Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 195–207 | Cite as

Using disability data to estimate design exclusion

Long Paper

Abstract

Exclusion auditing is a process that can quantitatively evaluate the inclusive merit of different products, or alternative design decisions. The results from such an audit can provide prioritised directions for product improvement and support the business case for reducing the capability levels required to use mainstream products. The 1996/1997 disability follow-up survey, conducted by the Office of National Statistics, is currently the most comprehensive data source for estimating design exclusion in the UK. In this paper, the data source is explained in detail, and a method is presented that uses this data to estimate the exclusion associated with several tasks that occur in series or in parallel, illustrated through worked examples. Having evaluated how many people are excluded, one can investigate why they were excluded, thus generating design insights into how they could be included. Data from the survey is also converted to a series of stylised graphs, which are intended to inspire designers to think about the relationship between the demands required to use a product and the resulting levels of population exclusion.

Keywords

Inclusive design Usability data Product assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Dong, H., Keates, S. Clarkson, P.J.: UK and US industrial perspectives on inclusive design. In Proceedings of Include, Helen Hamlyn Centre, London, UK (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Philips Index: Calibrating the Convergence of Health care, Lifestyle and Technology. A web-based survey of 1300 Canadian internet users (2004). Last accessed Aug 08, available at www.philipsindex.ca
  3. 3.
    Microsoft: The wide range of abilities and its impact on computer technology: A research study commissioned by Microsoft Corporation and conducted by Forrester Research Inc (2003). Last accessed Aug 08, available at www.microsoft.com
  4. 4.
    Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human–Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Countering Design Exclusion. Springer-Verlag, London (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnard, P.J., May, J., Duke, D., Duce, D.: Systems interactions and macro theory. Trans. Comp. Human Interface 7, 222–262 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J.: Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Int. J. Univers. Access Inf. Soc 6(2), 119–135 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poulson, D., Ashby, M., Richardson, S.: USERfit: A Practical Handbook on User-Centred Design for Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology. HUSAT Research Institute for the European Commission (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aldersey-Williams, H., Bound, J., Coleman, R.: The methods lab: user research for design. Design for Ageing Network (1999). Last accessed Aug 08, available at www.education.edean.org
  10. 10.
    Steinfeld, A., Steinfeld, E.: Universal design in automobile design. In: Preiser, W., Ostroff, E. (eds.) Universal Design Handbook, pp. 50.1–50.13. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bajekal, M., Harries, T., Breman, R., Woodfield, K.: Review of Disability Estimates and Definitions: A Study Carried Out on Behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions. Department for Work and Pensions, London (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I~design research programme website: Last accessed Aug 08, available at www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/idesign3Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grundy, E., Ahlburg, D., Ali, M., Breeze, E., Sloggett, A.: Research Report 94: Disability in Great Britain. Corporate Document Services, London, UK (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    World Health Organisation: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. WHO, Geneva (1980)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin, J., Elliot, D.: Creating an overall measure of severity of disability for the office of population census and surveys disability survey. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. A 155(1), 121–140 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, J., Meltzer, H., Elliot, D.: The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, UK (1988)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarkson, P.J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I., Waller, S.: Inclusive Design Toolkit. EDC, Cambridge, UK (2007). Last accessed Aug 08, available at www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com
  18. 18.
    UK Data Archive: Last accessed Aug 08, available at www.data-archive.ac.uk
  19. 19.
    Langdon, P., Keates, S. Clarkson, P.J.: Developing cognitive capability scales for inclusive product design. In Proceedings of ICED, Stockholm, Sweden (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klein, J., Karger, S.A., Sinclair, K.A.: Digital Television for All: A Report on Usability and Accessible Design. Department Trade Industry, London, UK (2003). Last accessed Aug 08, available at www.digitaltelvision.gov.uk

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. D. Waller
    • 1
  • P. M. Langdon
    • 1
  • P. J. Clarkson
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering Design CentreUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations