Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 85–102 | Cite as

An approach to treat numerical information in the text simplification process

  • Susana Bautista
  • Raquel Hervás
  • Pablo Gervás
  • Javier Rojo
Long paper

Abstract

Public information services and documents should be accessible to the widest possible readership. In particular, information from these sources often takes the form of numerical expressions, which pose comprehension problems for many people, including people with disabilities, who are often also exposed to poverty, illiteracy, or lack of access to advanced technology. This paper presents an approach to treat numerical information in the text simplification process to make it more accessible. A generic model for automatic text simplification systems is presented, aimed at making documents more accessible to readers with cognitive disabilities. The proposed approach is validated with a real system to simplify numerical expressions in Spanish. This system is then evaluated and the results show that it is appropriate for the task at hand.

Keywords

Accessibility Numerical information Adaptation and text simplification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (TIN2009-14659-C03-01 Project), and the FPI grant program. The authors would like to thank Ricardo García for his help in this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Herrera, A., Macizo, P.: ¿Cómo leemos los números? (How we read numbers?). Ciencia Cognitiva 6(2), 44–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salguero, M., Alameda, J.: El procesamiento de los números y sus implicaciones educativas (Number processing and its educational implications). XXI Revista de Educación (Education Journal) 5, 181–189 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piaget, J., Inhelder, B.: Psicología del niño. Editorial Morata (1969)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butterworth, B.: Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(12), 534–541 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Landerl, K., Bevan, A., Butterworth, B., et al.: Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8{9-year-old students. Cognition 93(2), 99–125 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saggion, H., Gómez-Martínez, E., Etayo, E., Anula, A., Bourg, L.: Text simplification in simplext: making text more accessible. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural 47, 341–342 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medero, J., Ostendorf, M.: Identifying targets for syntactic simplification. In: Proceedings of Speech and Language Technology in Education (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carroll, J., Minnen, G., Canning, Y., Devlin, S., Tait, J.: Practical simplification of English newspaper text to assist aphasic readers. In: AAAI-98 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inui, K., Fujita, A., Takahashi, T., Iida, R., Iwakura, T.: Text simplification for reading assistance: A project note. In: Workshop on Paraphrasing (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Specia, L.: Translating from complex to simplified sentences. In: 9th International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burstein, J., Shore, J., Sabatini, J., Lee, Y.W., Ventura, M.: The automated text adaptation tool. In: HLTNAACL (Demonstrations), pp. 3–4 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Devlin, S., Unthank, G.: Helping aphasic people process online information. In: Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chandrasekar, R., Doran, C., Srinivas, B.: Motivations and methods for text simplification. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING ‘96), pp. 1041–1044Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siddharthan, A.: An architecture for a text simplification system. In: Proceedings of the Language Engineering Conference (LEC 2002), pp. 64–71 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Junior, A., Maziero, E., Gasperinm, C., Pardo, T., Specia, L., Aluisio, S.: Supporting the adaptation of texts for poor literacy readers: a text simplification editor for Brazilian Portuguese. In: Proceedings of the NAACL/HLT Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 34–42 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daelemans, W., Hothker, A., Sang, E.T.K.: Automatic sentence simplification for subtitling in Dutch and English. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1045–1048 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petersen, S.E., Ostendorf, M.: Text simplification for language learners: a corpus analysis. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Speech and Language Technology for Education (SLaTE) (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gasperin, C., Specia, L., Pereira, T.F., Aluisio, S.M.: Learning when to simplify sentences for natural text simplification. In: Proceedings of the Encontro Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (ENIA), Bento Gonalves, Brazil, pp. 809–818 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu, Z., Bernhard, D., Gurevych, I.: A monolingual tree-based translation model for sentence simplification. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woddsend, K., Lapata, M.: Learning to simplify sentences with quasi-synchronous grammar and integer programming. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klerke, S., Sogaard, A.: Simple, readable sub-sentences. In: ACL (Student Research Workshop) (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Devlin, S., Tait, J.: The use of a psycholinguistic database in the simplification of text for aphasic readers. In: Linguist Databases. CSLI, pp. 161–173 (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K.J.: Introduction to WordNet: an On-line Lexical Database. Int J Lexicography 3(4), 235–244 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Quinlan, P.: The Oxford Psycholinguistic Database. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bautista, S., Gervás, P., Madrid, R.: Feasibility analysis for semiautomatic conversion of text to improve readability. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Accessibility (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Belder, J., Deschacht, K., Moens, M.F.: Lexical simplification. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Research on Technology, Education and Communication (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peters, E., Hibbard, J., Slovic, P., Dieckmann, N.: Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff. 26(3), 741–748 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Power, R., Williams, S.: Generating numerical approximations. Comput Linguist 38(1), 113–134 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bautista, S., Hervás, R., Gervás, P., Power, R., Williams, S.: How to make numerical information accessible: experimental identification of simplification strategies. In: 13th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Lisbon, Portugal (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krifka, M.: Be brief and vague! And how bidirectional optimality theory allows for Verbosity and Precision. In: Sounds and Systems: Studies in Structure and Change: A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann (Trends in Linguistics 141), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 439–458 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams, S., Power, R.: Precision and mathematical form in first and subsequent mentions of numerical facts and their relation to document structure. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Athens (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grice, H.P.: Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, San Diego (1975)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    MacKay, D.J.: Sustainable energy—without the hot air (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qualifications, Authority, C.: Annual report and accounts. Technical report, Financial statements (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anula, A.: Tipos de textos, complejidad lingüística y facilicitación lectora. In: Actas del Sexto Congreso de Hispanistas de Asia, pp. 45–61 (2007)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Anula, A.: Lecturas adaptadas a la enseñanza del español como L2: variables lingüísticas para la determinación del nivel de legibilidad. In: Pastor y Roca (eds.) La evaluación en el aprendizaje y la enseñanza del español como LE/L2, Alicante, pp. 162–170 (2008)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bautista, S., Drndarevic, B., Hervás, R., Saggion, H., Gervás, P.: Análisis de la Simplificación de Expresiones Numéricas en Español mediante un estudio Empírico. Linguamática 4(2), 27–41 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Drndarevic, B., Stajner, S., Bott, S., Bautista, S., Saggion, H.: Automatic text simplification in spanish: a comparative evaluation of complementing modules. In: 14th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (Cicling) (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Padró, L., Stanilovsky, E.: FreeLing 3.0: towards wider multilinguality. In: Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey, ELRA (May 2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V.: GATE: a framework and graphical development environment for robust NLP tools and applications. In: Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bautista, S., Saggion, H.: Making Numerical Information More Accessible: Implementation of a Numerical Expressions Simplification Component for Spanish. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Special Issue on Readability and Text Simplification. Peeters Publishers, Belgium (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bautista, S., Hervás, R., Gervás, P., Power, R., Williams, S.: A system for the simplification of numerical expressions at different levels of understandability. In: NLP4ITA (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Siddharthan, A.: An architecture for a text simplification system. In: Language Engineering Conference, IEEE Computer Society, vol. 64Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    De Belder, J., Deschacht, K., Moens, M.F.: Lexical simplification. In: Proceedings of Itec2010: 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Research on Technology, Education and Communication (2010)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brouwers, L., Bernhard, D., Ligozat, A., Francois, T.: Syntactic Sentence Simplification for French. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Predicting and Improving Text Readability for Target Reader Populations (PITR) at EACL 2014, Gothenburg, Sweden (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Siddharthan, A., Angrosh, M.: Hybrid text simplification using synchronous dependency grammars with handwritten and automatically harvested rules. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2014), Gothenburg, Sweden (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susana Bautista
    • 1
  • Raquel Hervás
    • 1
  • Pablo Gervás
    • 1
  • Javier Rojo
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Aloha Mental ArithmeticTenerifeSpain

Personalised recommendations