Accessibility of tourism websites: the level of countries’ commitment

  • Trinidad Domínguez VilaEmail author
  • Elisa Alén González
  • Simon Darcy
Long Paper


Various initiatives have been undertaken in recent years to improve the accessibility of tourism in a large number of countries. One of the areas in which work has been done has been the inclusion and accessibility of information for all, especially for people with disabilities and other users with access needs. A focus of this work has been to the digital world, given the increasing relevance of the internet in daily life. This paper aims to determine whether the different nation states are applying appropriate standards, both under their own regulations and under those from United Nations agreements regarding accessibility to online tourism information to foster more sustainable tourism. In the study of official tourism organization website home pages of the countries contained in the World Tourism Organization reports, cluster analysis was used to identify common behaviour patterns. The main result was the need to improve the compatibility and ease of navigation of websites, as well as identifying Japan, Hong Kong and South Korea as countries that can serve as examples of good practice.


Accessible Disability Official tourism websites Social sustainability WCAG 2.0 



  1. 1.
    Akgül, Y., Vatansever, K.: Web accessibility evaluation of government websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. J. Advert. Manag. Sci. 4(3), 201–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amadeus: Voyage of discovery: working towards inclusive and accessible travel for all. (2017). Web design update 10 July 2017
  3. 3.
    Bastida, U., Huan, T.: Performance evaluation of tourism websites’ information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei. J. Bus. Res. 67(2), 167–170 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benckendorff, P.J., Sheldon, P.J., Fesenmaier, D.R.: Tourism Information Technology. CABI, USA (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bickenbach, J.E.: Disability human rights, law and policy. In: Alberecht, G., Seelman, K., Bury, M. (eds.) Handbook of Disability Studies, pp. 565–584. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bizjak, B., Knezvevic, M., Cvetrezvnik, S.: Attitude change towards guests with disabilities. Ann. Tour. Res. 38(3), 842–857 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buhalis, D., Michopoulou, E.: Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: addressing the accessibility market. Curr. Issues Tour. 14(2), 145–168 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buhalis, D.: Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tour. Manag. 21(1), 97–116 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burnett, J.J., Baker, H.: Assessing the travel-related behaviours of the mobility-disabled consumer. J. Travel Res. 40(1), 4–11 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniels, M.J., Rodgers, E.B., Wiggins, P.B.: Travel tales: an interpretive analysis of constraints and negotiations to pleasure travel as experienced by persons with physical disabilities. Tour. Manag. 26, 919–930 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darcy, S.: Inherent complexity: disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences. Tour. Manag. 31(6), 816–826 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darcy, S., Cameron, B., Pegg, S.: Accessible tourism and sustainability: a decisión and case study. J. Sustain. Tour. 18(4), 515–537 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Darcy, S., Dickson, T.: A whole-of-life approach to tourism: the case for accessible tourism experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 16(1), 32–44 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dolnicar, S., Leisch, F.: Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap. Mark. Lett. 21, 83–101 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Domínguez, T.: Marketing turístico para personas con discapacidad. El producto turístico accesible. PhD of the University of Vigo, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Domínguez, T., Fraiz, J.A.: Un nuevo desafío: el contenido y la accesibilidad al contenido de las web turísticas españolas. Revista Gallega de Economía 18(1), 1–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Domínguez, T., Alen, E., Darcy, S.: Website accessibility in the tourism industry: an analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world. Disabil. Rehabil. (2017). Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Domínguez, T., Fraiz, J.A., Alen, E.: Economic profitability of accessible tourism for the tourism sector in Spain. Tour. Econ. 19(6), 1385–1399 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dwyer, L., Darcy, S.: Economic contribution of tourists with disabilities: an Australian approach and methodology. In: Buhalis, D., Darcy (eds.) Accessible Tourism: Concept and Issues, pp. 213–239. Channel View Publications, Bristol (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eichhorn, V., Miller, G., Michopoulou, E., Buhalis, D.: Enabling access to tourism through information schemes. Ann. Tour. Res. 35(1), 189–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eichhorn, V., Miller, G., Tribe, J.: Tourism: a site of resistance strategies of individuals with a disability. Ann. Tour. Res. 43, 578–600 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Enamorado, S.: Countries that have adopted WCAG standards. (2017). Web design update 24 Aug 2017
  23. 23.
    European Commission: Accesibilidad a Turistas con Discapacidad. Manual para la industria del turismo, DG XIII, Unidad Turismo. EC, Spain (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eurostat: Tourism in the enlarged European Union. Catalogue No KS-NP-05-013-EN-N. European Commission, Brussels (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fuguet, T.: Europa demanda más accesibilidad. Editur 07, 10–15 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Freeman, I., Selmi, N.: French versus Canadian tourism: response to the disabled. J. Travel Res. 49(4), 471–485 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Global Sustainable Tourism Council-GSTC: World Charter for Sustainable Tourism + 20, 27 November 2015. Basque Country, Spain (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Inal, Y., Rızvanoğlu, K., Yesilada, Y.: Web accessibility in Turkey: awareness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. (2017). Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ip, C., Law, R., Lee, H.A.: A review of website evaluation studies in the tourism and hospitality fields from 1996 to 2009. Int. J. Tour. Res. 13(3), 234–265 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuzma, J., Weisenborn, G., Philippe, T., Gabel, A., Dolechek, R.: Analysis of US senate web sites for disability accessibility. Int. J. Bus. Res. 9(6), 174–181 (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Law, R., Qi, S., Buhalis, D.: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tour. Manag. 31(3), 297–313 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee, W., Gretzel, U.: Designing persuasive destination websites: a mental imagery processing perspective. Tour. Manag. 33(5), 1270–1280 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li, X., Wang, Y.: Measuring the effectiveness of us official state tourism websites. J. Vacat. Mark. 17(4), 287–302 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Linde, F., Stock, W.G.: Information Markets. A Strategic Guideline for the I-Commerce. De Gruyter Saur, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McKercher, B., Packer, T., Yau, M.K., Lam, P.: Travel agents as facilitators or inhibitors of travel: perceptions of people with disabilities. Tour. Manag. 24(4), 465–474 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Michopoulou, E., Darcy, S., Ambrose, I., Buhalis, D.: Accessible tourism futures: the world we dream to live in and the opportunities we hope to have. J. Tour. Futures 1(3), 179–188 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mitsche, N.: Understanding the information search process within a tourism domain specific search engine. In: Frew, A.J. (ed.) Information and communication technologies in tourism, pp. 183–193. Springer, Vienna (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mkono, M., Tribe, J.: Beyond reviewing: uncovering the multiple roles of tourism social media users. J. Travel Res. 56(3), 287–298 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nakawaga, J., Blanck, P.: Future of disability law in Japan: employment and accommodation. Loyola Los Angeles Int. Law Rev. Comp. 9(1-2010), 173–221 (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nyaupane, G.P., Andereck, K.L.: Understanding travel constraints: application and extension of a leisure constraints model. J. Travel Res. 46(4), 433–439 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pagan, R.: The contribution of holiday trips to life satisfaction: the case of people with disabilities. Curr. Issues Tour. 18(6), 524–538 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ray, M.M., Ryder, M.E.: Ebilities tourism: an exploratory discussion of the travel needs and motivations of the mobility-disabled. Tour. Manag. 24, 57–72 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Richards, V., Pritchard, A., Morgan, N.: Re)Envisoning tourism and visual impairment. Ann. Tour. Res. 37(4), 1097–1116 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rimmerman, A.: Israel’s equal rights for persons with disabilities law: current status and future directions. Disabil. Stud. Q. 25(4), 38 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shi, Y.: The accessibility of Queensland visitor information centers’ website. Tour. Manag. 27, 829–841 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Slatin, J., Rush, S.: Maximum Accessibility. Addison-Wesley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tang, L., Jang, S.: Investigating the routes of communication on destination websites. J. Travel Res. 51(1), 94–108 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    UN: Status of the convention of the rights of persons with disabilities and the optional protocol thereto. Genral Assembly A/69/284, published 7 August 2014 (2018)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    United Nations-UN: 70/193. International year of sustainable tourism for development, 2017. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 22 December 2015, published 9 February 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    UN: 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, published 21 October 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    UN: A/CONF.216/L.1*. Rio + 20: The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, 20 to 22 of June 2012, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2012)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    UN: A/61/106. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 13 December 2006 (2007)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    VanHorn, L.: The United States: travellerswith disabilities. In: Buhalis, D., Darcy, S., Ambrose, I. (eds.) Best Practice in Accessible Tourism: Inclusion, Disability, Ageing Population and Tourism, pp. 65–78. Channel View Publications, Bristol (2011)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vázquez, F.: El análisis de contenido temático. Objetivos y medios en la investigación psicosocial. Documento de trabajo, pp. 47–70. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (1996)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vigo, M., Brajnik, G., Abascal, J.: Tool independence for the web accessibility quantitative metric. Disabil. Rehabil. 4(4), 248–263 (2009)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vigo, M., Brown, J., Conway, V.: Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In: W4A ‘13 Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 13–15, 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wöber, K.: Domain specific search engines. In: Fesenmaier, D.R., Wöber, K., Werthner, H. (eds.) Destination recommendation systems: behavioural foundations and applications, pp. 205–226. CAB International, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    World Health Organization-WHO: A66/12. Disability. Report by the Secretariat. Published 11 March 2012, including EB132/10 (2012)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    World Health Organization and the World Bank: World Report on Disability. WHO, Geneva (2011)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    World Tourism Organization-UNWTO: 2017 is the International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development. UNWTO, Madrid (2016)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    UNWTO: Tourism Highlights 2015 Edition. UNWTO, Madrid (2016)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    World Wide Web Consortium-W3C: Web accessibility evaluation tools list. (2016). Accessed Mar 2016
  63. 63.
    W3C: World Wide Web Consortium Process Document. (2015). Accessed 14 Oct 2005
  64. 64.
    W3C: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. (2015). Accessed 10 July 2014
  65. 65.
    W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. W3C Recommendation. (2008). Accessed 11 Dec 2008
  66. 66.
    W3C: World Wide Web Consortium Process Document. (2005). Accessed 14 Oct 2005
  67. 67.
    Xiang, Z., Gretzel, U.: Role of social media in online travel information search. Tour. Manag. 31(2), 179–188 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xiang, Z., Gretzel, U., Fesenmaier, D.R.: Semantic representation of the online tourism domain. J. Travel Res. 47(4), 440–453 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yuan, Y.L., Ho, C.I.: Rethinking the destination marketing organization management in the big data era. In: Proceedings of the ASE Big Data and Social Informatics, p. 60 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trinidad Domínguez Vila
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elisa Alén González
    • 1
  • Simon Darcy
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Business Sciences and TourismUniversity of VigoOurenseSpain
  2. 2.UTS Business School, University of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations