Enhancing accessibility in cultural heritage environments: considerations for social computing

  • Panagiotis KosmasEmail author
  • George Galanakis
  • Vaso Constantinou
  • Giannis Drossis
  • Maria Christofi
  • Iosif Klironomos
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
  • Margherita Antona
  • Constantine Stephanidis


Current technological advancements offer many ways of enhancing disabled peoples’ access to cultural heritage environments. A new generation of social computing technologies and systems is changing the way in which we access cultural heritage, facilitating the inclusion of socially isolated groups of people. Under this perspective, this paper aims to explore the potential impact of social computing systems to enhance peoples’ access to cultural heritage, particularly focusing on deaf and disabled users. By reviewing the current literature on social computing and cultural heritage, the paper first summarizes the related applications and appropriate key technologies; second, it provides examples of innovative approaches to the enhancement of user engagement and interaction through social computing. Moreover, the paper highlights arising issues of privacy, as well as ethical considerations, and presents design principles for ensuring privacy. The study concludes by discussing challenges for inclusive social computing applications in the context of cultural heritage and pointing out areas where future research is needed.


Social computing Cultural heritage Disability Accessibility Social interaction Information modeling Deaf Privacy 



Part of the work in the context of this paper has been the result of PhD student exchanges between CUT and FORTH-ICS, funded in the context of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme through NOTRE project (H2020-TWINN-2015, Grant Agreement Number: 692058).


  1. 1.
    Wang, F.Y., Carley, K.M., Zeng, D., Mao, W.: Social computing: from social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(2), 79–83 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manovich, L.: Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data. Debates Digit. Humanit. 2, 460–475 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silberman, N.: Beyond theme parks and digitized data: what can cultural heritage technologies contribute to the public understanding of the past. Paper presented at VAST 2004: 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage. 7–10 November, Brussels and Oudenaarde, Belgium (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coenen, T., Mostmans, L., Naessens, K.: MuseUs: case study of a pervasive cultural heritage serious game. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 6(2), 8 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, E.F., McLoughlin, L., Liarokapis, F., Peters, C., Petridis, P., De Freitas, S.: Developing serious games for cultural heritage: a state-of-the-art review. Virtual Real. 14(4), 255–275 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ott, M., Pozzi, F.: Towards a new era for Cultural Heritage Education: discussing the role of ICT. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(4), 1365–1371 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T., Petrelli, D.: Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(1–2), 73–99 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giaccardi, E. (ed.): Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. Routledge, London (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas, J.: Archeology and Modernity. Routledge, London (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lowenthal, D.: Stewarding the future. CRM J. Herit. Steward. 2(2), 6–25 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simon, N.: The Participatory Museum. Museum 2.0, Santa Cruz (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molla, A., Al-Jaghoub, S.: Evaluating digital inclusion projects: a livelihood approach. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 3(6), 592–611 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doulamis, N., Doulamis, A., Ioannidis, C., Klein, M., Ioannides, M.: Modelling of static and moving objects: digitizing tangible and intangible cultural heritage. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Papagiannakis, G (eds.) Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage, pp. 567–589. Springer International Publishing (2017).
  14. 14.
    Doerr, M., Ore, C.E., Stead, S.: The CIDOC conceptual reference model: a new standard for knowledge sharing. In: Tutorials, Posters, Panels and Industrial Contributions at the 26th International Conference on Conceptual modeling, vol. 83, pp. 51–56. Australian Computer Society, Inc (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doulaverakis, C., Kompatsiaris, Y., Strintzis, M.G.: Ontology-based access to multimedia cultural heritage collections—the REACH project. In: The International Conference on Computer as a Tool, 2005. EUROCON 2005, Vol. 1, pp. 151–154. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amato, F., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., Colace, F., Santo, M.D., Schreiber, F.A., Tanca, L.: Big data meets digital cultural heritage: design and implementation of scrabs, a smart context-aware browsing assistant for cultural environments. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 10(1), 6 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C., Van de Sompel, H.: The Europeana data model (edm). In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, pp. 10–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G.: Storytelling: its role in information visualization. In: European Systems Science Congress, vol. 5 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zünd, F., Ryffel, M., Magnenat, S., Marra, A., Nitti, M., Kapadia, M., Sumner, R.W.: Augmented creativity: bridging the real and virtual worlds to enhance creative play. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications, p. 21. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foni, A.E., Papagiannakis, G., Magnenat-Thalmann, N.: A taxonomy of visualization strategies for cultural heritage applications. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 3(1), 1 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bujari, A., Ciman, M., Gaggi, O., Palazzi, C.E.: Using gamification to discover cultural heritage locations from geo-tagged photos. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 21(2), 235–252 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bianchi-Berthouze, N.: Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Hum. Comput. Interact. 28(1), 40–75 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Valk, L., Rijnbout, P., Bekker, T., Eggen, B., De Graaf, M., Schouten, B.: Designing for playful experiences in open-ended intelligent play environments. In: IADIS International Conference Games and Entertainment Technologies, vol. 310 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zabulis, X., Grammenos, D., Sarmis, T., Tzevanidis, K., Padeleris, P., Koutlemanis, P., Argyros, A.A.: Multicamera human detection and tracking supporting natural interaction with large-scale displays. Mach. Vis. Appl. 24(2), 319–336 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kosmas, P., Ioannou, A., Retalis, S.: Using embodied learning technology to advance motor performance of children with special educational needs and motor impairments. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10474. Springer, Cham (2017). Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kosmas, P., Ioannou, A., Retalis, S.: Moving bodies to moving minds: a study of the use of motion-based games in special education. TechTrends 62(6), 594–601 (2018). Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kosmas, P., Ioannou, A., Zaphiris, P.: Implementing embodied learning in the classroom: effects on children’s memory and language skills. Educational Media International 56(1), 59–74 (2018). Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pannier, M., Hornecker, E., Bertel, S.: Can’t touch this—the design case study of a museum installation. Mensch und Computer 2016-Tagungsband (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Drossis, G., Grammenos, D., Birliraki, C., Stephanidis, C.: MAGIC: developing a multimedia gallery supporting mid-air gesture-based interaction and control. In: International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 303–307. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ridel, B., Reuter, P., Laviole, J., Mellado, N., Couture, N., Granier, X.: The Revealing Flashlight: interactive spatial augmented reality for detail exploration of cultural heritage artifacts. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 7(2), 6 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Drossis, G., Birliraki, C., Stephanidis, C.: Interaction with immersive cultural heritage environments using virtual reality technologies. In: International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 177–183. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brignull, H., Rogers, Y.: Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In: Proceedings of INTERACT, vol. 3, pp. 17–24 (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vogel, D., Balakrishnan, R.: Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 137–146. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G., Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A., Saarikko, P.: It’s Mine, Don’t Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1285–1294. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hornecker, E.: “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool”–visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. In: 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, 2008. TABLETOP 2008, pp. 113–120. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Majewski, J., Bunch, L.: The expanding definition of diversity: accessibility and disability culture issues in museum exhibitions. Curator Mus. J. 41(3), 153–160 (1998)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sandell, R.: Museums and the combating of social inequality: roles, responsibilities, resistance. In: Sandell, R. (ed.) Museums, p. 21. Society, Inequality, Routledge, London (2003)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hall, E., Wilton, R.: Alternative spaces of ‘work’ and inclusion for disabled people. Disabil. Soc. 26(7), 867–880 (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    ​Matarasso, F.: Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Comedia, Stroud (1997)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sandell, R.: Social inclusion, the museum and the dynamics of sectorial change. Museum and Society 1(1), 45–62 (2003)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dodd, J.: Service Manager, Nottingham City Museums and Art Galleries. Personal communication (2000)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goodall, B., Pottinger, G., Dixon, T.I.M., Russell, H.: Access to historic environments for tourists with disabilities: a compromise? Tourism Rev. Int. 8(3), 177–194 (2005)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    McMillen, R.: Museum disability access: social inclusion opportunities through innovative new media practices. Pac J 10, 95–107 (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Evens, T., Hauttekeete, L.: Challenges of digital preservation for cultural heritage institutions. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 43(3), 157–165 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bowen, J.P.: Web access to cultural heritage for the disabled. arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/0307068 (2003)
  46. 46.
    Micheloni, G., Bowen, J.P.: Accessibility and usability survey on UK and international art gallery and museum Websites. In: Making Museum Websites Accessible (MCN 2002) Workshop, Retrieved on November, vol. 10, p. 2006 (2002)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lisney, E., Bowen, J.P., Hearn, K., Zedda, M.: Museums and technology: being inclusive helps accessibility for all. Curator Mus. J. 56(3), 353–361 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Christofi, M., Kyrlitsias, C., Michael-Grigoriou, D., Anastasiadou, Z., Michaelidou, M., Papamichael, I., Pieri, K.: A tour in the archaeological site of choirokoitia using virtual reality: a learning performance and interest generation assessment. In: Ioannides M., Martins J., Žarnić R., Lim V. (eds.) Advances in Digital Cultural Heritage. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10754. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pappa, G., Ioannou, N., Christofi, M., Lanitis, A.: Preparing student mobility through a VR application for cultural education. In: Advances in Digital Cultural Heritage, pp. 218–227. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kawashima, N.: Audience development and social inclusion in Britain: tensions, contradictions and paradoxes in policy and their implications for cultural management. International Journal of Cultural Policy 12(1), 55–72 (2006)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Van Gurp, S.: Self-concept of secondary school students in different educational settings. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 6, 55–69 (2001)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Martins, P.R.: Engaging the d/deaf audience in museums: a case study at the Calouste Gulbenkian Museum. J. Mus. Educ. 41(3), 202–209 (2016)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Constantinou, V., Loizides, F., Ioannou, A.: A personal tour of cultural heritage for deaf museum visitors. In: Ioannides, M., et al. (eds.) Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10059. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Paternò, F., Santoro, C.: Exploiting mobile devices to support museum visits through multimodal interfaces and multi-device games. Web Inf. Syst. Technol. 1, 459–465 (2007)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Proctor, N.: Providing deaf and hard-of-hearing visitors with on-demand, independent access to museum information and interpretation through handheld computers. Museums and the Web 2005 Papers (2005). Accessed 11 June 2017
  56. 56.
    Alexandri, E., Tzanavara, A.: New technologies in the service of museum education. World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ. 12(2), 317–320 (2014)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brice, P.J., Straus, G.: Deaf adolescents in a hearing world: a review of factors affecting psychosocial adaptation. Adolesc. Health Med. Ther. 7, 67–76 (2017)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Othman, M.K., Petrie, H., Power, C.: Measuring the usability of a smartphone delivered museum guide. Soc. Behav. Sci. 97, 629–637 (2013)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Aoki, P.M., Woodruff, A.: Improving electronic guidebooks interfaces using a task-oriented design approach. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schilit, B.N., Adam, N., Want, R.: Context-aware mobile application. In: Proceeding IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. Santa Cruz (1994)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cho, H., Jolley, A.: Museum education for children with disabilities: development of the nature senses traveling trunk. J. Mus. Educ. 41(3), 220–229 (2016)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Meyer, S., Larrivee, L., Veneziano-Korzec, A., Stacy, K.: Improving art museum accessibility for adults with acquired hearing loss. Am. J. Audiol. 26, 10–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lurio, A.: Engaging children with autism at historic sites: developing an audience-appropriate curriculum. J. Mus. Educ. 41(3), 165–173 (2016)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sandell, R.: Museums as agents of social inclusion. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 17(4), 401–418 (1998)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rossetti, V., Furfari, F., Leporini, B., Pelagatti, S., Quarta, A.: Enabling access to cultural heritage for the visually impaired: an interactive 3D model of a cultural site. Comput. Sci. 130, 383–391 (2018)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    van Rest, J., Boonstra, D., Everts, M., van Rijn, M., van Paassen, R.: Designing privacy-by-design. In: Preneel, B., Ikonomou, D. (eds.) Privacy Technologies and Policy. APF 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8319, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    DeCew, J.W.: In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1997)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Himma, K.E., Tavani, H. (eds.): The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Wiley, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tavani, H.T.: Ethics and Technology: Controversies, Questions, and Strategies for Ethical Computing. Wiley, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L. J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L.: Imagenet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009, pp. 248–255. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 88(2), 303–338 (2010)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lauronen, M.: Ethical Issues in Topical Computer Vision Applications. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä (2017)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zou, J., Schiebinger, L.: AI can be sexist and racist—it’s time to make it fair. Nature 559(7714), 324–326 (2018). Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Brey, P.: Virtual reality and computer simulation. In: Himma, K.E., Tavani, H.T. (eds.) The handbook of information and computer ethics, pp. 361-384. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2008)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wiener, N.: The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Houghton Mifflin, Oxford (1950)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Friedman, B. (ed.): Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, vol. 72. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design: theory and methods. University of Washington technical report (2002): 02-12Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Borning, A., Muller, M.: Next steps for value sensitive design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jacobs, N., Huldtgren, A.: Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments. Eth Info Technol 1, 1–4 (2018)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Robeyns, I.: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-examined. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge (2018)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Cavoukian, A.: Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles Implementation and Mapping of Fair Information Practices. Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada Standards (2010)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    ENISA: Privacy by design in big data: an overview of privacy enhancing technologies in the era of big data analytics. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (2015). Accessed 15 June 2017
  83. 83.
    EDPS: Preliminary Opinion on privacy by design, European Data Protection Supervisor (2018). Accessed 15 June 2017
  84. 84.
    Alshammari, M., Simpson, A.: Towards a principled approach for engineering privacy by design. In: Schweighofer, E., Leitold, H., Mitrakas, A., Rannenberg, K. (eds.) Privacy Technologies and Policy. APF 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10518, Springer, Cham (2017)  Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    European Parliament: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Off. J. Eur. Union L119, 1–88 (2016). Accessed 21 June 2017
  86. 86.
    ENISA: Handbook on Security of Personal Data Processing. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (2017). Accessed 28 June 2017

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis Kosmas
    • 1
    Email author
  • George Galanakis
    • 2
  • Vaso Constantinou
    • 1
  • Giannis Drossis
    • 2
  • Maria Christofi
    • 1
  • Iosif Klironomos
    • 2
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
    • 1
  • Margherita Antona
    • 2
  • Constantine Stephanidis
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Cyprus Interaction LabCyprus University of Technology (CUT)LimassolCyprus
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceFoundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH)HeraklionGreece
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece

Personalised recommendations