Advertisement

acta ethologica

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 25–31 | Cite as

Interpopulational variation of the mating system in the peacock blenny Salaria pavo

  • João L. Saraiva
  • Giulia Pignolo
  • David GonçalvesEmail author
  • Rui F. Oliveira
Original Paper

Abstract

The ecology and mating system of two populations of the peacock blenny Salaria pavo that have been reported to differ in sexual behaviour were studied. In the Gulf of Trieste, a northern Adriatic Sea population lives in rocky shores, whilst in the Ria Formosa, an Atlantic population inhabits a coastal lagoon with sandy barrier islands. In the Gulf of Trieste, nest availability was found to be higher and nest aggregation lower than in Ria Formosa. Nesting males courted females more and in higher proportion, and inversely, females directed less courtship displays towards nest holders in the Gulf of Trieste than in Ria Formosa. The relative frequency of small female-like males that reproduce by parasitically fertilizing eggs in the larger males’ nests was lower in the Gulf of Trieste population. This variation in the sexual behaviour of nesting males and females is likely to reflect a plastic behavioural response to the varying ecological conditions. The difference between populations in the relative frequency of parasitic males suggests that the male alternative reproductive tactics are condition-dependent.

Keywords

Breeding Season Nest Site Artificial Reef Parasitic Male Secondary Sexual Character 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. JLS thanks Chioggia Hydrobiological Station and the staff of the Department of Biology of the University of Trieste, the Miramare Marine Reserve and Stefano Savio. JR and VA appreciate the skilful technical assistance provided by S. Chenu. JLS was supported by a Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) PhD fellowship (SFRH/BD/10764/2002). This study was funded by the grants POCTI/BSE/38395/2001 and PTDC/MAR/69749/2006 from FCT, the European Commission FEDER Program and the FCT Plurianual Program (R&D unit MAR-LVT-Lisboa-331).

References

  1. Ahnesjö I, Kvarnemo C, Merilaita S (2001) Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate. Behavioral Ecology 12:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almada VC, Gonçalves EJ, Santos AJ, Baptista C (1994) Breeding ecology and nest aggregation in a population of Salaria pavo (Pisces:Blenniidae) in an area where nest sites are very scarce. Journal of Fish Biology 45:819–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almada VC, Gonçalves EJ, Oliveira RF, Santos AJ (1995) Courting females: ecological constraints affect sex roles in a natural population of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Animal Behaviour 49:1125–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197(4300):215–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fishelson L (1963) Observations on littoral fishes of Israel. II. Larval development and metamorphosis of Blennius pavo Risso (Teleostei, Blenniidae). Israel Journal of Zoology 12:81–91Google Scholar
  8. Forsgren E, Amundsen T, Borg AA, Bjelvenmark J (2004) Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 429:551–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC (1997) Sex differences in resource utilization by the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 51:624–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goncalves D, Teles M, Alpedrinha J, Oliveira RF (2008) Brain and gonadal aromatase activity and steroid hormone levels in female and polymorphic males of the peacock blenny Salaria pavo. Hormones and Behavior 54(5):717–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC, Oliveira RF, Santos AJ (1996) Female mimicry as a mating tactic in males of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonçalves D, Barata EN, Oliveira RF, Canário AVM (2002) The role of male visual and chemical cues on the activation of female courtship behaviour in the sex-role reversed peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 60:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonçalves D, Fagundes T, Oliveira RF (2003) Reproductive behaviour of sneaker males of the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 63:528–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonçalves D, Matos R, Fagundes T, Oliveira RF (2005) Bourgeois males of the peacock blenny, Salaria pavo, discriminate female mimics from females? Ethology 111:559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gowaty PA, Hubbell SP (2005) Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45(5):931–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolhuru GR, Grether GF (2004) The effects of resource availability on alternative mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology 16(1):294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kotrschal K (1988) Blennies and endolithic bivalves: differential utilization of shelter in Adriatic Blenniidae (Pisces: Teleostei). P S Z N I: Marine Ecology 9(3):253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. TREE 11(10):404–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I, Merilaita S (2001) Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate. Behavioral Ecology 12(4):397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliveira RF, Ros AFH, Gonçalves DM (2005) Intra-sexual variation in male reproduction in teleost fish: a comparative approach. Hormones and Behavior 48:430–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T (2001) Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:364–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Papaconstantinou CA (1979) Secondary sex characters of blennioid fishes (Pisces: Blenniidae). Thalassographica 3:57–75Google Scholar
  23. Patzner RA, Seiwald M, Adlgasser M, Kaurin G (1986) The reproduction of Blennius pavo (Teleostei, Blenniidae). V. Reproductive behavior in natural environment. Zool Anz 216(5/6):338–350Google Scholar
  24. Ruchon F, Laugier T, Quignard JP (1995) Alternative male reproductive strategies in the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 47:826–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saraiva JL, Barata EN, Canário AVM, Oliveira RF (2009) The effect of nest aggregation on the reproductive behaviour of the peacock blenny Salaria pavo (Risso). Journal of Fish Biology 74:754–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saraiva JL, Gonçalves D, Oliveira RF (2010) Environmental modulation of androgen levels and secondary sex characters in two populations of the peacock blenny Salaria pavo. Hormones and Behavior 57(2):192–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shibata J, Kohda M (2006) Seasonal sex role changes in the blenniid Petroscirtes breviceps, a nest brooder with paternal care. Journal of Fish Biology 12(1):203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taborsky M (1994) Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in Study of Behavior 23:1–100Google Scholar
  29. Taborsky M (1997) Bourgeois and parasitic tactics: do we need collective, functional terms for alternative reproductive behaviours? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:361–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taborsky M (1998) Sperm competition in fish: "bourgeois" males and parasitic spawning. TREE 13(6):222–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Taborsky M (2001) The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. Journal of Heredity 92:100–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weir LK, Grant JWA (2004) The causes of resource monopolization: interaction between resource dispersion and mode of competition. Ethology 110:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zander CD (1986) Blenniidae. In: Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E, Whithead H (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. UNESCO, Paris, pp 1096–1112Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag and ISPA 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • João L. Saraiva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giulia Pignolo
    • 3
  • David Gonçalves
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Rui F. Oliveira
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Instituto Superior de Psicologia AplicadaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Centro de Ciências do MarUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  3. 3.Environmental Chemistry and Risk Assessment Research Unit, Department of Chemical SciencesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  4. 4.Instituto Gulbenkian de CiênciaChampalimaud Neuroscience ProgrammeOeirasPortugal

Personalised recommendations