Generic platform for registration and online offering of assistance-on-demand (AoD) services in an inclusive infrastructure

  • Helen C. Leligou
  • Athanasoulis Panagiotis
  • Gianna Tsakou
  • Gregg Vanderheiden
  • Katerina Touliou
  • Otilia Kocsis
  • Nikos Katevas
Long Paper
First Online:
  • 217 Downloads

Abstract

An increasing percentage of the population needs assistance services for a wide range of activities related to their independent living, which can be delivered either by humans or by machines. While cloud computing and emerging ICT solutions have introduced new types of services and service delivery paradigms, it remains costly and difficult to set up and market assistance services addressing the needs of very narrow end-user groups. The current work presents the design of a novel open-source infrastructure (web-based platform) which enables diverse stakeholders to easily set up web-based assistance-on-demand platform instances. Each of these AoD instances can be used by service providers to register and offer assistance-on-demand (AoD) services for catering individual needs of persons with disabilities. In this way, narrow end-user groups can be reached and enjoy a gamut of assistance services. The AoD platform is implemented in the context of a larger Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII), which is being developed in the context of the Prosperity4All project. The functional requirements for the design of the AoD infrastructure were iteratively fine-tuned through the definition and analysis of representative use models (sets of personas and use cases). The AoD platform architecture consists of two major components: front-end (GUI) and back-end (service infrastructure). Their implementation is mainly based on the Django framework which enables a Model–Template–View (MTV) software architectural pattern with highly configurable and flexible components. The evaluation of a demonstration instance of the AoD platform with end-users identified its advantages and pointed out additional functionality needed: multi-language, multi-modality, embedded social media feeding, dedicated menu for highly flexible service, etc. The overall perceived usefulness of the specific demonstration AoD platform instance that underwent evaluation was higher than 80%. The proposed AoD platform provides a flexible and sufficiently generic web-based infrastructure for the cost-effective setup, registration and web publication of services that can accommodate a highly diverse range of assistance needs. Furthermore, it is suitable for use by a wide range of different stakeholder/user groups interested in addressing the needs of persons with disabilities or otherwise at risk of exclusion.

Keywords

Assistance-on-demand platform Service delivery infrastructure Accessibility Inclusive design Assistance service 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Prosperity4All is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) grant agreement 610510, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the Consumer Electronics Association Foundation. Work leading up to Prosperity4All was funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) grant agreement 289016 (Cloud4All), by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Dept. of Education under Grants H133E080022 (RERC-IT) by the Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Adobe Foundation, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation. The opinions and results herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.

References

  1. 1.
    Stuck, A.E., Walthert, J.M., Nikolaus, T., Büla, C.J., Hohmann, C., Beck, J.C.: Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc. Sci. Med. 48, 445–469 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watling, S.: Digital exclusion: coming out from behind closed doors. Disabil. Soc. 26(4), 491–495 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macdonald, S.J., Clayton, J.: Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disabil. Soc. 28(5), 702–718 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.732538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bentley, C.L., Powell, L.A., Orell, A., Mountain, G.A.: Addressing design and suitability barriers to Telecare use: Has anything changed? Technol. Disabil. 26(4), 221–235 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-150421 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing Report, 2015. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf. Accessed 05 July 2016
  6. 6.
    Malinowsky, C., Kottorp, A., Patomella, A.H., Rosenberg, L., Nygard, L.: Changes in the technological landscape over time: relevance and difficulty levels of everyday technologies as perceived by older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Technol. Disabil. 27(3), 91–101 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-150431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amara, Participatory Culture Foundation Translation Project. www.amara.org. Accessed 10 July 2016
  8. 8.
    Su, C.J., Chiang, C.Y.: IAServ: an intelligent home care web services platform in a cloud for aging-in-place. Int. J. Environ. Resour. Public Health 10, 6106–6130 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10116106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stuck, A.E., Walthert, J.M., Nikolaus, T., Büla, C.J., Hohmann, C., Beck, J.C.: Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc. Sci. Med. 48(4), 445–469 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Microsoft Azure. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/. Accessed 15 July 2016
  11. 11.
    Google CloudPlatform. https://cloud.google.com/appengine/. Accessed 15 July 2016
  12. 12.
    Django Framework. www.djangoproject.com/. Accessed 14 July 2016
  13. 13.
    RememberItNow Assistance Service. www.rememberitnow.com. Accessed 18 July 2016
  14. 14.
    Castlight Health Assistance Service. http://www.castlighthealth.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  15. 15.
    HealthTap Assistance Service. https://www.healthtap.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  16. 16.
    Microsoft HealthVault Assistance Service. https://www.healthvault.com. Accessed 18 July 2016
  17. 17.
    WebMD Assistance Service. http://www.webmd.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  18. 18.
    NHS Health Care Services. http://www.nhs.uk/pages/home.aspx. Accessed 18 July 2016
  19. 19.
    GreatAupair Assistance Service. http://www.greataupair.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  20. 20.
    Care4Hire Assistance Service. URL: https://www.care4hire.com/. Accessed on July 18, 2016
  21. 21.
    DomesticHelpIndia Assistance Service. https://domestichelpinindia.wordpress.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  22. 22.
    Care Assist Services. http://careassistservices.net/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  23. 23.
    Quikr Assistance Services. http://www.quikr.com/. Accessed 19 July 2016
  24. 24.
    GetMaid, On-Demand Premium Maid Service in NYC. http://getmaid.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  25. 25.
    TaxiBeat, Taxi Assistance Services. https://taxibeat.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  26. 26.
    BeMyEyes Assistance Service. http://www.bemyeyes.org/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  27. 27.
    Essential Accessibility Assistance Services. https://www.essentialaccessibility.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  28. 28.
    Booking, Accommodation Assistance Services. http://www.booking.com. Accessed 18 July 2016
  29. 29.
    SongKick, Concerts Assistance Service. http://www.songkick.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  30. 30.
    BandsInTown, Live Music Assistance Service. http://news.bandsintown.com. Accessed 18 July 2016
  31. 31.
    E-Food, Food Delivery Assistance Service. https://www.e-food.gr. Accessed 18 July 2016
  32. 32.
    Lotsa Helping Hands, Care Community Assistance Service. http://lotsahelpinghands.com/. Accessed 18 July 2016
  33. 33.
    You Describe, Audio Description Service. https://youdescribe.org. Accessed 18 July 2016
  34. 34.
    Prosperity4All, EU Research Project. www.prosperity4all.eu. Accessed 10 July 2016
  35. 35.
    Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII). www.gpii.net. Accessed 10 July 2016
  36. 36.
    WebAnywhere, a screenreader on the go. https://webanywhere.cs.washington.edu/. Accessed 5 Oct 2016
  37. 37.
    Vanderheiden, G.C., Treviranus, J., Clark, J.C., Peissner, M., Tsakou, G.: Prosperity as a model for next-generation accessibility. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 8516, 474–482 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stiegler, A., Zimmerman, G.: Gammification and accessibility. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging, pp. 145–154. Springer International, Cham (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    SingularLogic, 2015. Generic assistance on demand service infrastructure. Prosperity4All public deliverable D205.1. http://www.prosperity4all.eu/outcomes/public-deliverables/. Accessed 25 May 2017
  40. 40.
    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), Web Accessibility initiative, W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag. Accessed 20 July 2016
  41. 41.
    AoD code repository. https://github.com/silop4all/aod. Accessed 2 June 2017
  42. 42.
    AoD demonstration prototype. http://83.235.169.221:8025/en/. Accessed 2 June 2017
  43. 43.
    Touliou, K., Gemou, M., Riedel, T., Panou, M., Bekiaris, E.: A framework for evaluating the implementers’ experience in making existing products accessible: the Prosperity4All approach. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging, pp. 387–397. Springer International, Cham (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Sterea ElladaPsahna EviasGreece
  2. 2.SingularLogic S.A.AtticaGreece
  3. 3.Raising the Floor International (RtF-I)GenevaSwitzerland
  4. 4.Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH)ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations