Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 235–243 | Cite as

User-Sensitive Inclusive Design

  • A. F. Newell
  • P. Gregor
  • M. Morgan
  • G. Pullin
  • C. Macaulay
Long Paper

Abstract

Although “User-Centred”, “Participatory”, and other similar design approaches have proved to be very valuable for mainstream design, their principles are more difficult to apply successfully when the user group contains, or is composed of, older and/or disabled users. In the field of design for older and disabled people, the “Universal Design”, “Inclusive Design” and “Design for All” movements have encouraged designers to extend their design briefs to include older and disabled people. The downside of these approaches is that they can tend to encourage designers to follow a traditional design path to produce a prototype design, and only then investigate how to modify their interfaces and systems to cope with older and/or disabled users. This can lead to an inefficient design process and sometimes an inappropriate design, which may be “accessible” to people with disabilities, but in practice unusable. This paper reviews the concept that the authors have called “User-Sensitive Inclusive Design”, which suggests a different approach to designing for marginalised groups of people. Rather than suggesting that designers rely on standards and guidelines, it is suggested that designers need to develop a real empathy with their user groups. A number of ways to achieve this are recommended, including the use of ethnography and techniques derived from professional theatre both for requirements gathering and for improving designers’ empathy for marginalised groups of users, such as older and disabled people.

Keywords

User-Centred Design Inclusive Design Universal Design Older and disabled people 

References

  1. 1.
    Alm, N.: Ethical issues in AAC research. In: Brodin, J., Ajessibm, E.B. (eds.) Methodological Issues in Research in Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Proc. Third ISAAC Research Symposium. Jonkoping, Universty Press, Sweden, pp. 98–104 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balandin, S., Raghavendra, P.: Challenging oppression: augmented communicators’ involvement in AAC research. In: Loncke, F.T., Clibbens, J., Arvidson, H.H., Lloyd, L.L. (eds.) Augmentative and Alternative Communication, New Directions in Research and Practice, pp. 262–277. Whurr, London (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benyon, D., Macaulay, C.: Scenarios and the HCI-SE design problem. Interact. Comput. 14, 397–405 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodker, S.: Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmichael, A., Newell, A.F., Dickinson, A., Morgan, M.: Using theatre and film to represent user requirements. In: Proceeding of Include Conference Royal College of Art, London, 5–8 April 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-Based Design. Wiley, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chesbrough, H.R.: Open Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarkson, P.J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., Lebbon, C.: Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population, pp. 18–20. Springer, London Homme/Machine & Assistance (4/5/6 July, France 2001) (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum. Macmillan, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    COST219ter: Vision in Action—Accessibility to Next Generation Networks. Brussels, 7 Feb 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickinson, A., Eisma, R., Syme, J., Gregor, P.: UTOPIA: usable technoloy for older people: inclusive and appropriate. In: Brewster, S., Zajicek, M. (eds.) A New Research Agenda for Older Adults BCS HCI 2002, pp. 38–39, London (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Eisma, R., Tiwari, L., Mival, O., Newell, A.F.: Domesticating technology in-home requirements gathering with frail older people. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction HCI, vol. 4, pp. 827–831. 22–27 June, Crete, Greece (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dishman, E.: Designing for the new world. In: Laurel, B. (ed.) Design Research, pp. 41–48. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunne, A.: Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience and Critical Design. RCA CRD Research, new edition published the MIT Press, 2006 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunne, A., Raby, F.: Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, London (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Mival, O., Syme, A., Tiwari, L.: Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people. In: Brewster, S., Zajicek, M. (eds.) New Research Agenda for Older Adults BCS HCI 2002, pp. 38–3, London (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., Newell, A.F.: Early user involvement in the development of information technology related products for older people. Int. J. Univers. Access. Inf. Soc. 3(2), 131–140 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fetterman, D.: Ethnology—Step by Step. Applied Social Research Methods. Sage, London (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gregor, P., Newell, A.F.: Designing for dynamic diversity making accessible interfaces for older people. In: Jorge, J., Heller, R., Guedj, R. (eds.) Proc. 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, ACM Press, Alcacer do Sal, Portugal, 22–25 May 2001Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gregor, P., Sloan, D., Newell, A.F.: Disability and technology: building barriers or creating opportunities. In: Zelkowitz, M. (ed.) Advances in Computers, pp. 284–346. Elsevier, Academic Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grudin, J.: Why personas work: the psychological evidence. In: Pruitt, J., Adlin, T. (eds.) The Persona Lifecycle, Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design, pp. 642–663. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Head, A.: Personas: setting the stage for building usable information sites. Online 27(4), 14–21 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Helander, M., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P. (eds.): Handbook of Human–Computer Interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hocking, C.: Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technol. Disabil. 11, 3–11 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hypponen, H.: The Handbook on Inclusive Design for Telematics Applications, Siltasaarenkatu 18A, 00531. Helsinki, Finland (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ikeya, N., Vinkhuyzen, E., Whalen, J., Yamauchi, Y.: Teaching Organizational Ethnography. Proceedings of EPIC 2007: The Third Annual Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, 3–6 October 2007, pp. 270–282. Keystone, Colorado (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J., Langdon, P., Robinson, P.: Designing a More Inclusive World. Springer, London (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K., Mattelmaki, T. (eds.): Empathetic Design: User Experience in Product Design. IT Press, Helsinki (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuhn, S., Winograd, T.: Profile: participatory design. In: Winograd, T. (ed.) Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley, London (1996)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kyng, M., Mathiassen, L. (eds.): Computers and Design in Context. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laurel, B.: Design Research and Practice, p. 273. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    McKenna, S., Marquis-Faulkes, F., Newell, A.F., Gregor, P.: Scenario-based drama as a tool for investigating user requirements with application to home monitoring for elderly people. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Crete (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morgan, M., Dickinson, A., Mival, O., Newell, A.F.: “The Utopia trilogy”—a series of video scenarios showing the challenges older people have with new technologies. http://computing.dundee.ac.uk/projects/utopia (2004)
  34. 34.
    Morgan, M., Newell, A.F.: Interface between two disciplines, the development of theatre as a research tool. In: HCII 2007, Beijing, 22–27 July 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4550, vol. 1, pp. 184–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muller, M.J.: Participatory design: the third space. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook: Mahwah, pp. 1051–1068. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muller M.J., Kuhn, S. (eds.): Special issue on participatory design. CACM. 36, 4 (1993)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Myerson, J.: IDEO: Masters of Innovation. Laurence King, London (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Newell, A.F.: Ordinary and extra-ordinary human computer interaction. Keynote address. Proceedings of the International Computer–Human Interface Conference, Amsterdam (1993)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Newell, A.F., Arnott J., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M.: Methodologies for involving older adults in the design process. In: HCII 2007, Beijing, 22–27 July 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4554, vol. 5, pp. 982–989. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Newell, A.F., Cairns, A.Y.: Designing for extra-ordinary users. Ergon Des, pp 10–16 (1993)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Newell, A.F., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M., Dickinson, A.: The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interac. Comput. 18, 996–1011 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Newell, A.F., Dickinson, A., Smith, M., Gregor, P.: Designing a portal for older users: a case study of an industrial/academic collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interac. 13(3), 347–375 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Newell, A.F., Gregor, P.: Human computer interfaces for people with disabilities. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 813–824. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Newell, A.F., Gregor, P.: User sensitive inclusive design—in search of a new paradigm. In: Proc A.C.M. Conference on Universal Usability, Washington, pp. 39–44, November (2000)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Newell, A.F., Gregor, G.: User sensitive inclusive design, JIM 2001 Interaction Homme/Machine & Assistance (4/5/6 July, France 2001), pp. 18–20 (2001)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Newell, A.F., Gregor, P., Alm, N.: HCI for older and disabled people in the Queen Mother Research Centre at Dundee University, Scotland, Experience Report in CHI 2006 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 22–27 April 2006, pp. 299–303 (2006)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nielsen, I., Pullin, G.: A simple secret for design. ACM Interact. 12(4), 48–50. ISSN:1072-5520 (2005)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, London (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    O’Gribbin: Dundee University, Private communication (2008)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Preece, J.: A Guide to Usability—Human Factors in Computing. Addison Wesley & Open University, London (1994)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pullin, G.: Design meets disability. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pullin, G.: When fashion meets discretion. (Awarded Best Full Paper) Include 2007, Royal College of Art, 1–4 April (2007a)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pullin, G.: Social mobiles and speaking chairs: applying critical design to disorder and disruption, discourse and disability. European Academy of Design, Izmir, Turkey, 11–13 April (2007b)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pullin, G.: I can’t talk now and other design stories: four assistive technologies for people with and without disabilities. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P. (eds.) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pullin, G.: Inclusion, inspriation and lightness of touch. In: Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., Lebbon, C. (eds.) Inclusive Design for the Whole Population, pp. 558–564. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pullin, G., Newell, A.F.: Focussing on extra-ordinary users. In: HCI 2007, Beijing, 23–25 July 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4554, vol. 5, pp. 253–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pruitt, J., Grudin, J.: Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of DUX 2003, CD ROM, 15 (2003)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rice, M., Newell, A.F., Morgan, M.: Forum theatre as a requirement gathering methodology in the design of a home telecommunication system for older adults. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26(4), 232–331 (2007)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Salvador, T., Howells, T.: Focus Troupe: using drama to create common context for new product concept end-user evaluations. Proceedings of the CHI 98 Conference. ACM Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sato, S., Salvador, T.: Playacting and focus troupes: theatre techniques for creating quick, intensive, immersive and engaging focus group sessions. Interactions. 6, 35–41 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sims, R.: ‘Design for all’: methods and data to support designers, PhD Dissertation, Loughborough University (2003)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sleeman, K.D.: Disability’s new paradigm, implications for assistive technology and universal design. In: Placencia Porrero, I., Ballabio, E. (eds.) Improving the Quality of Life for the European Citizen, Assistive Technology Research Series, vol. 4, pp. xx–xxiv, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sloan, D., Gregor, P., Rowan, M., Booth, P.: Accessible accessibility. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU 2000), Arlington (2000)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stephanidis, C. (ed.): User Interfaces for All 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum, London (2001)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Vanderheiden, G.: Fundamental principals and priority setting for universal usability. In: Proc. ACM Universal Usability Conference CUU 2000, Arlington (2000)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zajicek, M.: Successful and available: interface design exemplars for older users. Interact. Comput. 16, 411–430 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Newell
    • 1
  • P. Gregor
    • 1
  • M. Morgan
    • 1
  • G. Pullin
    • 1
  • C. Macaulay
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of DundeeDundeeScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations