Advertisement

The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults

  • Hacer GunerEmail author
  • Cengiz Acarturk
Long Paper
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

To become an information society, it is required that the citizens have access to information and communication technologies (ICT) in appropriate ways. ICT plays a major role to improve inclusion of various parts of the society (such as children, disabled citizens, and elderly) into daily life. According to reports of WHO, the world population is getting older. This urges the need for a systematic investigation of ICT needs of elderly citizens and potential problems being faced during the course of interaction with ICT interfaces. The present study focuses on the use and acceptance of ICT by elderly citizens in comparison to younger adults by providing data from citizens living in Turkey. It reports data collected from 232 elderly participants (60–96 years old) and 235 younger adults (19–40 years old). The findings of the study show that, both elderly and younger adults confirm the technology acceptance model (TAM) in a similar way. This was accompanied by elderly citizens’ need for assistance, encouragement and friendlier interface designs. The present study aims to contribute towards increasing awareness about the needs and expectations of elderly citizens and inspire further research on ICT use of the elderly population.

Keywords

Senior citizens Technology acceptance model (TAM) Acceptance of ICT Elderly population Accessibility Structural equation modeling (SEM) 

Notes

Supplementary material

10209_2018_642_MOESM1_ESM.docx (43 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 43 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Abdullah, F., Ward, R.: Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56 (2016), 238–256 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdullah, F., Ward, R., Ahmed, E.: Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 75–90 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agudo-Peregrina, A.F., Hernández-García, A., Pascual-Miguel, P.J.: Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34, 301–314 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 50(2), 179–211 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Gahtani, S.S.: Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: a structural equation model. Appl. Comput. Inform. 12(1), 27–50 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagozzi, R.P.: The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 8(4), 244–254 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benbasat, I., Barki, H.: Quo vadis TAM? J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 8(4), 211–218 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braun, M.T.: Obstacles to social networking website use among elderly people. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 673–680 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruder, C., Blessing, L., Wandke, H.: Adaptive training interfaces for less-experienced, elderly users of electronic devices. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(1), 4–15 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burton-Jones, A., Hubona, G.S.: The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 706–717 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, M.K., Cheung, W.: Determinants of the intention to use internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study. Inf. Manag. 39(1), 1–14 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan, K., Chen, A.H.S.: Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics 57(5), 635–652 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaumon, M.-E.B., Michel, C., Barnard, F.T., Croisile, B.: Can ICT improve the quality of life of elderly adults living in residential home care units? From actual impacts to hidden artefacts. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(6), 574–590 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung, J.E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., McLaughlin, M.: Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1674–1684 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 21(2), 333–352 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Czaja, S.J., Lee, C.C.: The impact of aging on access to technology. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 5, 341–349 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Qarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dogruel, L., Joeckel, S., Bowman, N.D.: The use and acceptance of new media entertainment technology by elderly users: development of an expanded technology acceptance model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34(11), 1052–1063 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duriau, V.J., Reger, R.K., Pfarrer, M.D.: A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organ. Res. Methods 10, 5–34 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischer, S.H., David, D., Crotty, B.H., Dierks, M., Safran, C.: Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elderly. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83(9), 624–635 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D.: A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(5), 91–109 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D., Boudreau, M.C.: Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4(7), 2–74 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    González, A., Ramírez, M.P., Viadel, V.: Attitudes of the elderly toward information and communications technologies. Educ. Gerontol. 38(9), 585–594 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M., Ringle, C.M.: The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Plan. 45 (2012), 320–340 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanson, V.L.: (2010). Influencing technology adoption by elderly people. Interact. Comput., Volume 22, Issue 6, November 2010, Pages 502–509Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanson, V.L.: Technology skill and age: what will be the same 20 years from now? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(4), 443–452 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hargittai, E., Piper, A.M., Morris, M.R.: (2018). From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Univ. Access Inf. Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.:Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(4), 361–375 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoque, R., Sorwar, G.: Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 101(9), 75–84 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Joo, Y.J., Lim, K.Y., Kim, E.K.: Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Comput. Educ. 57(2), 2011, pp. 1654–1664 (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karahasanovi, A., Brandtzæg, P.B., Heim, J., Luders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., Lievens, B., Vanattenhoven, J., Jans, G.: Co-creation and user-generated content—elderly people. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(3), 655–678 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim, Y.J., Chun, J.U., Song, J.: Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 29(1), 67–77 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.T.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(50), 752–780 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lefever, S., Dal, M., Matthíasdóttir, A.: Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 38(4), 574–582 (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lian, J.W., Yen, D.C.: Online shopping drivers and barriers for elderly people: age and gender differences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37 (2014), 133–143 (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lu, J., Yao, J.E., Yu, C.S.: Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 14(3), 245–268 (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ma, Q., Chan, A.H.S., Chen, K.: Personal and other factors affecting acceptance of smartphone technology by older Chinese adults. Appl. Ergon. 54 (2016), 62–71 (2016)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Macedo, I.M.: Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: an empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 935–948 (2017)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Magsamen-Conrad, K., Upadhyaya, S., Joa, C.Y., Dowd, J.: Bridging the divide: using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50 (2015), 186–196 (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marquié, J.C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., Huet, N.: Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behav. Inf. Technol. 21(4), 273–280 (2002)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    McCloskey, D.W.: The importance of ease of use, usefulness, and trust to online consumers: an examination of the technology acceptance model with older consumers. J. Organ. End User Comput. 18(3), 47–65 (2006)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., et al.: Older adults talk technology: technology use and attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1710–1721 (2010)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mynatt, E.D., Rogers, W.A.: Developing technology to support the functional independence of elderly people. Ageing Int. 27(1), 24–41 (2002)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nayak, L.U.S., Priest, L., White, A.P.: An application of the technology acceptance model to the level of Internet use by elderly people. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9(4), 367–374 (2010)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R.: Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(6), 708–772 (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pan, S., Jordan-Marsh, M.: Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese elderly people: from the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 1111–1119 (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Park, Y.: An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(3), 150–162 (2009)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Park, Y., Son, H., Kim, C.: Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 22, 377–386 (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Park, J., Han, S.H., Kim, H.K., Cho, Y., Park, W.: Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: survey, interview, and observation approaches. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 23(4), 279–293 (2013)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Patsoule, E., Koutsabasis, P.: Redesigning websites for older adults: a case study. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(6), 561–573 (2014)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.M.: Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83(4), 235–248 (2014)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Petrovčič, A., Slavec, A., Dolničar, V.: The ten shades of silver: segmentation of older adults in the mobile phone market. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(9), 845–860 (2018)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Phang, W.C., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B.C.Y., Teo, H.H.: Senior citizens’ acceptance of information systems: a study in the context of e-Government services. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53(4), 555–569 (2006)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Porter, C.E., Donthu, N.: Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet use: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J. Bus. Res. 59(9), 999–1007 (2006)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Preusse, K.C., Mitzner, T.L., Fausset, C.B., Rogers, W.A.: Older adults’ acceptance of activity trackers. J. Appl. Gerontol. 36(2), 127–155 (2017)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Purnomo, S.H., Lee, Y.: E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia: an empirical study. Inf. Dev. 29(2), 138–153 (2013) 2013Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ramón-Jerónimo, M., Peral-Peral, B., Arenas-Gaitán, J.: Elderly persons and internet use. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(4), 389–403 (2013)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., Anolli, L.: The use of the internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 6(1), 73–80 (2003)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Roldán, J., Sánchez-Franco, M.J.: Variance-based structural equation modeling: guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems, Chapter 10, pp. 193–221 (2012)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ryu, M.H., Kim, S., Lee, E.: Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user’s participation in video UCC services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(3), 619–632 (2009)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Smith, D., Reams, R., Hair, J.F.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 5(1), 105–115 (2014)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Streukens, S., Leroi-Werelds, S.: Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: a step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. Eur. Manag. J. 34(6), 2016, Pages 618–632 (2016)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Subasi, O., Leitner, M., Hoeller, N., Geven, A., Tscheligi, M.: Designing accessible experiences for older users: user requirement analysis for a railway ticketing portal. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 391–402 (2011)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S.: Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Pearson, Boston (2013) (2007)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Teo, T.: Modelling technology acceptance in education: a study of pre-service teachers. Comput. Educ. 52(2), 2009, pp. 302–312 (2009)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    TurkStat: Elderly statistics 2016. Turkish Statistics Institute, March 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vassli, L.T., Farshchian, B.A.: Acceptance of health-related ICT among elderly people living in the community: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(2), 99–116 (2018)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 342–365 (2000)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci., 39, pp. 273–315Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 328–376 (2016) No. 5 (2016Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vijayasarathy, L.R.: Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 41(6), 2004, pp. 747–762 (2004)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wang, L., Rau, P.L.P., Salvendy, G.: Older adults’ acceptance of information technology. Educ. Gerontol. 37(12), 1081–1099 (2011)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    World Bank.: Population ages 65 and above. DataBank: World development indicators retrieved from September 8, 2017 (2017). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?contextual=default&end=2016&start=2000&year_high_desc=true
  79. 79.
    World Health Organization: World report on ageing and health. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, Luxemburg (2015)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Yang, H., Yoo, Y.: It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis. Support Syst. 38(1), 2004, pp. 19–31 (2004)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J.G.: Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 2. J. Model. Manag. 2(3), 281–304 (2007)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.-L.P., Salvendy, G.: Age-related difference in the use of mobile phones. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 13, 401–413 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics InstituteMiddle East Technical UniversityÇankayaTurkey

Personalised recommendations