acta ethologica

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 103–110 | Cite as

Mating tactics of male feral goats (Capra hircus): risks and benefits

  • Fiona C. Saunders
  • Alan G. McElligott
  • Kamran Safi
  • Thomas J. Hayden
Original Article

Abstract

Intense competition between males for reproduction has led to the evolution of alternative mating tactics (AMTs). Feral goat males usually use a tactic called tending, in which they defend oestrous females from other males. Males may also use a second mating tactic called coursing, in which they gain access to oestrous females by disturbing a tending pair. Herein, we examine estimated mating success (EMS) and risks of using these tactics. Tending was only used by mature (≥4 years old), higher-ranking males and accounted for 75% of EMS. Coursing was used by males of all ages and dominance ranks, and accounted for 25% of EMS. Using coursing, male kids achieved 8% of EMS. Mature males achieved 92% of EMS. Both age and dominance rank were related to EMS, but age was not important after its relationship with dominance was controlled. Tending bouts were, on average, ca. 30 min long, while coursing bouts only averaged ca. 2 min. Males were more likely to suffer a butt while coursing than while tending, and formerly tending males were responsible for most butts. Kids that coursed had the highest risk of being butted. In most AMTs, there are reductions in the risks in relation to low fitness benefits. However, we found that the risks of butts during coursing were high, while our evidence suggests that the EMS was probably low. Nevertheless, the existence of an effective AMT in male feral goats may have an important influence on the intensity of sexual selection and the effective population size.

Keywords

Coursing Dominance Mating strategy Mating success Tending 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dúchas for permission to work in the Wicklow Mountains National Park and thank the Rangers and staff of the park for their valuable help. We thank the members of the Mammal Research Group and Department of Zoology, National University of Ireland, Dublin, and other volunteers who helped in the catching and tagging of the goats, and Noínín Reynolds for field assistance during the 1996 breeding season. We thank Marco Festa-Bianchet and two anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge the financial support of Dúchas, The Department of Education and Enterprise Ireland.

References

  1. Ahmad N, Noakes DE (1996) Sexual maturity in British breeds of goat kids. Br Vet J 152:93–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez F (1993) Risks of fighting in relation to age and territory holding in fallow deer. Can J Zool 71:376–383Google Scholar
  3. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Austad SN, Howard RH (1984) Introduction to the symposium: alternative reproductive tactics. Am Zool 24:307–308Google Scholar
  5. Bro-Jørgensen J (2002) Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9290–9293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bro-Jørgensen J, Durant SM (2003) Mating strategies of topi bulls: getting in the centre of attention. Anim Behav 65:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullock DJ (1991) Feral goat (Capra hircus). In: Corbet GB, Harris S (eds) The handbook of British mammals. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 541–547Google Scholar
  8. Bullock DJ, Pickering SP (1984) The validity of horn ring counts to determine the age of Scottish feral goats. J Zool (1965) 202:561–564Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Gibson RM, Guinness FE (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim Behav 27:211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coltman DW, Bancroft DR, Robertson A, Smith JA, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM (1999). Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol Ecol 8:1199–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Strobeck C (2002) Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dominey WJ (1984) Alternative mating tactics and evolutionary stable strategies. Am Zool 24:385–396Google Scholar
  13. Dunbar RIM, Buckland D, Miller D (1990) Mating strategies of male feral goats: a problem in optimal foraging. Anim Behav 40:653–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emlen S, Oring L (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Festa-Bianchet M (1987) Bighorn sheep, climbing accidents and implications for mating strategy. Mammalia 51:618–620Google Scholar
  16. Forsyth DM, Duncan RP, Tustin KG, Gaillard J-M (2005) A substantial energetic cost to male reproduction in a sexually dimorphic ungulate. Ecology 86:2154–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geist V (1971) Mountain sheep. A study in behaviour and evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogg JT (1984) Mating in bighorn sheep: multiple creative male strategies. Science 225:526–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hogg JT, Forbes SH (1997) Mating in bighorn sheep: frequent male reproduction via a high risk “unconventional” tactic. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isaac JL (2005) Mass loss during the mating season in male common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula): implications for age-specific variation in mating strategy. J Zool (1987) 266:181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komers PE, Birgersson B, Ekvall K (1999) Timing of estrus in fallow deer is adjusted to the age of available mates. Am Nat 153:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lucas JR, Howard RD (1995) On alternative reproductive tactics in anurans: dynamic games with density and frequency dependence. Am Nat 146:365–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. McElligott AG, Hayden TJ (2000) Lifetime mating success, sexual selection and life history of fallow bucks (Dama dama). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McElligott AG, Mattiangeli V, Mattiello S, Verga M, Reynolds CA, Hayden TJ (1998) Fighting tactics of fallow bucks (Dama dama, Cervidae): reducing the risks of serious conflict. Ethology 104:789–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McElligott AG, Gammell MP, Harty HC, Paini DR, Murphy DT, Walsh JT, Hayden TJ (2001) Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer: do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McElligott AG, Naulty F, Clarke WV, Hayden TJ (2003) The somatic cost of reproduction: what determines reproductive effort in prime-aged fallow bucks? Evol Ecol Res 5:1239–1250Google Scholar
  29. Nunney L (1993) The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47:1329–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelletier F (2005) Foraging time of rutting bighorn rams varies with individual behaviour, not mating tactic. Behav Ecol 16:280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Smith JA, Pilkington JG (1999) Molecular analysis of a promiscuous, fluctuating mating system. Biol J Linn Soc 68:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Wilson K (2001) Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409:681–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Wilson K (2003a) Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Wilson K (2003b) Soay rams target reproductive activity towards promiscuous females' optimal insemination period. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:2073–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rubenstein DI (1984) Resource acquisition and alternative mating strategies in water striders. Am Zool 24:345–353Google Scholar
  36. Saunders FC (2000) Mating system, seasonal breeding and survival of feral goats (Capra hircus) in the Wicklow Mountains, Ireland. Ph.D. thesis, National University of Ireland, DublinGoogle Scholar
  37. Shackleton DM, Shank CC (1984) A review of the social behaviour of feral and wild sheep and goats. J Anim Sci 58:500–509Google Scholar
  38. Stevenson IR, Bancroft DR (1995) Fluctuating trade-offs favour precocial maturity in male Soay sheep. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 262:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stockley P, Searle JB, Macdonald DW, Jones CS (1996) Correlates of reproductive success within alternative mating tactics of the common shrew. Behav Ecol 7:334–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Widemo F (1998) Alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff, Philomachus pugnax: a mixed ESS? Anim Behav 56:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yoccoz NG, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC (2002) Age- and density dependent reproductive effort in male red deer. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:1523–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag and ISPA 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona C. Saunders
    • 1
  • Alan G. McElligott
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kamran Safi
    • 2
  • Thomas J. Hayden
    • 1
  1. 1.Mammal Research Group, Department of ZoologyNational University of IrelandDublinIreland
  2. 2.Zoologisches InstitutUniversität ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Verhaltensbiologie, Zoologisches InstitutUniversität ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations