Advertisement

Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 141–153 | Cite as

Enhancement of English learning performance by using an attention-based diagnosing and review mechanism in paper-based learning context with digital pen support

  • Chih-Ming ChenEmail author
  • Jung-Ying Wang
  • Mi Lin
Long Paper
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

Since English is probably the most popular second language, helping students learn English through technology is a critical issue in non-English-speaking countries. With the growth of digital pen technologies, developing an interactive learning environment that combines printed textbooks and a digital pen to support English-language classroom learning has become feasible. This work presents an attention-based diagnosing and review mechanism (ADRM) based on brainwave detection to help learners identify the passages with low attention level in a lesson as review targets in order to perform efficiently and accurately review processes while reading paper-based English texts with digital pen support in autonomous learning environments. Based on the true experimental design, this work aims to confirm whether the ADRM improves the review performance and sustained attention of learners while reading paper-based English texts with digital pen support. The research participants were a total of 108 students at an industrial vocational high school in Taipei City, Taiwan. All research participants were male and aged from 17 to 18 years. The experimental group used the ADRM while reading paper-based English texts with digital pen support, whereas the control group used the autonomous review while reading paper-based English texts with digital pen support. Experimental results reveal that the review performance of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group, proving that the ADRM improved review performance. The results also show that the field-dependent learners in the experimental group exhibited a great improvement in review performance in comparison with the field-independent learners. Additionally, the low-ability learners in the experimental group exhibited better review performance compared to those in the control group. Furthermore, learners with high attention level in the experimental group have exhibited better review performance and sustained attention than the learners in the control group. This work confirms that developing an ADRM based on brainwave detection to assist learners’ review processes is practicable. However, the usability and acceptability of using ADRM instead of human autonomous review should be further considered in the information society.

Keywords

Brainwave signals Digital pen English learning Attention recognition Attention-based diagnosing and review mechanism 

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, R.G.: Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Q. 19(4), 689–702 (1985)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, N.: A cover to cover solution: how open textbooks are the path to textbook affordability. The Student PIRGs, Chicago (2010). Retrieved from http://www.studentpirgs.org/sites/student/files/reports/A-Cover-To-Cover-Solution_4.pdf
  3. 3.
    Alvarez, C., Salavati, S., Nussbaum, M., Milrad, M.: Collboard: fostering new media literacies in the classroom through collaborative problem solving supported by digital pens and interactive whiteboards. Comput. Educ. 63, 368–379 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bromley, K.: Picture a world without pens, pencils, and paper: the unanticipated future of reading and writing. J. Coll. Read. Learn. 41(1), 97–108 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, C. K. (2009). Augmenting Wiki system for collaborative EFL reading by digital pen annotations. In: International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality ISUVR’09, pp. 43–46Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cunningham-Atkins, H., Powell, N., Moore, D., Hobbs, D., Sharpe, S.: The role of cognitive style in educational computer conferencing. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 35(1), 69–80 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, C.M., Wang, J.Y., Yu, C.M.: Assessing the attention levels of students by using a novel attention aware system based on brainwave signals. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 48(2), 348–369 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, C.M., Chung, C.J.: Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Comput. Educ. 51(2), 624–645 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, C.M., Hsu, S.H.: Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11, 153–180 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, C.M., Huang, S.H.: Web-based reading annotation system with an attention-based self-regulated learning mechanism for promoting reading performance. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 45(5), 959–980 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, C.M., Sun, Y.C.: Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Comput. Educ. 599(4), 1273–1285 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, C.M., Tan, C.C., Lo, B.J.: Facilitating English-language learners’ oral reading fluency with digital pen technology. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(1), 96–118 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C.M., Wang, H.P.: Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 33, 244–255 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, C.M., Wang, J.Y., Chen, Y.C.: Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self-regulated learning mechanisms. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(1), 102–114 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, C.M., Wu, C.H.: Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load and learning performance. Comput. Educ. 80, 108–121 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, L.H.: Web-based learning programs: use by learners with various cognitive styles. Comput. Educ. 54(4), 1028–1035 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Day, R.R., Bamford, J.: Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Higgins, L.H., Raskind, H.M.: The compensatory effectiveness of the quicktionary reading pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 20(1), 29–38 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsu, C.C., Chen, H.C., Su, Y.N., Huang, K.K.: Developing a reading concentration monitoring system by applying an artificial bee colony algorithm to e-books in an intelligent classroom. Sensors 12(10), 14158–14178 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu, P.J.-H., Hui, W., Clark, T.H.K., Tam, K.Y.: Technology-assisted learning and learning style: a longitudinal field experiment. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 37(6), 1099–1112 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang, H.Y., Wang, Y.H., Young, S.C.: Exploring elementary school students’ perceptions of applying the talking pen into English learning. Int. J. Sci. Eng. 2(3), 19–28 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hui, W., Hu, P.J.-H., Clark, T.H.K., Tam, K.Y., Milton, J.: Technology-assisted learning: a longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 24, 245–259 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keller, J.M., Suzuki, K.: Learner motivation and e-learning design: a multi-nationally. J. Educ. Media 29(3), 229–239 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lai, W.C., Chao, P.Y., Chen, G.D.: The interactive multimedia textbook: using a digital pen to support learning for computer programming. In: Advanced Learning Technologies of the ICALT 2007 on Seventh IEEE International Conference, pp. 742–746 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levy, M., Hubbard, P.: Why call CALL “CALL”? Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 18(3), 143–149 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Lam, C.M., Beale, I.L.: Relations among sustained attention, reading performance, and teachers’ ratings of behavior problems. Remedial Spec. Educ. 12, 40–47 (1991)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu, M., Reed, M.W.: The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 10, 419–434 (1994)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mampadi, F., Chen, S.Y.H., Ghinea, G., Chen, M.P.: Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: a cognitive style approach. Comput. Educ. 56(4), 1003–1011 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., Brønnick, K.: Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: effects on reading comprehension. Int. J. Educ. Res. 58, 61–68 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nozari, A.Y., Siamian, H.: The relationship between field dependent-independent cognitive style and understanding of English text reading and academic success. Mater. Sociomed. 27(1), 39–41 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H., Santiago, R.: The impact of learner characteristics on learning performance in hybrid courses among Japanese students. Electron. J. e-Learn. 5(3), 195–206 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    NeuroSky: NeuroSky MindWave (2015). http://press.neurosky.com/MindWave.html. Retrieved 15 Jan 2016
  34. 34.
    Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., Cohen, J.: Quiet interfaces that help students think. In: The 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 191–200 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pikulski, J.J., Chard, D.J.: Fluency: bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. Read. Teach. 58, 510–519 (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paolucci, R.: The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia 7, 123–150 (1998)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Piper, A.M., Weibel, N., Hollan, J.D.: Write-n-speak: authoring multimodal digital-paper materials for speech-language therapy. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. (TACCESS) 4(1), 1–20 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raca, M., Dillenbourg, P.: System for assessing classroom attention. In: The 3rd International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dunwell, I., Martínez-Mirón, E., Vargas-Cerdán, M., de Freitas, S., Liarokapis, F., et al.: Assessing NeuroSky’s usability to detect attention levels in an assessment exercise. In: HCI, New Trends, pp. 149–158 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rapp, D.N.: The value of attention aware systems in educational settings. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22, 603–614 (2006)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sabet, M.K., Mohammadi, S.: The eelationship between field independence/dependence styles and reading comprehension abilities of EFL readers. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 3(11), 2141–2150 (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salkind, N.J.: Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Steinmayr, R., Ziegler, M., Trauble, B.: Do intelligence and sustained attention interact in predicting academic achievement? Learn. Individ. Differ. 20(1), 14–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tinajero, C., Páramo, M.F.: Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: a re-examination of their relationship. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 67, 199–212 (1997)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vandenhoek, T.: Screen reading habits among university students. Inf. Commun. Technol. 19(2), 37–47 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wastlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., Archer, T.: Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: psychological and physiological factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21, 377–394 (2005)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R., Cox, P.W.: Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev. Educ. Res. 47, 1–65 (1977)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Woody, W.D., Daniel, D.B., Baker, C.A.: E-books or textbooks: students prefer textbooks. Comput. Educ. 55(3), 945–948 (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker, J.F.: Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Inf. Manag. 43, 15–27 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival StudiesNational Chengchi UniversityTaipei CityTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Multimedia and Game ScienceLunghwa University of Science and TechnologyTaoyuan CityTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipei CityTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations