Advertisement

acta ethologica

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 51–60 | Cite as

The effects of previous experience and current condition on status contests in the bluebanded goby (Lythrypnus dalli)

  • Tessa K. Solomon-LaneEmail author
  • Matthew S. Grober
Original Paper

Abstract

Social status can change over a lifetime and affect fitness. Status transitions are often influenced by previous experience such that previous winners tend to dominate in future interactions, while losers tend to remain subordinate. We investigated the role of social status experience on future status contests in the bluebanded goby (Lythrypnus dalli), a highly social, sex-changing fish. Female L. dalli were given long-term experience as alpha (dominant) or beta (subordinate) in a stable social group of three fish (two females, one dominant male). We hypothesized that females with previous dominance experience would be more likely to become dominant in a novel context and change sex, a status-dependent transition. We found that in size-matched pairs, half of the previous alphas and half of the previous betas established and maintained dominance in the novel pair. Previous betas were more likely to become dominant in pairs with small relative differences in physical condition. Betas that initiated more interactions with the male in the stable group were also more likely to become dominant. Experience only had a transient effect on agonistic behavior during status establishment. In pairs in which the previous beta established dominance, individual agonistic efficiency, or the proportion of their approaches that led to a displacement, was lower. There was no long-term effect of experience on the rate of sex change. These data suggest that long-term tenure as a subordinate does not, itself, prevent status ascension and that physical condition and individual behavior are relevant factors that influence L. dalli contests.

Keywords

Agonistic efficiency Condition index Sex change Social experience Social status Winner and loser effects 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Devaleena Pradhan, Madelyne Willis, Kim Connor, Pierre Naude, and Ravi Batra for assistance processing and caring for fish and conducting behavioral observations. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation grant to MSG (IOB-0548567), a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (1311303), Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research, Georgia State Dissertation Grant, and Honeycutt Fellowship to TKSL, and by the Georgia State University Neuroscience Institute, Department of Biology, and Brains & Behavior Program.

Compliance with ethical standards

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of Georgia State University, at which the studies were conducted (IACUC protocol #A13023).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Béarez P, Bujard JT, Campoverde R (2007) Description of four small reef fishes from Ecuador: Oxycirrhites typus (Cirrhitidae), Acanthemblemaria balanorum (Chaenopsidae), Arcos decoris (Gobiesocidae) and Lythrypnus dalli (Gobiidae). Cybium 31:477–479Google Scholar
  2. Beaugrand J, Goulet C (2000) Distinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in males of green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri). Behav Process 50:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaugrand J, Goulet C, Payette D (1991) Outcome of dyadic conflict in male green swordtail fish, Xiphophorus helleri: effects of body size and prior dominance. Anim Behav 41:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behrents K (1983) The comparative ecology and interactions between two sympatric gobies (Lythrypnus dalli and Lythrypnus zebra). University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Black M, Moore B, Canario A, Ford D, Reavis R, Grober M (2005) Reproduction in context: field testing a laboratory model of socially controlled sex change in Lythrypnus dalli (Gilbert). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 318:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briffa M, Elwood RW (2010) Repeated measures analysis of contests and other dyadic interactions: problems of semantics, not statistical validity. Anim Behav 80:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cloutier S, Newberry RC (2000) Recent social experience, body weight and initial patterns of attack predict the social status attained by unfamiliar hens in a new group. Behaviour 137:705–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colléter M, Brown C (2011) Personality traits predict hierarchy rank in male rainbowfish social groups. Anim Behav 81:1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drews C (1993) The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour 125:283–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drummond H, Canales C (1998) Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects. Anim Behav 55:1669–1676. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0714 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Drummond H, Osorno J (1992) Training siblings to be submissive losers: dominance between booby nestlings. Anim Behav 44:881–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugatkin L, Druen M (2004) The social implications of winner and loser effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S488–S489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earley R, Dugatkin L (2006) Merging social hierarchies: effects on dominance rank in male green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri). Behav Process 73:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis L (1995) Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: a cross-species comparison. Ethol Sociobiol 16:257–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emlen D (2008) The evolution of animal weapons. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:387–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franck D, Ribowski A (1987) Influences of prior agonistic experiences on aggression measures in the male swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri). Behaviour 217–240Google Scholar
  17. Franck D, Ribowski A (1989) Escalating fights for rank-order position between male swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri): effects of prior rank-order experience and information transfer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gammell M, Hardy I (2003) Contest duration: sizing up the opposition? Trends Ecol Evol 18:491–493. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00222-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofmann HA, Benson ME, Fernald RD (1999) Social status regulates growth rate: consequences for life-history strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14171–14176PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33. doi: 10.1017/S146479310500686X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang B, Wey TW, Blumstein DT (2011) Correlates and consequences of dominance in a social rodent. Ethology 117:573–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01909.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonart LM, Hill GE, Badyaev AV (2007) Fighting ability and motivation: determinants of dominance and contest strategies in females of a passerine bird. Anim Behav 74:1675–1681. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. López P, Martín J (2001) Fighting rules and rival recognition reduce costs of aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenzi V (2009) The behavioral neuroendocrinology of fish sex change: the role of steroids and monoamines. Georgia State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorenzi V, Earley RL, Grober MS (2006) Preventing behavioural interactions with a male facilitates sex change in female bluebanded gobies, Lythrypnus dalli. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorenzi V, Earley RL, Grober MS (2012) Differential responses of brain, gonad and muscle steroid levels to changes in social status and sex in a sequential and bidirectional hermaphroditic fish. PLoS One 7:e51158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051158.t003 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McDonald AL, Heimstra NW, Damkot DK (1968) Social modification of agonistic behaviour in fish. Anim Behav 16:437–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller DJ, Lea RN (1972) Guide to the coastal marine fishes of California. Fish Bull 157Google Scholar
  29. Nelson-Flower MJ et al (2013) Costly reproductive competition between females in a monogamous cooperatively breeding bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20130728. doi: 10.1038/nature08614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reavis R, Grober M (1999) An integrative approach to sex change: social, behavioural and neurochemical changes in Lythrypnus dalli (Pisces). Acta Ethol 2:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reddon AR, Hurd PL (2009) Differences in aggressive behavior between convict cichlid color morphs: amelanistic convicts lose even with a size advantage. Acta Ethol 12:49–53. doi: 10.1007/s10211-009-0054-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodgers EW, Drane SL, Grober MS (2005) Sex reversal in pairs of Lythrypnus dalli: behavioral and morphological changes. Biol Bull 208:120–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodgers EW, Earley RL, Grober MS (2007) Social status determines sexual phenotype in the bi-directional sex changing bluebanded goby Lythrypnus dalli. J Fish Biol 70:1660–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saltzman W, Schultz-Darken N, Abbott D (1996) Behavioural and endocrine predictors of dominance and tolerance in female common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Anim Behav 51:657–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schuett G (1997) Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 54:213–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Silk JB et al (2009) The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3099–3104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simmons LW (1986) Inter-male competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav 34:567–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solomon-Lane T, Crespi EJ, Grober MS (2013) Stress and serial adult metamorphosis: multiple roles for the stress axis in socially regulated sex change. Front Neurosci 7:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Solomon-Lane T, Willis MC, Pradhan DS, Grober MS (2014) Female, but not male, agonistic behaviour is associated with male reproductive success in stable bluebanded goby (Lythrypnus dalli) hierarchies. Behaviour 151:1367–1387. doi: 10.1163/1568539x-00003188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. St Mary C (1996) Sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, the zebra goby Lythrypnus zebra: insights gained through a comparison with its sympatric congener, Lythrypnus dalli. Environ Biol Fish 45:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. St. Mary C (1993) Novel sexual patterns in two simultaneously hermaphroditic gobies, Lythrypnus dalli and Lythrypnus zebra. Copeia 4:1062–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steele MA (1996) Effects of predators on reef fishes: separating cage artifacts from effects of predation. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 198:249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevenson RD, Woods WA (2006) Condition indices for conservation: new uses for evolving tools. Integr Comp Biol 46:1169–1190. doi: 10.1093/icb/icl052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wey TW, Burger JR, Ebensperger LA, Hayes LD (2013) Reproductive correlates of social network variation in plurally breeding degus (Octodon degus). Anim Behav 85:1407–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.035 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Whiteman E, Côté I (2004) Dominance hierarchies in group-living cleaning gobies: causes and foraging consequences. Anim Behav 67:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson E (1980) Sociobiology: the abridged edition. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Young AJ, Carlson AA, Monfort SL, Russell AF, Bennett NC, Clutton-Brock T (2006) Stress and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12005–12010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510038103 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Neuroscience InstituteGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations