Designing for collaboration: a study in intergenerational social game design

Long Paper


This paper presents a study of a computer game designed for the elderly, allowing them to train their memory while playing the game. The game supports both a single-player and a multiplayer mode, in which the elderly can play with their friends or family using an embedded video chat application. The main question that is addressed in this paper is how the elderly gamers’ experience is influenced by the possibility to communicate directly with the other players. The study presents a comparison of the game experience and appreciation of older users and their (grand)children playing the game together, with or without the video chat application. Most importantly, the study shows that the added value of video chat is not limited to social contact, but that it also provides opportunities for the younger generation to assist the elderly during the game. In conclusion, the paper points out some intergenerational game design implications, and some future research suggestions.


Intergenerational communication Elderly Game design Game evaluation 


  1. 1.
    Aarsand, P.A.: Computer and video games in family life. The digital divide as a resource in intergenerational interactions. Childhood 14(2), 235–256 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackaert, A., et al.: A multi-disciplinary approach towards the design and development of value+ ehomecare services. In: Yogesan, K., Bos, L., Brett, P., Gibbons, M.C. (eds.) Handbook of Digital Homecare, pp. 243–267. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al Mahmud, A., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., Martens, J.-B.: Designing and evaluating the tabletop game experience for senior citizens. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: Building Bridges (NordiCHI 2008), pp. 403–406 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butcher, J.: Mind games: do they work? Br. Med. J. 336, 246–248 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bryce, J., Rutter, J.: Gendered gaming in gendered space. In: Raessens, J., Goldstein, J. (eds.) Handbook of Computer Game Studies, pp. 301–310. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Souza, C.S.: The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Druin, A., Bederson, B.B., Quinn, A.: Designing intergenerational mobile storytelling. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 325–328 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R.J., Oehlberg, L., Thornton, J.D., Nickell, E.: Social TV: designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 24(2), 136–154 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuyuno, I.: Brain craze. Nature 447(7140), 18–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gamberini, L., et al.: Cognition, technology and games for the elderly: an introduction to ELDERGAMES project. PsychNology J. 4(3), 285–308 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, C.S., Bavelier, D.: Exercising your brain: a review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning. Psychol. Aging 23(4), 692–701 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffiths, M.D.: The therapeutic value of video games. In: Goldstein, J., Raessens, J. Handbook of Computer Game Studies. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 161–171 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harley, D., Fitzpatrick, G.: YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 8(1), 5–20 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    IJsselsteijn, W., Nap, H.H., de Kort, Y., Poels, K.: Digital game design for elderly users. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, 17–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jakobson, R.: Linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok, T.A. (ed.) Style in Language, pp. 350–377. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1960)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khoo, E.T., Merritt, T., Cheok, A.D.: Designing physical and social intergenerational family entertainment. Interact. Comput. 21(1–2), 76–87 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2009). pp. 1693–1702. ACM Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction,vol. 1, pp. 77–86. British Computer Society, (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    LunaNL BV: Neurocampus. [Available] (2009). Accessed 26 May 2009
  20. 20.
    Mubin, O., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A.: Walk 2 win. Towards designing a mobile game for elderly’s social engagement. Proceedings of the 22nd British CHI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008, pp. 11–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nintendo of Europe: Dr. Kawashima’s brain training: how old is your brain? [Available] (2009). Accessed 26 May 2009
  22. 22.
    O’Connell, T.A.: The why and how of senior-focused design. In: Lazar, J. (ed.) Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users, pp. 43–92. Wiley, Chichester, England (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prates, R., de Souza, C., Barbosa, S.: A method for evaluating the communicability of user interfaces. Interactions 7(1), 31–38 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taylor, T.L.: Multiple pleasures: women and online gaming. Convergence 9(1), 21–46 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van den Abeele, V., Van Rompaey, V.: Introducing human-centered research to game design: designing game concepts for and with senior citizens.In: CHI’06 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in Computing Systems, 1469–1474. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: The magic box and collage: responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67(2), 165–178 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weisz, J.D., Kiesler, S.: How text and audio chat change the online video experience. uxtv08. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video, 9–18. ACM Press, New York, (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Whitcomb, G.R.: Computer games for the elderly. Proceedings of the conference on Computers and the quality of life, 112–115 (1990)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9(6), 772–775 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., de Ruyter, B.: Developing an adaptive memory game for seniors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fun and Games. LNCS, vol. 5294, pp. 170–181 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBBT-K.U.Leuven Future Health Department, Centre for User Experience Research (CUO)LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations