acta ethologica

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 83–88 | Cite as

Hissing calls improve survival in incubating female great tits (Parus major)

  • Indrikis Krams
  • Jolanta Vrublevska
  • Kaarin Koosa
  • Tatjana Krama
  • Pranas Mierauskas
  • Markus J. Rantala
  • Vallo Tilgar
Original Article

Abstract

Nest predation is among the most important selective pressure shaping nest-site selection and nest defense behavior in many avian species. In this study, we tested whether the production of one such nest defense behavior—hissing calls—may improve survival of incubating female great tits (Parus major). We found that 72.5 % of incubating females gave hissing calls when they were exposed to a stuffed woodpecker in their nest boxes. The repeatability of the number of hissing calls given was high, as was the latency to give the call. Additionally, natural nest predators attacked hissing and nonhissing females equally often. However, hissing females survived better than silent females. We tested responses of feral cats to playbacks of hissing call during their attacks of nest boxes and found that hissing calls prevented the predator attacks. Taken together, our findings indicate that hissing calls can deter predator attacks and potentially increase survival rates of nesting great tits or their offspring, or both. The propensity to give hissing calls may be related to personality type of incubating female great tits, which needs to be tested experimentally.

Keywords Hissing call Nest defense Female mortality Antipredator behavior Great tit 

References

  1. Allander K (1997) Reproductive investment and parasite susceptibility in the great tit. Funct Ecol 11:358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel KM, Weise CM (1986) The hiss-display of nestling black-capped chickadees in captivity. Wilson Bull 98:320–321Google Scholar
  3. Beauchamp G (2003) Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms. Behav Process 64:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branch CL, Freeberg TM (2012) Distress calls in tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor): are conspecifics or predators the target? Behav Ecol 23:854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994) The birds of the western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Czeszczewik D, Walankiewicz W, Stanska M (2008) Small mammals in nests of cavity-nesting birds: why should ornithologists study rodents? Can J Zool 86:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2010) Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:3947–3958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drent PJ, van Oers K, Noordwijk AJ (2003) Realized heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellison K, Ribic C (2012) Nest defence-grassland bird responses to snakes. USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Paper 252Google Scholar
  12. Fontaine JJ, Martin TE (2006) Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies. Ecol Lett 9:428–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Groothuis TGG, Carere C (2005) Avian personalities: characterization and epigenesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:137–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haff TM, Magrath RD (2011) Calling at a cost: elevated nestling calling attracts predators to active nests. Biol Lett 7:493–495PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haff TM, Magrath RD (2013) Eavesdropping on the neighbours: fledglings learn to respond to heterospecific alarm calls. Anim Behav 85:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartke KM, Grand JB, Hepp GR, Folk TH (2006) Sources of variation in survival of breeding female wood ducks. Condor 108:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Igaune K, Krams I, Krama T, Bobkova J (2008) White storks Ciconia ciconia eavesdrop on mating calls of moor frogs Rana arvalis. J Avian Biol 39:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly LA, Coe RL, Madden JR, Healy SD (2008) Vocal mimicry in songbirds. Anim Behav 76:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krama T, Krams I (2005) Cost of mobbing call to breeding pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol 16:37–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krams I (1998) Dominance-specific vigilance in the great tit. J Avian Biol 29:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krams I, Cirule D, Krama T, Vrublevska J (2011) Extremely low ambient temperature affects haematological parameters and body condition in wintering great tits (Parus major). J Ornithol 152:889–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krams I, Cirule D, Suraka V, Krama T, Rantala MJ, Ramey G (2010) Fattening strategies of wintering Great Tits support the optimal body mass hypothesis under condition of extremely low ambient temperature. Funct Ecol 24:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krams I, Cirule D, Vrublevska J, Nord A, Rantala MJ, Krama T (2013a) Nocturnal loss of body reserves reveals high survival risk for subordinate great tits wintering at extremely low ambient temperatures. Oecologia 172:339–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krams I, Krama T, Igaune K, Mand R (2007) Long-lasting mobbing of the pied flycatcher increases the risk of nest predation. Behav Ecol 18:1082–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krams I, Vrublevska J, Cirule D, Kivleniece I, Krama T, Rantala MJ, Kaasik A, Horak P, Sepp T (2013b) Stress, behaviour and immunity in wild-caught wintering great tits (Parus major). Ethology 119:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Labra A, Sufan-Catalan J, Solis R, Penna M (2007) Hissing sounds by the lizard Pristidactylus volcanensis. Copeia 4:1019–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lima SL (2009) Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev 84:485–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Löhrl H (1964) Verhaltensmerkmale der Gattungen Parus (Meisen), Aegithalos (Schwanzmeisen), Sitta (Kleiber), Tichodroma (Mauerläufer) und Certhia (Baumläufer). J Ornithol 105:151–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Low M, Arlt D, Eggers S, Pärt T (2010) Habitat-specific differences in adult survival rates and its links to parental workload and on-nest predation. J Anim Ecol 79:214–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundberg A, Alatalo RV (1992) The pied flycatcher. T. and A.D, Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Magrath RD, Haff TM, Horn AG, Leonard ML (2010) Calling in the face of danger: predation risk and acoustic communication by parent birds and their offspring. In: Brockmann HJ, Roper TJ, Naguib M, WynneEdwards KE, Mitani JC, Simmons LW (eds) Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol 41, Vol., pp 187–253Google Scholar
  34. Martin TE (1995) Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecol Monogr 65:101–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin TE, Li PJ (1992) Life history traits of open- vs cavity-nesting birds. Ecology 73:579–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moe B, Langseth I, Fyhn M, Gabrielsen GW, Bech C (2002) Changes in body condition in breeding kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla. J Avian Biol 33:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nilsson SG (1984) The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the impact of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scand 15:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orell M (1989) Population fluctuations and survival of great tits Parus major dependent on food supplied by man in winter. Ibis 131:112–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Owings DH, Rowe MP, Rundus AS (2002) The rattling sound of rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) as a communicative resource for ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) and burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia). J Comp Psychol 116:197–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perrins CM (1979) British tits. Collin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2005) Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour 142:1377–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rainey MM, Grether GF (2007) Competitive mimicry: synthesis of a neglected class of mimetic relationships. Ecology 88:2440–2448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ricklefs RE (1969) An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  45. Rytkönen S, Krams I (2003) Does foraging behaviour explain the poor breeding success of great tits Parus major in northern Europe? J Avian Biol 34:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sandercock BK, Beissinger SR, Stoleson SH, Melland RR, Hughes CR (2000) Survival rates of a neotropical parrot: implications for latitudinal comparisons of avian demography. Ecology 81:1351–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schuett W, Tregenza T, Dall SRX (2010) Sexual selection and animal personality. Biol Rev 85:217–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sibley CG (1955) Behavioral mimicry in the Titmice (Paridae) and certain other birds. Wilson Bull 67:128–132Google Scholar
  49. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sih A, Bell AM (2008) Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol 38. Academic Press, pp 227–281Google Scholar
  51. Solheim R (1984) Caching behaviour, prey choice and surplus killing by Pygmy owls Glaucidium passerinum during winter, a functional response of a generalist predator. Ann Zool Fenn 21:301–308Google Scholar
  52. Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  54. Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Amer Zool 14:249–264Google Scholar
  55. van den Brink V, Dolivo V, Falourd X, Dreiss A, Roulin A (2012) Melanic color-dependent antipredator behavior strategies in barn owl nestlings. Behav Ecol 23:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Oers K, Drent PJ, de Goede P, van Noordwijk AJ (2004) Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proc Royal Soc London B 271:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vehrencamp S (1978) The adaptive significance of communal nesting in Groove-billed anis (Crotophaga sulcirostris). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Verbeek MEM, Boon A, Drent PJ (1996) Exploration, aggressive behavior and dominance in pair-wise confrontations of juvenile male great tits. Behaviour 133:945–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verbeek MEM, Drent PJ, Wiepkema PR (1994) Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits. Anim Behav 48:1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wesolowski T (2002) Anti-predator adaptations in nesting Marsh tits Parus palustris: the role of nest-site security. Ibis 144:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Indrikis Krams
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jolanta Vrublevska
    • 1
  • Kaarin Koosa
    • 2
  • Tatjana Krama
    • 1
  • Pranas Mierauskas
    • 3
  • Markus J. Rantala
    • 4
  • Vallo Tilgar
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Systematic BiologyUniversity of DaugavpilsDaugavpilsLatvia
  2. 2.Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  3. 3.Environmental Management CentreMykolas Romeris UniversityVilniusLithuania
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations