects of teacher–pupil gender interaction are becoming an important topic in studies on pupils’ school achievement. The aim of the present study was to examine the proposed teacher–pupil gender interaction effect on pupils’ school achievement in Croatian elementary schools. The nationwide sample of pupils and their teachers from all 844 Croatian elementary schools was used. There were 48,232 pupils at the age 10 and 46,196 pupils at the age 14 in the research. Two types of pupils’ school achievement measures were assessed—school marks and standardized knowledge tests for almost all subjects in school curriculum. Results indicate that girls generally outmatch boys by school marks, whereas results are equivocal when standardized tests were used. The teachers’ gender effect measured by knowledge of their pupils reveal the superiority of female teachers, but only on standardized achievement tests. The interaction effects of teachers’ and pupils’ gender on school achievement are generally insignificant. The stability of these results was confirmed in both age cohorts and assumption that differences in boys’ and girls’ school achievement are related to teachers’ gender cannot be supported within Croatian elementary education.

Keywords

School achievement Elementary school Student–teacher gender interaction School marks National testing 

Notes

References

  1. Abraham, J. (1989). Gender differences and anti-school boys. The Sociological Review, 37(1), 65–88. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.ep5475471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammermüller, A., & Dolton, P. (2006). Pupil–Teacher Gender Interaction Effects on Scholastic Outcomes in England and the USA. Center for European Economic Research. Discussion Paper No. 06-060.Google Scholar
  3. Babarović, T., Burušić, J., Šakić, M. (2009). Uspješnost predviđanja obrazovnih postignuća učenika osnovnih škola Republike Hrvatske. [Prediction of educational achievements of primary schools pupils in the Republic of Croatia], Društvena istraživanja, 18(4–5), 673–695.Google Scholar
  4. Boz, Y., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2006). Turkish prospective chemistry teachers’ beliefs about chemistry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1647–1667. doi: 10.1080/09500690500439132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratko, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Saks, Z. (2006). Personality and school performance: Incremental validity of self- and peer-ratings over intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burušić, J., Babarović, T., & Šakić, M. (2008a). Vanjsko vrednovanje obrazovnih postignuća u osnovnim školama Republike Hrvatske-učenici 4. razreda. [The external evaluation of educational achievement in Croatian primary schools—students, fourth grade]. Zagreb: Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar / National Center for the External Evaluation of Education.Google Scholar
  7. Burušić, J., Babarović, T., & Šakić, M. (2008b). Vanjsko vrednovanje obrazovnih postignuća u osnovnim školama Republike Hrvatske-učenici 8. razreda. [The external evaluation of educational achievement in Croatian primary schools—students, eighth grade]. Zagreb: Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar/National Center for the External Evaluation of Education.Google Scholar
  8. Burušić, J., Babarović, T., Šakić, M. (2009). Odrednice uspješnosti osnovnih škola u Republici Hrvatskoj: rezultati empirijske provjere. [Determinants of School Effectiveness in Primary Schools in the Republic of Croatia: Results of Empirical Investigation.] Društvena istraživanja, 18(4–5), 605–624.Google Scholar
  9. Buzhigeeva, M. I. (2004). Gender characteristics of children in the primary stage of instruction. Russian Education and Society, 46(4), 76–88.Google Scholar
  10. Carrier, S. J. (2009). Environmental education in the schoolyard: Learning styles and gender. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 2–12. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.40.3.2-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrington, B., & McPhee, A. (2008). Boys’ ‘underachievement’ and the feminization of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(2), 109–120. doi: 10.1080/02607470801979558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrington, B., & Skelton, C. (2003). Re-thinking ‘role models’: equal opportunities in teacher recruitment in England and Wales. Journal of Education Policy, 18(3), 253–265. doi: 10.1080/0268093032000081071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Skelton, C., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2007). Does the gender of the teacher really matter? Seven- to eight-year-olds’ accounts of their interactions with their teachers. Educational Studies, 33(4), 397–413. doi: 10.1080/03055690701423580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciarrochi, J., Heaven, P. C. L., & Davies, F. (2007). The impact of hope, self-esteem, and attributional style on adolescents’ school grades and emotional well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1161–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Cushman, P. (2007). The male teacher shortage: A synthesis of research and worldwide strategies for addressing the shortage. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 4, 79–98.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, M. R. (2007). Gender gap in GPAs seen as linked to self-discipline. Education Week, 26(23), 8–8.Google Scholar
  19. De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., De Bolle, M., & De Clercq, B. (2008). Sex differences in school performance as a function of conscientiousness, imagination and the mediating role of problem behavior. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 167–184. doi: 10.1002/per.675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dee, T. S. (2006). The why chromosone: How a teacher’s gender affects boys and girls. Education Next, 6(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
  22. Demie, F. (2001). Ethnic and gender differences in educational achievement and implications for school improvement strategies. Educational Research, 43(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1080/00131880110040968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Driessen, G. (2007). The feminization of primary education: effects of teachers’ sex on pupil achievement, attitudes and behavior. The Review of Education, 53, 183–203. doi: 10.1007/s11159-007-9039-y.Google Scholar
  24. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: Gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles, 45(9), 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. EACEA. Education, Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency (2010). Gender Differences in Educational Outcomes: Study on the Measures Taken and the Current Situation in Europe. Brussels: EACEA [online]. Available: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/120EN.pdf [June, 2010].
  27. Francis, B., Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2008). A perfect match? Pupils’ and teachers’ views of the impact of matching educators and learners by gender. Research Papers in Education, 23(1), 21–36. doi: 10.1080/02671520701692510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibb, S. J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). Gender differences in educational achievement to age 25. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 63–80.Google Scholar
  29. Hicks, B. M., Johnson, W., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2008). Moderating effects of personality on the genetic and environmental influences of school grades helps to explain sex differences in scholastic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 22, 247–268. doi: 10.1002/per.671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holmlund, H., & Sund, K. (2008). Is the gender gap in school performance affected by the sex of the teacher? Labour Economics, 15, 37–53. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2006.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchings, M., Carrington, B., Francis, B., Skelton, C., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2008). Nice and kind, smart and funny: what children like and want to emulate in their teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 135–157. doi: 10.1080/03054980701663959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparison of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein, J. (2004). Who is most responsible for gender differences in scholastic achievements: Pupils or teachers? Educational Research, 46(2), 183–193. doi: n10.1080/0013188042000222458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lahelma, E. (2005). School grades and other resources: The “Failing Boys” discourse revisited. Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 78–89. doi: 10.1080/08038740500365374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 441–451. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leeson, P., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2008). Cognitive ability, personality, and academic performance in adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 630–635. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maltby, J., Macaskill, A., & Day, L. (2007). Personality, individual differences and intelligence. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Cheng, J. H. S. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 78–95. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marzano, R. J. (2000). A new era of school reform: Going where the research takes us. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.Google Scholar
  40. Matthews, J. S., Cameron Ponitz, C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 689–704. doi: 10.1037/a0014240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meece, J., Bower Glienke, B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meelissen, M., & Luyten, H. (2008). The Dutch gender gap in mathematics: Small for achievement, substantial for beliefs and attitudes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mills, M., Martino, W., & Lingard, B. (2004). Attracting, recruiting and retaining male teachers: policy issues in the male teacher debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osborne, J. W. (2000). Advantages of hierarchical linear modeling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(1). Retrieved May 27, 2009 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=1
  45. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Vock, M. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 401–411. doi: 10.1002/pits.20154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Resing, W. C. M., Bleichrodt, N., & Dekker, P. H. (1999). Measuring personality traits in the classroom. European Journal of Personality, 13(6), 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simpson, A. W., & Erickson, M. T. (1983). Teachers’ verbal and nonverbal communication patterns as a function of teacher race, student gender, and student race. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 183–198.Google Scholar
  49. Skelton, C. (2003). Male primary teachers and perceptions of masculinity. Educational Review, 55(2), 195–209. doi: 10.1080/0013191032000072227.Google Scholar
  50. Spinath, F. M., Spinath, B., & Plomin, R. (2008). The nature and nurture of intelligence and motivation in the origins of sex differences in elementary school achievement. European Journal of Personality, 22, 211–229. doi: 10.1002/per.677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stake, J. E., & Katz, J. F. (1982). Teacher–pupil relationships in the elementary school classroom: teacher-gender and pupil-gender differences. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 465–471.Google Scholar
  52. Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185–209. doi: 10.1002/per.676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. UNESCO. (2000). Increasing the number of women teachers in rural schools: A synthesis of country case studies: South Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
  54. UNESCO. (2005). EFA global monitoring report 2005: The quality imperative. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  55. Yarborough, B. H., & Johnson, R. A. (1980). A six year study of sex differences in intellectual functioning, reading/language arts, achievement and affective development. The Journal of Psychology, 106, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Zagreb, CroatiaZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Croatian StudiesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations