Advertisement

“FearNot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention

  • Natalie Vannini
  • Sibylle Enz
  • Maria Sapouna
  • Dieter Wolke
  • Scott Watson
  • Sarah Woods
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn
  • Lynne Hall
  • Ana Paiva
  • Elizabeth André
  • Ruth Aylett
  • Wolfgang Schneider
Article

Abstract

Bullying is widespread in European schools, despite multiple intervention strategies having been proposed over the years. The present study investigates the effects of a novel virtual learning strategy (“FearNot!”) to tackle bullying in both UK and German samples. The approach is intended primarily for victims to increase their coping skills and further to heighten empathy and defence of victims by non-involved bystanders. This paper focuses on the defender role. Applying quantitative as well as qualitative methodology, the present study found that “FearNot!” helped non-involved children to become defenders in the German sub-sample while it had no such effect in the UK sub-sample. German “New Defenders” (children who are initially uninvolved but are nominated as defenders by their peers after the intervention period) were found to be significantly more popular at baseline, and to show more cognitive empathy (Theory of Mind) for the virtual victims as compared to permanently non-involved pupils. Moreover, gender interacts with becoming a defender in its effects on affective empathy, with emotional contagion being particularly associated with New Defender status among girls. The findings are discussed in relation to previous research on anti-bullying intervention strategies and cultural differences in bullying prevalence rates and intervention outcomes.

Keywords

Empathy Peer intervention Role-play School bullying Virtual learning environment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the schools, teachers, and children who have taken part in this study. In addition we would like to thank the following researchers, without whom this study would not have been possible: Stefanie Brosch, Rafal Dawidowicz, Megan Davis, Joao Dias, Rui Figueiredo, Adrian Gordon, Marc Hall, Wan Ching Ho, Michael Kriegel, Karin Leichtenstern, Mey Yii Lim, Sandy Louchart, Asad Nazir, Chystopher Nehaniv, Luis Oliveira, Malcolm Padmore, Matthias Rehm, Paola Rizzo, Harald Schaub, Tim Tisdale, Isabel Transoco, Marco Vala, Thurid Vogt, Marc Webster, and Carsten Zoll. Many thanks also to Katja Berberich, Anna-Verena Zeiser, Peter Kluge und Christian Welz for their assistance with data collection and entry.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the European Community (EC) and was funded by the eCIRCUS project IST-4-027656-STP with university partners Heriot-Watt, Hertfordshire, Sunderland, Warwick, Bamberg, Augsburg, Wuerzburg plus INESC-ID and Interagens. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this publication. It does not represent the opinion of the EC, and the EC is not responsible for any use that might be made of data appearing therein.

References

  1. Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: a nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, 118(1), 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aylett, R. S., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., & Vala, M. (2005). FearNot! - an experiment in emergent narrative. In T. Panayiotopoulos, J. Gratch, R. Aylett, D. Ballin, P. Olivier, & T. Rist (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents proceedings (pp. 305–316). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, L., Carlin, J. B., Thomas, L., Rubin, K., & Patton, G. (2001). Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. British Medical Journal, 323(7311), 480–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). HLM hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling with HLM/2 L and HLM/3 L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  6. Charach, A., Pepler, D., & Ziegler, S. (1995). Bullying at school: a Canadian perspective. Education Canada, 35, 12–18.Google Scholar
  7. Cierpka, M. (Ed.). (2001). FAUSTLOS - Ein Curriculum zur Prävention von aggressivem und gewaltbereitem Verhalten bei Kindern der Klassen 1 bis 3 [FAUSTLOS – a curriculum to prevent aggressive and violent behaviour among school children of classes 1 to 3]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  8. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behaviours and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. C. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy. A social psychological approach. Boulder CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1993). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar
  15. Dias, J., & Paiva, A. (2005). Feeling and reasoning: a computational model for emotional agents. Paper presented at 12th Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence (EPIA), December 5-8, in Covilhã, Portugal.Google Scholar
  16. Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., Fredriks, A. M., Vogels, T., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2006). Do bullied children get ill, or do ill children get bullied? a prospective cohort study on the relationship between bullying and health-related symptoms. Pediatrics, 117(5), 1568–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterley Journal of Developmental Psychology, 50, 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trail of the steps to respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, L., Woods, S., Aylett, R., Newall, L., & Paiva, A. (2005). Achieving empathic engagement through affective interaction with synthetic characters. Paper presented at Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), October 22–24, in Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  21. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkins, D., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hazler, R. J. (1996). Bystanders: an overlooked factor in peer on peer abuse. The Journal for the Professional Counsellor, 11(2), 11–23.Google Scholar
  24. Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In C. B. Kaesy (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 169–217). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hollin, C. R., & Tower, P. (Eds.). (1986). Handbook of social skill training (vols. 1 and 2). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  27. Steinmetz, M., & Holz-Ebeling, F. (1995). Wie brauchbar sind die vorliegenden Fragebogen zur Messung von Empathie? Kritische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung der Iteminhalte. [How useful are current questionnaires of empathy measurement? a critical analysis considering the contents of items]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 16, 11–32.Google Scholar
  28. Hungerige, H., & Borg-Laufs, M. (2001). Rollenspiel. [Role-play]. In M. Borg-Laufs (Ed.), Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie mit Kindern und Jugendlichen, Band II: Methoden (pp. 247–299). Tübingen: dgvt.Google Scholar
  29. Jeffrey, L. R., Miller, D., & Linn, M. (2001). Middle school bullying as a context for the development of passive observers to the victimization of others. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jupp, J. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (1990). Self-concept changes in shy, socially isolated adolescents following social skills training emphasising role-plays. Australian Psychologist, 25, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. L’Abate, L., & Milan, M. A. (Eds.). (1985). Handbook of social skill training and research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Latané, B., & Darley, J. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: implications for educators (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  34. Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., Ruan, W. J., & The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Bullying Analyses Working Group. (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(8), 730–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olweus, D. (1996). Gewalt in der Schule [Bullying at Schools]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  37. Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Olweus, D. (2004). The Olweus bullying prevention programme: design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: how successful can interventions be? (pp. 13–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peery, J. (1979). Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: a reconceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. Child Development, 50, 1231–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1992). Bullying among Australian school children: reported behaviour and attitudes towards victims. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodkin, P. C. (2004). Peer ecologies of aggression and bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools (pp. 87–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398–419). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behaviour in connection with bullying in schools: a two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sapouna, M., Wolke, D., Vannini, N., Watson, S., Woods, S., Schneider, W., et al. (2009). Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in primary school: a controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(1), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schäfer, M., & Korn, S. (2004). Bullying als Gruppenphänomen: Eine Adaption des „Participant Role“-Ansatzes. [Bullying as group phenomenon: an adaptation of the „participant-role“approach]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., & Petermann, F. (2003). Bullying unter Schülern. Erscheinungsformen, Risikobedingungen und Interventionskonzepte. Göttingen: [Bullying among pupils: forms, risk factors and intervention approaches]. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  49. Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schreier, A., Wolke, D., Thomas, K., Horwood, J., Hollis, C., Gunnell, D., et al. (2009). Prospective study of peer victimization in childhood and psychotic symptoms in a nonclinical population at age 12 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(5), 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schuster, B. (1997). Bullying in der Schule: Ein Überblick über die Forschung. und Anregungen aus verwandten Forschungstraditionen [Bullying at school: an overview of research results and suggestions of related research traditions]. Empirische Pädagogik, 11, 315–325.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, P. K., Sharp, S., Eslea, M., & Thompson, D. (2004). England: The Sheffield Project. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? (pp. 99–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stassen Berger, K. (2007). Update on bullying at school: science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27(1), 90–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: an adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tapper, K., & Boulton, M. J. (2005). Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1(2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Mets, M. (1991). Rollenspiel effektiv [Effective role play]. München: Ehrenwirth.Google Scholar
  58. von Marées, N., & Petermann, F. (2008). Erhebung von Bullying im Kindergarten- und Grundschulalter: Ein Review [assessment of bullying in kindergarten and primary school age: a review]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 55, 161–174.Google Scholar
  59. Watson, S., Vannini, N., Davis, M., Woods, S., Hall, M., Hall, L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2007). FearNot! an anti-bullying intervention: Evaluation of an interactive virtual learning environment. Paper presented at Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), April 2–4. Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
  60. Watson, S., Vannini, N., Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Sapouna, M., Enz, S., et al. (2010). Inter-cultural differences in response to a computer based anti-bullying intervention. Educational Research, 52(1), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Standford, K., & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92(4), 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woods, S., Hall, L., Sobral, D., Dautenhahn, K., & Wolke, D.(2003). Animated characters in bullying intervention. Paper presented at Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA), September 15–17, in Irsee, Germany.Google Scholar
  64. Wright, P. R. (2006). Drama education and development of self: myth or reality? Social Psychology of Education, 9, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie Vannini
    • 1
  • Sibylle Enz
    • 2
  • Maria Sapouna
    • 3
  • Dieter Wolke
    • 3
  • Scott Watson
    • 4
  • Sarah Woods
    • 4
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn
    • 5
  • Lynne Hall
    • 6
  • Ana Paiva
    • 7
  • Elizabeth André
    • 8
  • Ruth Aylett
    • 9
  • Wolfgang Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of WuerzburgWuerzburgGermany
  2. 2.Gruppe fuer Interdisziplinaere PsychologieUniversitaet BambergBambergGermany
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  4. 4.School of PsychologyUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK
  5. 5.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK
  6. 6.Department of Computing, Engineering and TechnologyUniversity of SunderlandSunderlandUK
  7. 7.INESC-IDInstituto Superior TécnicoLisbonPortugal
  8. 8.Institut fuer InformatikUniversitaet AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  9. 9.School of Maths and Computer ScienceHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations