Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 283–292 | Cite as

Designing spaces for every listener

  • Ann Heylighen
  • Monika Rychtáriková
  • Gerrit Vermeir
Long Paper

Abstract

Inclusive design aims at objects and environments that are accessible, usable and comfortable for all people throughout their entire lifespan. In architecture, this aim is usually associated with physical accessibility. Yet acoustic qualities may considerably impact usability and comfort as well, especially in spaces for listening. This case study explores the notion of acoustic comfort for all in the context of university education. One auditorium, situated in a historic building and subject to renovation in the near future, is studied in detail: acoustic obstacles are identified in collaboration with user/experts and are measured in situ; specific interventions are proposed in consultation with building professionals, technicians and conservation specialists and are tested using dedicated acoustic simulation software. The study draws attention to the importance of acoustic comfort for all and offers a first view of which solutions are possible and desirable and how these can be obtained.

Keywords

Architecture Acoustic comfort Inclusive design 

References

  1. 1.
    Froyen, H.: Barrières detecteren tussen mens en plek, bruggen. In: Froyen, H., Asaert, C., Dujardin, M., Herssens, J. (eds.) Ontwerpen voor Iedereen, Ministerie van de Vlaamse gemeenschap. Gelijke Kansen, Brussels (CD-Rom) (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wijk, M., Drenth, J., van Ditmarsch, M.: Handboek voor toegankelijkheid. Reed Business Information, Doetinchem (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rychtáriková, M., Van den Bogaert, M., Vermeir, G., Wouters, J.: Localisation of the speaker in a real and virtual reverberant room. NAG-J., J. Acoust. Soc. Neth. 184, 8 (2007) (CD-Rom)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vallet, M., Karabiber, Z.: Some European policies regarding acoustical comfort in educational buildings. Noise Control Eng J. 50(2), 58–62 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saher, K., Rychtáriková, M., Nijs, L., van der Voorden, M.: Prediction and Assessment of Acoustical Quality in Multifunctional Spaces for Mentally Challenged People. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Colloquium, ACOUSTICS ‘03, Zvolen—Šachtičky, pp. 35–38 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neyt, E.: Erfgoed voor iedereen. Master thesis, K.U.Leuven, Leuven (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vermeir, G., Mees, P., De Geetere, L.: Akoestische begeleiding van een ingrijpende renovatie van de concertzaal van het Paleis voor Schone Kunsten te Brussel. NAG-J., J. Acoust. Soc. Neth. 158, 27–38 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolejší, J., Slavko, P., Pouzar, L., Rychtáriková, M.: Acoustics of Unique Baroque Theatre in Český Krumlov. Journal Akustika—odborný časopis o akustice a vibracích, Czech Republic 9, 2–15 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergmans, A., De Maegd, C., Olyslager, W.A., Vande Gaer, D.: De Sint-Jan-de-Doperkerk van het Groot Begijnhof in Leuven. Monum. Landschappen 4, 6–34 (1985)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Leye, K., Dooms, E.: Akoestisch gebruikscomfort voor iedereen in auditoria. Case study: Grote Aula, Maria-Theresiacollege. Master thesis, K.U.Leuven, Leuven (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paulsson, J.: Universal Design Education. EIDD Sverige en Neurologiskt Handikappades Riksförbund, Göteborg (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Department for Education and Skills: Acoustic Design of Schools—A Design Guide. The Stationery Office (TSO), London (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cremer, L., Muller, H.A., Schultz, T.J.: Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics: Geometrical, Statistical and Psychological Room Acoustics, vol. 1. Applied Science/Elsevier, London (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jelínek, M., Rychtáriková, M., Vermeir, G.: Distribution of background noise in the classroom and its influence to speech intelligibility. In: Proceedings of Internoise 2007, 36th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, Istanbul (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houtgast, T., Steeneken, H.J.: A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 318–326 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duquesnoy, A.J., Plomp, R.: Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86(2), 537–544 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plomp, R., Duquesnoy, A.J.: Room acoustics for the aged. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68(6), 1616–1621 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Start, E.W., van Beuningen, J.: Digital directivity synthesis of DSP-controlled loudspeaker arrays: a new concept. NAG-J., J. Acoust. Soc. Neth. 153, 27–37 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duran Audio: http://www.duran-audio.com/. Accessed 20 Oct 2009

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Heylighen
    • 1
  • Monika Rychtáriková
    • 2
  • Gerrit Vermeir
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Urbanism & PlanningKatholieke Universiteit Leuven (K.U.Leuven)LeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Laboratory of Building Physics & Laboratory of AcousticsKatholieke Universiteit Leuven (K.U.Leuven)LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations