European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 527–543 | Cite as

Evaluating the reflexive practices in a learning experience

  • Andreina BrunoEmail author
  • Laura Galuppo
  • Silvia Gilardi


Reflexivity is a primary requirement for professional work. Our aim was to describe a methodology suitable for detecting the development of reflexive practice through the analysis of 59 Master’s degree students’ journals. We explore the use and changes of reflexive practice in relation to the settings and activities of the course using analysis of the mental language: We analyse how the reflexive practice is characterized, how it evolves through time and how it can be promoted. Data analysis shows that reflexivity is not monodimensional but multidimensional. Reflexive practice increases during the course: The different dimensions vary over time according to different organizational and educational conditions. This methodology allows us to formulate new hypotheses about which elements of the setting and process are effective in supporting participants’ reflexive practice.


Reflexivity Mental language Evaluation Professional development Learning Reflective journal 



  1. Allen, J. G. (2006). Mentalizing in practice. In J. G. Allen & P. Fonagy (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 1–30). Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonietti, A., Liverta Sempio, O., & Marchetti, A. (2006). Theory of mind and language in different developmental context. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1311–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, B. G., & O’Mahony, G. R. (2006). Developing a culture of reflection: Implication for school improvement. Reflective Practice, 7, 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses. The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 906–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28, 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Villiers, J. C., & Pyers, J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-believe understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think, revised edition. Boston: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  11. Fagnant, A., & Crahay, M. (2010). Theories of mind and personal epistemology: Their interrelation and connection with the concept of metacognition. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fellows, K., & Zimpher, N. L. (1988). Reflectivity and the instructional process: A definitional comparison between theory and practice. In H. C. Waxman, H. J. Freiburg, J. C. Vaughn, & M. Weil (Eds.), Images of reflection in teacher education (pp. 1–19). Reston: Association of Teacher Educators.Google Scholar
  13. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996). Playing with reality: Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77, 217–233.Google Scholar
  14. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilardi, S., & Lozza, E. (2009). Inquiry-based learning and undergraduates’ professional identity development: Assessment of a field research-based course. Innovative Higher Education, 34, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleaves, A., Walker, C., & Grey, J. (2008). Using digital and paper diaries for assessment and learning purposes in higher education: A case of critical reflection or constrained compliance? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbs, D. L., & Brand, C. F. (2005). The paper mirror: Understanding reflective journaling. Journal of Experiential Education, 28, 60–71.Google Scholar
  18. Hughes, C., Lecce, S., & Wilson, A. (2007). “Do you know what I want?” Preschoolers’ talk about desires, thoughts and feelings in their conversations with sibs and friends. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 330–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaneklin, C., & Olivetti Manoukian, F. (1990). Conoscere l’organizzazione. Milan: Carocci.Google Scholar
  21. Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, J., McKay, K., Sinclair, H., Tse, C., et al. (1999). Determining the level of reflective thinking from student’s written journals using a coding scheme based on work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18, 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., et al. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Wong, F. K. Y. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreber, C. (2005). Reflection on teaching and the scholarship of teaching: focus on science instructors. Higher Education, 50, 323–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lalonde, C. E., & Chandler, M. J. (2002). Children’s understanding of interpretation. New Ideas in Psychology, 20(2–3), 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lancia, F. (2004). Strumenti per l’analisi dei testi. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  27. Lecce, S. (2009). Theory of mind within real life context: The mental state talk. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, XXXVI(1), 21–50.Google Scholar
  28. Mamede, S., & Schmidt, H. (2004). The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Medical Education, 38, 1302–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2007). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23, 1–27.Google Scholar
  30. Mayo, J. A. (2004). Using mini autobiographical narration in applied psychology to personalize course content and improve conceptual application. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimension of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-believe understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moon, J. (1999). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Reynolds, M., & Vince, R. (Eds.). (2004). Organizing reflection. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  35. Sax, P. (2006). Developing preferred stories of identity as reflective practitioners. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 25, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sobral, D. T. (2001). Medical students reflection-in-learning in relation to approaches to study and academic achievement. Medical Teacher, 23, 508–513.Google Scholar
  39. Symons, D. K. (2004). Mental state discourse, theory of mind, and the internalization of self–other understanding. Developmental Review, 24, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warin, J., Maddock, M., Pell, A., & Hargreaves, L. (2006). Resolving identity dissonance through reflective and reflexive practice in teaching. Reflective Practice, 7, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wong, K., Kember, D., Chung, L., & Yan, L. (1995). Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zanobini, M., Scopesi, A., & Cattani, A. (1998). L’uso dei termini mentali in differenti contesti interattivi. In A. Scopesi & M. Zanobini (Eds.), Processi comunicativi e linguistici nei bambini e negli adulti: Prospettive evolutive e sociali. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropological Sciences, Psychology SectionUniversità degli Studi di GenovaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Department of Labour and Welfare StudiesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations