Shades of lightweight: supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging

Long Paper


Previous work suggests that older adults view communication with family as being worthy of time and dedication, and that they fail to understand the allure of lightweight contact. This paper presents findings from a field trial in which three generations of a family were linked through situated messaging devices, which, while designed to support lightweight messaging, also afford rich and expressive contact. Analysis suggests that communication via the devices provided a valuable additional dimension to the families’ existing practices, but that the type of messaging supported is best understood as one element in an amalgam of communication possibilities. Suggestions for complementary approaches are offered.


Older adults Grandparents Situated display Games Asymmetry Case study 


  1. 1.
    Ames, M., Go, J., Kaye, J., Spasojevic, M.: Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat. In: Proc. CSCW 2010. ACM Press, pp. 145–154 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T.: The social construction of displays: ecologically distributed networks and coordinate displays. In: O’Hara, K., Perry, M., Churchill, E., Russell, D. (eds.) Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies, pp. 170–190. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, H., Skov, M.B., Stougaard, M., Vetere, F.: Virtual Box: Supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play. In: Proc. OzCHI 2007. ACM Press, pp. 151–159 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, H., Vetere, F., Francis, P., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: “I wish we could get together”: exploring intergenerational play across a distance via a ‘Magic Box’. J. Intergener. Relatsh. 6, 191–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickinson, A., Newell, A.F., Smith, M.J., Hill, R.L.: Introducing the internet to the over-60 s: developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interact. Comput. 17, 1–22 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evjemo, B., Svendsen, G.B., Rinde, E., Johnsen, J.K.: Supporting the distributed family: the need for a conversational context. In: Proc. NordiCHI 2004. ACM Press, pp. 309–312 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoff, A.: Patterns of intergenerational support in grandparent-grandchild and parent-child relationships in Germany. Ageing Soc. 27, 643–663 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Brown, S., Seale, J., Petrie, H., Lauke, P., Ball, S.: Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes. In: Proc. W4A 2007. ACM Press, pp. 138–147 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keyes, C.L.M.: The exchange of emotional support with age and its relationship with emotional well-being by age. J. Gerontol. Psychol. Sci. 57B, 518–525 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khoo, E.T., Lee, S.P., Cheok, A.D., Kodagoda, S., Zhou, Y., Toh, G.S.: Age Invaders: Social and physical inter-generational family entertainment. In: CHI’06 Ext. Abstracts. ACM Press, pp. 72–79 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krause, N.: Longitudinal study of social support and meaning in life. Psychol. Aging 22, 456–469 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langdale, G., Kay, J., Kummerfield, B.: Using an intergenerational communications system as a ‘light-weight’ technology probe. In: CHI’06 Ext. Abstracts. ACM Press, pp. 1001–1006 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Designing a technological playground: a field study of the emergence of play in household messaging. In: Proc. CHI 2010. ACM Press, pp. 2351–2360 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Designing for elders: exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In: Proc. HCI 2008, Vol. 1. BCS Press, pp. 77–86 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults. In: Proc. CHI 2009. ACM Press, pp. 1693–1702 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyajima, A., Itoh, Y., Itoh, M., Watanabe, T.: “Tsunagari-kan” communication: Design of a new telecommunication environment and a field test with family members living apart. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19, 253–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Hara, K., Harper, R., Unger, A., Wilkes, J., Sharpe, B., Jansen, M.: TxtBoard: From text-to-person to text-to-home. In: CHI’05 Ext. Abstracts. ACM Press, pp. 1705–1708 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perry, M., Rachovides, D.: Entertaining situated messaging at home. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 16, 99–128 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Browne Hutchinson, H., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A.: Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM ToCHI 13, 313–346 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rode, J.A.: An Ethnographic Examination of the Relationship of Gender and End-User Programming. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romero, N., Markopoulos, M., Baren, J., Ruyter, B., Ijsselsteijn, W., Farshchian, B.: Connecting the family with awareness systems. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 11, 299–312 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rook, K.S.: Reciprocity of social exchange and social satisfaction among older women. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 145–154 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenthal, C.J.: Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. J. Marriage Fam. 47, 965–974 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rowan, J., Mynatt, E.D.: Digital family portrait field trial: Support for aging in place. In: Proc. CHI 2005. ACM Press, pp. 521–530 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saslis-Lagoudakis, G., Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D., Rouncefield, M.: Hermes@Home: Supporting awareness and intimacy between distant family members. In: Proc. OzCHI 2006. ACM Press, pp. 23–30 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sellen, A., Harper, R., Eardley, R., Izadi, S., Regan, T., Taylor, A.S., Wood, K.R.: HomeNote: Supporting situated messaging in the home. In: Proc. CSCW 2006. ACM Press, pp. 383–392 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turner, P., Tur-ner, S., van de Walle, G.: How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26, 287–296 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: The Magic Box and Collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67, 165–178 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wiley, J. Sung, J., Abowd, G.: The Message Center: Enhancing elder communication. In: CHI’06 Ext. Abstracts. ACM Press, pp. 1523–1528 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microsoft Research CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations