Improving search engine interfaces for blind users: a case study

  • Patrizia Andronico
  • Marina Buzzi
  • Carlos Castillo
  • Barbara Leporini
LONG PAPER
First Online:

Abstract

This article describes a research project aimed at improving search engine usability for sightless persons who use assistive technology to navigate the web. At the beginning of this research, a preliminary study was performed concerning accessibility and usability of search tools, and eight guidelines were formulated for designing search engine user interfaces. Then, the derived guidelines were applied in modifying the source code of Google’s interface, while maintaining the same look and feel, in order to demonstrate that with very little effort it is possible to make interaction easier, more efficient, and less frustrating for sightless individuals. After providing a general overview of the project, the paper focuses on interface design and implementation.

Keywords

Accessibility Usability User interface Blind users Search engine 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Andronico P, Buzzi M, Leporini B (2005) Increasing usability of search engine interfaces for the blind. In: Proceedings of the HCII 2005, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brajnik G (2004) Achieving universal web access through specialized user interfaces. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 8th ERCIM UI4ALL workshop, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buzzi M, Andronico P, Leporini B (2004) Accessibility and usability of search engine interfaces: preliminary testing. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 8th ERCIM UI4ALL workshop, Vienna, Austria http://www.ui4all.gr/workshop2004/publications/adjunct-proceedings.html
  4. 4.
    Craven J, Brophy P (2003) Non-visual access to the digital library: the use of digital library interfaces by blind and visually impaired people. In: Technical report, Centre for Research in Library and Information Management, Manchester, http://www.cerlim.ac.uk/projects/nova/nova_final_report.pdf
  5. 5.
    Damery E (2003) JAWS for Windows version 4.51. New features and accessing the Internet. In: Proceedings of the 18th technology and persons with disabilities conference (CSUN), Los Angeles, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferworn A, Bodner R, Chignell MH (2000) Auditory WWW search tools. In: Proceedings of international conference on auditory display 2002, Atlanta, USA, April 2–5, 2000 http://www.icad.org/websiteV2.0/Conferences/ICAD2000/ICAD2000.html
  7. 7.
    Ivory MY, Yu S, Gronemyer K (2004) Search result exploration: a preliminary study of blind and sighted users’ decision making and performance. In: CHI 2004 extended abstracts, pp 1453–1456Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kobayashi M, Takeda K (2000) Information retrieval on the Web. ACM Comput Surv 32:144–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leporini B, Paternò F (2004) Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers, international journal universal access in the Information Society, special issue on “Guidelines, standards, methods and processes for software accessibility”, vol 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, No. 1, pp. 57–70Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leporini B, Andronico P, Buzzi (2004) Designing search engine user interfaces for the visually impaired. ACM international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility 2004, NY, USA, pp 57–66Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mann TM (1999) Visualization of WWW-search results. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on database and expert systems applications. pp 264–268Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milliman RE (2002) Website accessibility and the private sector: disability stakeholders cannot tolerate 2% access! http://www.rit.edu/∼easi/itd/itdv08n2/milliman.htm
  13. 13.
    Nicolle C, Abascal J (2001) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI. p 285, Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scapin DL et al (2000). In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors and the Web. Austin, TX, 19 June 2000 http://www.tri.sbc.com/hfweb/scapin/Scapin.html
  16. 16.
    Schmetzke A (2002) The accessibility of online library resources for people with print disabilities: research and strategies for change. In: Proceedings of ICCHP ‘02, Linz, Austria, July 15–20, 2002, pp 390–397Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner T, Davis P, Morris-Knower J (2002) Project at the Library of the Cornell University, Tutorial on “The principle of the Web searching”, http://www.mannlib.cornell.edu/reference/tutorials/search/ Cited 2005
  18. 18.
    Vaughan MW, Degen H, Resnick M, Gremett P (2003) Workshops: best practices and future visions for search user interfaces: a workshop. In: Proceedings of CHI ‘03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, April 5–10, 2003, Florida, USA, pp 1052–1053Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vegas J, de la Fuente P, Crestani F (2003) WebDocBall: a graphical visualization tool for Web search results. In: Proceedings of ECIR 2003. LNCS 2633, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 351–362Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W3C. Web accessibility Initiative, http://www.w3.org/wai

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrizia Andronico
    • 1
  • Marina Buzzi
    • 1
  • Carlos Castillo
    • 2
  • Barbara Leporini
    • 1
  1. 1.CNR-IITPisaItaly
  2. 2.Center for Web ResearchUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations