Advertisement

Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 621–633 | Cite as

Internet use among older Europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data

  • Ronny König
  • Alexander Seifert
  • Michael Doh
Long Paper

Abstract

Access to the Internet is becoming increasingly important for all generations. However, a digital gap in Internet use remains between younger and older individuals as well as within the elderly population itself. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate Internet use among elderly Europeans. Representative data across 17 countries from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) were examined. Analyses were based on the responses of 61,202 Europeans aged ≥ 50. Results highlight that, on average, 49% of all respondents use the Internet. However, the situation varies widely among European countries. Alongside individual indicators, such as age, gender, and social class, results indicate that previous experience with computers during one’s time in the workplace is positively associated with Internet use in old age. Furthermore, use of the Internet among an individual’s social network positively influences their use. Wider contextual structures such as area of residence and country-specific wealth and communication technology infrastructure also tend to promote Internet use among elderly Europeans. Data from SHARE indicate that private Internet use among older Europeans is driven by personal resources, prior experiences with technology, social salience as well as contextual influences.

Keywords

ICT Elderly people Europe Digital divide SHARE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper uses data from SHARE Wave 6 ( https://doi.org/10.6103/share.w6.600), see Börsch-Supan et al. [43, 44] for methodological details. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N°211909, SHARE-LEAP: N°227822, SHARE M4: N°261982). Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education and Research, the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, the US National Institute on Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064, HHSN271201300071C), and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org). The data were adjusted for this investigation, and extensive consistency checks were made.

Ethical approval

The research has been conducted according to ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Hepp, A., Krotz, F.: Mediatized worlds: culture and society in a media age. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Compaine, B.M.: The digital divide: facing a crisis or creating a myth?. MIT, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korupp, S.E., Szydlik, M.: Causes and trends of the digital divide. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 21, 409–422 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., et al.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 21(2), 333–352 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lengsfeld, J.H.B.: An econometric analysis of the sociodemographic topology of the digital divide in Europe. Inf. Soc. 27, 141–157 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandtzæg, P.B., Heim, J., Karahasanović, A.: Understanding the new digital divide—a typology of internet users in Europe. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 69, 123–138 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olson, K.E., O’Brien, M.A., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N.: Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing Int 36, 123–145 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seifert, A., Schelling, H.R.: Mobile use of the internet using smartphones or tablets by Swiss people over 65 years. Gerontechnology 14, 57–62 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2015.14.1.006.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doh, M., Schmidt, L.I., Herbolsheimer, F., Jokisch, M., Wahl, H.W.: Patterns of modern ICT use among “senior technology experts”: the role of demographic variables, subjective beliefs and attitudes. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Design for aging. Springer, Los Angeles (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eurostat (2017) Individuals—internet use [isoc_ci_ifp_iu]. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_ci_ifp_iu&lang=en. Accessed 16 May 2017
  11. 11.
    Seifert, A., Schelling, H.R.: Studie “Digitale Senioren”: Nutzung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) durch Menschen ab 65 Jahren in der Schweiz im Jahr 2015. Pro Senectute Schweiz, Zürich (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mingo, I., Bracciale, R.: The Matthew effect in the Italian digital context: the progressive marginalisation of the “poor”. Soc. Indic. Res. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1511-2 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laslett, P.: The third age, the fourth age and the future. Ageing Soc. 14, 436–447 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x00001677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawton, M.P.: Environment and other determinants of weil-being in older people. Gerontologist 23, 349–357 (1983).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/23.4.349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spellerberg, A.: Ländliche Räume in der hoch technisierten Dienstleistungsgesellschaft: mittendrin oder außen vor. In: Barlösius, E., Neu, C. (eds.) Peripherisierung—eine neue Form sozialer Ungleichheit?, pp. 25–35. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stenberg, P.L.: Communications and the internet in rural America. Agric Outlook 6, 23–26 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warschauer, M.: Demystifying the digital divide. Sci. Am. 289, 42–47 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    OECD (2017) Internet access (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/ict/internet-access.htm#indicator-chart. Accessed 01 Jul 2017
  19. 19.
    Sackmann, R., Winkler, O.: Technology generations revisited: the internet generation. Gerontechnology 11, 493–503 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2013.11.4.002.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations, p. 551. Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hüsing, T.: Zunehmendes Nord-Süd Gefälle der digitalen Spaltung in der EU: zur Messung von Ungleichheit in der Diffusion von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren 30, 1–5 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Friemel, T.N.: The digital divide has grown old: determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media Soc 18, 313–331 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seifert, A., Doh, M., Wahl, H.-W.: They also do it: internet use by older adults living in residential care facilities. Educ. Gerontol. 9, 451–461 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2017.1326224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ching, C.C.: The legacy of the digital divide: gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum technology use among young adults. Urban Educ. 40, 394–411 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085905276389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Helsper, E.J.: Gendered internet use across generations and life stages. Commun. Res. 37, 352–374 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fernstrom, K., Ktoridou, D., Eteokleous-Grigoriou, N.: Developing digital immigrants’ computer literacy: the case of unemployed women. Campus Wide Inf. Syst. 28, 154–163 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741111145689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norris, P.: Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Communication, society, and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung, Y., Peng, W., Moran, M., Jin, S.A., McLaughlin, M., Cody, M., Jordan-Marsh, M., Albright, J., Silverstein, M.: Low-income minority seniors’ enrollment in a cybercafé: psychological barriers to crossing the digital divide. Educ. Gerontol. 36, 193–212 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270903183313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bonfadelli, H.: The internet and knowledge gaps: a theoretical and empirical investigation. Eur. J. Commun. 17, 65–84 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hargittai, E.: Digital Na(t)ives?: variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociol. Inq. 80, 92–113 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.2009.00317.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: The disability divide in internet access and use. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9, 313–334 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harrison, A.W., Rainer, R.K.: The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. J. Manag, Inf. Syst. 9, 93–111 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1992.11517949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Deursen, A.: Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media Soc. 13, 893–911 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eurostat (2017) GDP per capita in PPS: tec00114. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00114&plugin=1. Accessed 02 Jul 2017
  36. 36.
    Hox, J.J.: Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Quantitative methodology series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A.: Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. Stata Press, College Station (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Snijders, T.A.B., Bosker, R.J.: Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maas, C.J.M., Hox, J.J.: Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodol. J. Res. Methods Behav.m Soc. Sci. 1, 86–92 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Loges, W.E., Jung, J.-Y.: Exploring the digital divide: internet connectedness and age. Commun. Res. 28, 536–562 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028004007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Perrin A, Duggan M (2015) Americans’ Internet Access: 2000–2015: as internet use nears saturation for some groups, a look at patterns of adoption. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/. Accessed 31 May 2017
  42. 42.
    Sackmann, R., Weymann, A., Hüttner, B.: Die Technisierung des Alltags: Generationen und technische Innovationen. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt (1994)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., Zuber, S.: Data resource profile: the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 992–1001 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Börsch-Supan A (2017) Survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 6. SHARE–ERICGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Olsson, T., Samuelsson, U., Viscovi, D.: At risk of exclusion? Degrees of ICT access and literacy among senior citizens. Inf. Commun. Soc. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1355007 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University Research Priority Program (URPP), Dynamics of Healthy AgingUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Center of Competence for GerontologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Psychological Ageing Research, Institute of PsychologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations