An integrated semantic framework supporting universal accessibility to ICT

  • Vassilis Koutkias
  • Nick Kaklanis
  • Konstantinos Votis
  • Dimitrios Tzovaras
  • Nicos Maglaveras
Long paper


As we are moving rapidly to a digital economy, accessing and effectively using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in everyday life is widely recognized as an important requirement. However, the accessibility technologies that we have up to date are meeting the needs of only some, at a very high cost and, as a consequence, accessible ICT for all people still remains a major research and development goal. This work presents an integrated ontological framework for the semantic representation of terms and concepts (i.e., related to user needs and preferences (N&P) with respect to ICT use, as well as solutions, platforms and devices) that are required for addressing the universal accessibility in the scope of the Cloud4all project and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII). Cloud4all aims at advancing and building upon the concept of GPII through the development of the necessary tools and models for making ICT accessible for all by exploiting the cloud computing paradigm. The main goal of the proposed framework lays in the separation between generalized accessibility concepts, user interaction mechanisms and N&P with the particular details of different ICT artifacts. Thus, the framework aims at integrating concepts related with user N&P, as well as ICT solutions, platforms, devices and their customizable settings along with information concerning their vendors or implementers, in order to (a) offer the necessary expressiveness for defining/representing personal N&P across applications, platforms and devices, (b) link N&P with the conditions/context according to which these shall be applicable for (e.g., considering the user activity and the physical environment), (c) link interaction requirements (originated from user characteristics) with N&P and (d) support the Cloud4all matchmaking process through the mapping between N&P and application-specific settings based on semantic rules and automatic reasoning techniques.


Universal accessibility User needs and preferences Accessible ICT Ontologies Semantic modeling Cloud computing 


  1. 1.
    Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII): (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  2. 2.
    The Clou4all project: (2012). Accessed Oct 2013
  3. 3.
    Armbrust, M., et al.: A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53(4), 50–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Thematic Network on Assistive Information and Communication Technologies, D2.2—Synopsis of the information needs: (2011). Accessed Oct 2013
  5. 5.
    Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43(5–6), 907–928 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prcela, M., Gamberger, D., Jovic, A.: Semantic web ontology utilization for heart failure expert system design. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 136, 851–856 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Connor, M., Shankar, R., Tu, S.: Using semantic web technologies for knowledge-driven querying of biomedical data. Lecture Notes Artif. Intell. 4594, 267–276 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC 24751: Information technology—individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ETSI ES 202 746: Human Factors (HF); Personalization and User Profile Management; User Profile Preferences and Information (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The AccessForAll standardization group: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  11. 11.
    ISO 9999:2011: Assistive Products for Persons with Disability—Classification and Terminology (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm B., Kröner, A.: Decentralized user modeling with UserML and GUMO. In: Dolog, P., Vassileva, J. (eds.). Proceedings of Decentralized, Agent Based and Social Approaches to User Modeling Workshop (DASUM), pp. 61–65. Edinburgh, Scotland (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    RDF Primer: (2004). Accessed Oct 2013
  14. 14.
    OWL Web Ontology Language Overview: Available online via: (2004). Accessed Oct 2013
  15. 15.
    Sutterer, M., Droegehorn, O., David, K.: UPOS: user profile ontology with situation-dependent preferences support. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction, Sainte Luce, Martinique, pp. 230–235 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yurchyshyna, A., Faron-Zucker, C., Le Thanh, N., Zarli, A.: Adaptation of the domain ontology for different user profiles: application to conformity checking in construction. In: Cordeiro, J., Filipe, J. (eds.). WEBIST 2009, LNBIP, Vol. 45, pp. 128–141 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panagiotopoulos, I., Seremeti, L., Kameas, A.: An alignable user profile ontology for ambient intelligence environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Environments, pp. 270–276 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hella, L., Krogstie, J.: A structured evaluation to assess the reusability of models of user profiles. In: Bider, I., et al. (eds.) BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010, LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 220–233. Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kobsa, A.: Generic user modeling systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web, LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 136–154. Springer, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ISO/IEC 24751-2: “Access for all” personal needs and preferences for digital delivery (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ISO/IEC 24751-6: Information technology—framework for specifying a common access profile (CAP) of needs and capabilities of users, systems, and their environments (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sala, P., Fernandez, C., Mocholí, J.B., Presencia, P., Naranjo, J.C.: Implementation of the ISO/IEC 24756 for the interaction modeling of an AAL space. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Context Diversity. LNCS, Vol. 6767, pp. 210–219 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The VUMS project: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  24. 24.
    The GUIDE project: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  25. 25.
    The myUI project: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  26. 26.
    The VERITAS project: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  27. 27.
    The VICON project: (2012). Accessed Oct 2013
  28. 28.
    The ACCESSIBLE project: (2012). Accessed Oct 2013
  29. 29.
    The AEGIS project: (2012) Accessed Oct 2013
  30. 30.
    The ASK-IT project: (2009). Accessed Oct 2013
  31. 31.
    Castro, A.G. Normann, I. Hois, J. Kutz, O.: Ontologizing metadata for assistive technologies—the OASIS repository. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontologies in Interactive Systems, Liverpool, UK, pp. 57–62 (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    The INREDIS project: (2012). Accessed Oct 2013
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Schulz, M., Schmidt, S., Engelbrecht, K.-P., Möller, S.: Using device models for analyzing user interaction problems. In: Proceedings of 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS ‘11, pp. 303–304, New York (2011) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    LaPlant, B., Trewin, S., Zimmermann, G., Vanderheiden, G.: The universal remote console: a universal access bus for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 3(1), 76–80 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    The EASTIN database: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  37. 37.
    The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013
  38. 38.
    Baader, F., et al.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    The GPII wiki: (2012). Accessed Oct 2013
  40. 40.
    The Cloud4all Use Cases: (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vassilis Koutkias
    • 1
  • Nick Kaklanis
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Votis
    • 2
  • Dimitrios Tzovaras
    • 2
  • Nicos Maglaveras
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied BiosciencesCenter for Research and Technology HellasThermi, ThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Information Technologies InstituteCenter for Research and Technology HellasThermi, ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations