Understanding motivation, engagement and experiences of intercultural interactions at university: a person-in-multiple contexts perspective
- 823 Downloads
The paucity of intercultural interactions among students from culturally diverse backgrounds at university and off campus is widely documented in the literature. A review of this empirical work, however, reveals narrow conceptualisations of the construct of intercultural interactions. Intercultural interactions are seldom conceptualised as part of complex, dynamic activity systems, and across multiple social contexts. Yet, intercultural interactions represent unique relational, socio-emotional and socio-cultural activities with their own, specific underlying cognitive, motivational and emotional dynamics. It is posited that activity theory (e.g. Engeström in Journal of Education and Work 14(1):133–156, 2001) provides a useful framework for interpreting students’ intercultural experiences, because of its emphasis on the evolving and complex interrelations between individuals and their surroundings—conceptualised as activity systems. The multiple contexts angle further stresses the overlapping and/or embedded nature of the activity systems that individuals simultaneously participate in. A series of empirical studies that incorporated quantitative methodologies for identifying meaningful patterns, and qualitative methodologies for gaining experiential insights into students’ intercultural experiences across multiple social contexts (i.e. formal on campus and informal, off campus) is presented. Methodological and conceptual issues related to studying the dynamics of motivational, cognitive and emotional aspects of intercultural interactions in activity systems and multiple contexts are addressed.
KeywordsMultiple contexts Activity theory Intercultural interactions Group work
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP0986901).
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
- Dasen, P. R. (2003). Theoretical frameworks in cross-cultural developmental psychology: an attempt at integration. In T. S. Saraswathi (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in human development: theory, research and applications. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
- De Vita, G. (2007). Taking stock. An appraisal of the literature on internationalising. In E. Jones & S. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 154–167). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Erlbaum (Original work published 1979).Google Scholar
- Gurtner, J.-L., Monnard, I., & Genoud, P. A. (2001). Towards a multilayer model of context and its impact on motivation. In S. Jävelä & S. Volet (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 189–208). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Henderson, J. (2009). “It’s all about give and take,” or is it? Where, when and how do native and non-native uses of English shape U.K. university students’ representations of each other and their learning experience? Journal of Studies in International Education. doi: 10.1177/1028315308329788.
- Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., Ward, C. J., & Campbell, S. S. (2008). Developing practices in multiple worlds: the role of identity in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 61–72.Google Scholar
- Kimmel, K., & Volet, S. E. (2011a). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards culturally diverse group work: does context matter? Journal of Studies in International Education. doi: 10.1177/1028315310373833.
- Kimmel, K., & Volet, S. E. (2011b). Intercultural interactions at university: new insights from an activity theory and multiple contexts perspective. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
- Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
- Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (vol. 15) (pp. 425–460). London: Emerald.Google Scholar
- Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: issues of theory, method and application (pp. 265–285). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Sidanius, J., Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The diversity challenge: social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). Identity negotiation theory: crossing cross-cultural boundaries. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 211–234). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Volet, S. E. (2001). Understanding learning and motivation in context: a multidimensional and multi-level cognitive–situative perspective. In S. E. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 57–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar