Advertisement

Technology support for the inclusion of deaf students in mainstream schools: a summary of research from 2007 to 2017

  • Vaso Constantinou
  • Andri Ioannou
  • Iosif Klironomos
  • Margherita Antona
  • Constantine Stephanidis
Communication
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

The paper examines the use of technology as a means for the inclusion of Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) students in mainstream K-12 schools, covering the publications of the last decade. A systematic search of databases was carried out to locate theoretical and empirical studies investigating technologies as auxiliary or supporting tools for the inclusion of DHH students. Results are presented in two categories: (1) review/survey or theoretical papers and (2) studies of technology design and evaluation. Based on our findings, there is only preliminary evidence on how technology can support the inclusion of DHH students in mainstream schools. We argue that there is less need for research on technologies specialized on the disability, aiming to accommodate hearing loss, such as technologies to support the acquisition of sign language or speech-to-text translation of the teacher’s talk. There is a major need for technology integration and research on its real-world use and utility, towards the inclusion of all students in the mainstream classroom, serving the needs of both DHH students and the general student population.

Keywords

Deaf Hard of hearing Hearing impaired Mainstream education Inclusion Technology-enhanced learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme through NOTRE project. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 692058.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Nafjan, A., Al-Arifi, B., Al-Wabil, A.: Design and development of an educational Arabic sign language mobile application: collective impact with Tawasol. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Universal access in human-computer interaction, vol. 9176, pp. 319–326. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3_30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Archbold, S., Mayer, C.: Deaf education: the impact of cochlear implantation? Deaf. Educ. Int. 14(1), 2–15 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barton, L., Armstrong, F. (eds.): Policy, Experience and Change: Cross-cultural Reflections on Inclusive Education, vol. 4. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batten, G., Oakes, P.M., Alexander, T.: Factors associated with social interactions between deaf children and their hearing peers: a systematic literature review. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 19(3), 285–302 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beal-Alvarez, J., Cannon, J.E.: Technology intervention research with deaf and hard of hearing learners: levels of evidence. Am. Ann. Deaf. 158(5), 486–505 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2014.0002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burgstahler, S.: (2015). Opening doors or slamming them shut? Online learning practices and students with disabilities. Soc. Incl. 3(6).  https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i6.420
  7. 7.
    Chuan, C.H., Guardino, C.A.: Designing SMARTSIGNPLAY: an interactive and intelligent american sign language app for children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their families. In: Companion publication of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp. 45–48. ACM, New York (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2876456.2879483
  8. 8.
    De Raeve, L.: Education and rehabilitation of deaf children with cochlear implants: a multidisciplinary task. Cochlear Implants Int. 11(suppl 1), 7–14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Ibrahim, Z., Shing, N.K., Rashid, S.M.M.: Design of a learning module for the deaf in a higher education institution using padlet. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 220–226 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ditcharoen, N., Naruedomkul, K., Cercone, N.: SignMT: an alternative language learning tool. Comput. Educ. 55(1), 118–130 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drigas, A.S., Papanastasiou, G.: (2014). Interactive white boards’ added value in special education. Int. J. Online Eng. 10(6).  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v10i6.4004
  12. 12.
    Fitzgerald, T.: The educational needs of deaf and hearing impaired children. Specialist Education Services, Wellington (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halawani, S.M.: Arabic sign language translation system on mobile devices. IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 8(1), 251–256 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hashim, H., Tasir, Z., Mohamad, S.K.: (2013). E-learning environment for hearing impaired students. TOJET: Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 12(4):67–70Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Human Rights—WFD. WFD. (2016) https://wfdeaf.org/human-rights/. Retrieved 22 April 2017
  16. 16.
    Hyde, M., Punch, R., Power, D., Hartley, J., Neale, J., Brennan, L.: The experiences of deaf and hard of hearing students at a Queensland University: 1985–2005. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. 28(1), 85–98 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iglesias, A., Ruiz-Mezcua, B., López, J.F., Figueroa, D.C.: New communication technologies for inclusive education in and outside the classroom. In: Assistive technologies: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global (2013).  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2530-3.ch013
  18. 18.
    Kelman, C.A., Branco, A.U.: (Meta) Communication strategies in inclusive classes for deaf students. Am. Ann. Deaf 154(4), 371–381 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lederberg, A.R., Schick, B., Spencer, P.E.: Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: successes and challenges. Dev. Psychol. 49(1), 15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lidström, H., Hemmingsson, H.: Benefits of the use of ICT in school activities by students with motor, speech, visual, and hearing impairment: a literature review. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 21(4), 251–266 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2014.880940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lipsky, D.K., Gartner, A.: Inclusion and school reform: transforming America’s classrooms. Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Magon, D.P.D.S., Campello, A.R.E.S., Castro, H.C.: WhatSurdo: a strategy to simulate the real communicational world in low income schools. Sch. Int. J. Multidiscip. Allied Stud. 3(4), 76–82 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.19085/journal.sijmas030401 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nathan, S.S., Hashim, N.L., Hussain, A.: Usability evaluation of mobile application: a review on usability model for the deaf. J. Teknol. 78(4–3), 127–131 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parton, B.: Facilitating exposure to sign languages of the world: the case for mobile assisted language learning. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract. 13:13–24 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Portugal, C., de Souza Couto, R.M.: Designing a learning game for the deaf children as an educational technology. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 3(1):60–75 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., Chen, N.S., Yueh-Min, H.: Review of speech-to-text recognition technology for enhancing learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 65 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shepherd, C.M., Alpert, M.: Using technology to provide differentiated instruction for deaf learners. J.Instr. Pedag. 16, 1 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spaulding, L.S., Pratt, S.M.: A review and analysis of the history of special education and disability advocacy in the United States. Am. Educ. Hist. J. 42(1/2), 91 (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toro, J.A., McDonald, J.C., Wolfe, R.: Fostering better deaf/hearing communication through a novel mobile app for fingerspelling. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) Computers helping people with special needs. ICCHP 2014, vol. 8548, pp. 559–564. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08599-9_82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Traynor, N., Harrington, F.: BSL/English interpreting in higher education: is access to the curriculum a reality for deaf students? In: Galloway, C., Young, A. (eds.) Deafness and education in the UK: Research perspectives, pp. 205–239. Whurr, Chichester, England (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    UNESCO: Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All. UNESCO, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vermeulen, A.M., Van Bon, W., Schreuder, R., Knoors, H., Snik, A.: Reading comprehension of deaf children with cochlear implants. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 12(3), 283–302 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zafrulla, Z., Brashear, H., Yin, P., Presti, P., Starner, T., Hamilton, H.: American sign language phrase verification in an educational game for deaf children. In: 2010 20th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), pp. 3846–3849. IEEE (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2010.937

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cyprus Interaction Lab, Department of Multimedia and Graphic ArtsCyprus University of TechnologyLemesosCyprus
  2. 2.Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer ScienceHeraklionGreece
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece

Personalised recommendations