Advertisement

Understanding visually impaired people’s experiences of social signal perception in face-to-face communication

  • Shi Qiu
  • Pengcheng An
  • Jun Hu
  • Ting HanEmail author
  • Matthias Rauterberg
Long Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Social signals (e.g., facial expression, gestures) are important in social interactions. Most of them are visual cues, which are hardly accessible for visually impaired people, causing difficulties in their daily living. In human–computer interaction (HCI), assistive systems for social interactions are getting increasing attention due to related technological advancements. Yet, there is still lack of a comprehensive and vivid understanding of visually impaired people’s social signal perception to broadly identify their needs in face-to-face communication. To fill this gap, we conducted in-depth interviews to study the lived experiences of 20 visually impaired participants. We analyzed a rich set of qualitative empirical data based on a comprehensive taxonomy of social signals, using a standard qualitative content analysis method. Our results revealed a set of vivid examples and an overview of visually impaired people’s lived experiences regarding social signals, including both their capabilities and limitations. As reported, the participants perceived social signals through their compensatory modalities such as hearing, touch, smell, or obstacle sense. However, their perception of social signals is generally with low resolution and limited by certain environmental factors (e.g., crowdedness, or noise level of the surrounding). Interestingly, sight was still importantly relied on by low-vision participants in social signal perception (e.g., rough postures and gestures). Besides, the participants experienced difficulties in sensing others’ subtle emotional states which are often revealed by nuanced behaviors (e.g., a smile). Based on rich empirical findings, we propose a set of design implications to inform future-related HCI works aimed at supporting visually impaired users’ social signal perception.

Keywords

Face-to-face communication Social signals Visually impaired people Accessible technology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Gordon, Xiang Cheng, and Liang Zang for helping us organize the participants from Hong Kong Blind Union and Yangzhou Special Education School. This research is supported by the China Scholarship Council and facilitated by the Eindhoven University of Technology.

Author contribution

S Q, P A, J H contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization, “Visual impairment and blindness,” Oct-2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/. Accessed: 27-Dec-2017
  2. 2.
    Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., Bourlard, H.: Social signal processing: survey of an emerging domain. Image Vis. Comput. 27(12), 1743–1759 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Hasselt, V.B.: Social adaptation in the blind. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 3(1), 87–102 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goharrizi, Z.E.: Blindness and Initiating Communication. University of Oslo, Oslo (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffin, E.A.: A First Look at Communication Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naraine, M.D., Lindsay, P.H.: Social inclusion of employees who are blind or low vision. Disabil. Soc. 26(4), 389–403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kemp, N.J., Rutter, D.R.: Social interaction in blind people: an experimental analysis. Hum. Relat. 39(3), 195–210 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117(3), 497–529 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maslow, A.H.: Personality and Motivation. Harper, New York (1954)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brock, M., Kristensson, P. O.: Supporting blind navigation using depth sensing and sonification. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication, pp. 255–258. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galioto, G., Tinnirello, I., Croce, D., Inderst, F., Pascucci, F., Giarré, L.: Sensor fusion localization and navigation for visually impaired people. In: 2018 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 3191–3196. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Botzer, A., Shvalb, N.: Using sound feedback to help blind people navigate. In: Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Article 23, p. 3. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yusoh, S. M. N. S., Nomura, Y., Kokubo, N., Sugiura, T., Matsui, H., Kato, N.: Dual mode fingertip guiding manipulator for blind persons enabling passive/active line-drawing explorations. In: International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons, pp. 851–858. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goncu, C., Marriott, K.: GraCALC: an accessible graphing calculator. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, pp. 311–312. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prescher, D., Weber, G., Spindler, M.: A tactile windowing system for blind users. In: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pp. 91–98. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milne, L. R., Bennett, C. L., Ladner, R. E., Azenkot, S.: BraillePlay: educational smartphone games for blind children. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility, pp. 137–144. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shinohara, K. Wobbrock, J. O.: In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 705–714. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neto, L.B., Grijalva, F., Maike, V.R.M.L., Martini, L.C., Florencio, D., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Rocha, A., Goldenstein, S.: A kinect-based wearable face recognition system to aid visually impaired users. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 47(1), 52–64 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Astler, D. et al.: Increased accessibility to nonverbal communication through facial and expression recognition technologies for blind/visually impaired subjects. In: The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 259–260. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research And Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sears, A., Hanson, V.L.: Representing users in accessibility research. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2235–2238. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knapp, M., Hall, J., Horgan, T.: Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, 8th edn. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F.M., Angleitner, A.: Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86(4), 599–614 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kleck, R.E., Nuessle, W.: Congruence between the indicative and communicative functions of eye contact in interpersonal relations. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 7(4), 241–246 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cook, M., Smith, J.M.C.: The role of gaze in impression formation. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 14(1), 19–25 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arndt, H., Janney, R.W.: InterGrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Warren, D.H.: Blindness and Early Childhood Development. American Foundation for the Blind, Arlington (1977)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fraiberg, S.: Insights from the Blind: Comparative Studies of Blind and Sighted Infants. Basic Books, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kemp, N.J., Rutter, D.R.: Social interaction in blind people: an experimental analysis. Hum. Relat. 39(3), 195–210 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Krishna, S., Little, G., Black, J., Panchanathan, S.: A wearable face recognition system for individuals with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - Assets’05, pp. 216–217. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kramer, K. M., Hedin, D. S., Rolkosky, D. J.: Smartphone based face recognition tool for the blind. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC’10, pp. 4538–4541. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krishna, S., Panchanathan, S.: Assistive technologies as effective mediators in interpersonal social interactions for persons with visual disability. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2010, vol. 6180 LNCS, PART 2, pp. 316–323Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buimer, H. P., Bittner, M., Kostelijk, T., van der Geest, T. M., van Wezel, R. J., Zhao, Y.: Enhancing emotion recognition in vips with haptic feedback. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 157–163. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McDaniel, T., Bala, S., Rosenthal, J., Tadayon, R., Tadayon, A., Panchanathan, S.: Affective haptics for enhancing access to social interactions for individuals who are blind. In: International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 419–429. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bala, S., McDaniel, T., Panchanathan, S.: Visual-to-tactile mapping of facial movements for enriched social interactions. In: 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Games (HAVE) Proceedings, pp. 82–87. IEEE (2014Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Anam, A. I., Alam, S., Yeasin, M.: Expression: a dyadic conversation aid using Google Glass for people who are blind or visually impaired. In: 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services, pp. 57–64. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tanveer, M. I., Anam, A. S. M., Yeasin, M., Khan, M.: Do you see what I see?: designing a sensory substitution device to access non-verbal modes of communication. In: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, p. 8. Article 10 (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pentland, A.: Social signal processing exploratory DSP. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24(4), 108–111 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knapp, M.L., Hall, J.A., Horgan, T.G.: Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Richmond, V.P., McCroskey, J.C., Payne, S.K.: Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ambady, N., Rosenthal, R.: Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 111(2), 256–274 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Coulson, M.: Attributing emotion to static body postures: recognition accuracy, confusions, and viewpoint dependence. J. Nonverbal Behav. 28(2), 117–139 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Van den Stock, J., Righart, R., De Gelder, B.: Body expressions influence recognition of emotions in the face and voice. Emotion 7(3), 487–494 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Darwin, C.: 1965. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. John Marry, London (1872)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Keltner, D., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G.C., Beer, J.: Facial Expression of Emotion. Guilford Publications, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kleinke, C.L.: Gaze and eye contact. a research review. Psychol. Bull. 100(1), 78–100 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Scherer, K.R.: Vocal communication of emotion: a review of research paradigms. Speech Commun. 40(1–2), 227–256 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hall, E.T.: The Silent Language, vol. 3. Doubleday, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lott, D.F., Sommer, R.: Seating arrangements and status. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 7(1, Pt.1), 90–95 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dion, K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E.: What is beautiful is good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 24(3), 285–290 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ivonin, L., Chang, H.-M., Diaz, M., Catala, A., Chen, W., Rauterberg, M.: Traces of unconscious mental processes in introspective reports and physiological responses. PLoS ONE 10(4), e0124519 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    World Health Organization, “Change the definition of blindness,” Disponível no endereço eletrônico, 2008. http://www.who.int/blindness/ChangetheDefinitionofBlindness.pdf Accessed: 27-Dec-2017
  54. 54.
    Rosengren, K. E.: Advances in Scandinavia content analysis: an introduction. Adv. Content Anal. 9–19 (1981)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nandy, B.R., Sarvela, P.D.: Content analysis reexamined: a relevant research method for health education. Am. J. Health Behav. 21(3), 222–234 (1997)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    An, P., Bakker, S., Eggen, B.: Understanding teachers’ routines to inform classroom technology design. Educ. Inf. Technol. 22(4), 1347–1376 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bakker, S., van den Hoven, E., Eggen, B.: Knowing by ear: leveraging human attention abilities in interaction design. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 5(3–4), 197–209 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Darwin, C., Prodger, P.: The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Argyle, M.: The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour. Penguin, London (1994)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Théoret, H., Merabet, L., Pascual-Leone, A.: Behavioral and neuroplastic changes in the blind: evidence for functionally relevant cross-modal interactions. J. Physiol. Paris 98(1), 221–233 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ivanchenko, V., Coughlan, J., Shen, H.: Crosswatch: a camera phone system for orienting visually impaired pedestrians at traffic intersections. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), pp. 1122–1128. LNCS, 5015 (2008)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dunai, L., Fajarnes, G. P., Praderas, V. S., Garcia, B. D., Lengua, I. L.: Real-time assistance prototype—a new navigation aid for blind people. In: IECON 2010-36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1173–1178. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ashmead, D.H., Hill, E.W., Talor, C.R.: Obstacle perception by congenitally blind children. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 46(5), 425–433 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ahmed, T., Hoyle, R., Connelly, K., Crandall, D., Kapadia, A.: Privacy concerns and behaviors of people with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3523–3532. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gruebler, A., Suzuki, K.: Design of a wearable device for reading positive expressions from facial emg signals. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5(3), 227–237 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Qiu, S., Rauterberg, M., Hu, J.: Designing and evaluating a wearable device for accessing gaze signals from the sighted. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9737, 454–464 (2016)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Qiu, S., Anas, S. A., Osawa, H., Rauterberg, M., Hu, J.: E-gaze glasses: simulating natural gazes for blind people. In: Proceedings of the TEI’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 563–569. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bond, M.H., Goodman, G.N.: Gaze patterns and interaction contexts: effects on personality impressions and attributions. Psychol. Int. J. Psychol., Orient (1980)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Argyle, M., Henderson, M., Bond, M., Iizuka, Y., Contarello, A.: Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules. Int. J. Psychol. 21(1–4), 287–315 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Senju, A., Vernetti, A., Kikuchi, Y., Akechi, H., Hasegawa, T., Johnson, M.H.: Cultural background modulates how we look at other persons’ gaze. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 37(2), 131–136 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Utsumi, A., Kawato, S., Abe, S.: Attention monitoring based on temporal signal-behavior structures. In: International Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 100–109. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Murphy-Chutorian, E., Trivedi, M.M.: Head pose estimation in computer vision: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31(4), 607–626 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ruffieux, S., Ruffieux, N., Caldara, R., Lalanne, D.: iKnowU–exploring the potential of multimodal ar smart glasses for the decoding and rehabilitation of face processing in clinical populations. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 423–432. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sandnes, F. E.: What do low-vision users really want from smart glasses? Faces, text and perhaps no glasses at all. In: International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, pp. 187–194. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sandnes, F. E., Eika, E.: Head-mounted augmented reality displays on the cheap: a DIY approach to sketching and prototyping low-vision assistive technologies. In: International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 167–186. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shi Qiu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pengcheng An
    • 2
  • Jun Hu
    • 2
  • Ting Han
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthias Rauterberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Design, School of DesignShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Industrial DesignEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations