Advertisement

Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 67–81 | Cite as

User study on older adults’ use of the Web and search engines

  • Anne Aula
Long paper

Abstract

Ten older adults were interviewed about the motivational factors behind learning to use computers and the negative and positive aspects related to it. They were then given search tasks and were observed as they used search engines for finding information from the Web. All of the participants completed several search tasks during the search session. Although their performance in the search tasks was adequate, they faced several problems in the interaction. For example, text editing was difficult and understanding the structure of the Web and terminology used caused problems. Based on the observations, an “elderly friendly” search user interface is proposed.

Keywords

Older adults World Wide Web Search engines User study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank all the elderly computer users who volunteered for this study. I would also like to thank Eija-Riitta Kortesluoma and Heikki Pettilä for their help in recruiting the participants and also for having a positive attitude towards scientific research on this area. Professor Kari-Jouko Räihä, Johanna Höysniemi, and Tomi Heimonen are thanked for giving valuable comments on this paper. The study was financially supported by the Graduate School in User-Centered Information Technology and the Academy of Finland (project 178099).

References

  1. 1.
    Aula A (2003) Query formulation in web information search. In: Isaías P, Karmakar N (eds) Proceedings of the IADIS international conference WWW/Internet 2003, Algarve, Portugal, November 2003. IADIS Press, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 403–410Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aula A, Käki M (2003) Understanding expert search strategies for designing user-friendly search interfaces. In: Isaías P, Karmakar N (eds) Proceedings of the IADIS international conference WWW/Internet 2003, Algarve, Portugal, November 2003. IADIS Press, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 403–410Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chadwick-Dias A, McNulty M, Tullis T (2003) Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on universal usability (CUU 2003), Vancouver, Canada, November 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 30–37, DOI: 10.1145/957205.957212Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chadwick-Dias A, Tedesco T, Tullis T (2004) Older adults and web usability: is web experience the same as web expertise? In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2004 conference on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria, April 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp 1391–1394, DOI: 10.1145/985921.986072Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coleman R (1997) Designing for our future selves. Interactions 4(2):44–45, DOI: 10.1145/245129.245133Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comijs HC, Dik MG, Deeg DJH, Jonker C (2004) The course of cognitive decline in older persons: results from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 17:136–142, DOI: 10.1159/000076346Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cutler SJ, Hendricks J, Guyer A (2003) Age differences in home computer availability and use. J Gerontol Soc Sci 58B(5):S271-S280Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Czaja SJ, Sharit J (1998) Age differences in attitudes towards computers. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 53B(5):329–340Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisma R, Dickinson A, Goodman J, Syme A, Tiwari L, Newell AF (2004) Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Univ Access Inf Soc 3(2):131–140, DOI 10.1007/S10209-004-0092-xGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ellis RD, Allaire J (1999) Modeling computer interest in older adults: the role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety. Hum Factors 41(3):345–355Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox S (2004) Older Americans and the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf
  12. 12.
    Fozard JL (1997) Distribution of age and technology. Interactions 4(2):42–43, DOI: 10.1145/245129.245133Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glendenning F (2004) Education for older adults: lifelong learning, empowerment, and social change. In: Nussbaum JF, Coupland J (eds) Handbook of communication and aging research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 523–541Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R (2003) Older adults’ use of computers: a survey. In: Proceedings the 17th annual conference on human–computer interaction (HCI 2003): designing for society, Bath, UK, September 2003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gregor P, Newell AF, Zajicek M (2002) Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of the 5th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on assistive technologies (ASSETS 2002), Edinburgh, UK, July 2002, pp 151–156, DOI: 10.1145/638249.638277Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hawthorn D (1998) Cognitive aging and human computer interface design. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on computer human interaction (OZCHI’96), Hamilton, New Zealand, November 1996, pp 270–280Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hawthorn D (1998) Psychophysical aging and human computer interface design. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on computer human interaction (OZCHI’96), Hamilton, New Zealand, November 1996, pp 281–291Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffman DL, Novak TP, Venkatesh A (2004) Has the Internet become indispensable? Commun ACM 47(4):37–42, DOI: 10.1145/1005817.1005818Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hölscher C, Strube G (2000) Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. In: Proceedings of the 9th international World Wide Web conference (WWW9), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 2000, pp 337–346Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jansen BJ, Pooch U (2001) Web user studies: a review and framework for future work. J Amer Soc Inform Sci Technol 52(3):235–246Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karavidas M, Lim NK, Katsikas SL (2005) The effects of computers on older adult users. Comput Hum Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kubeck JE, Miller-Albrecht SA, Murphy MD (1999) Finding information on the World Wide Web: exploring older adults’ exploration. Educ Gerontol 25:167–183Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurniawan SH, Ellis RD, Allaire JC (2002) The impact of web self-efficacy, age, and web experience on bookmark manipulation. Univ Access Inf Soc 1(3):207–216, DOI 10.1007/S10209-002-0029-3Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Laguna K, Babcock RL (1997) Computer anxiety in young and older adults: implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Comput Hum Behav 13(3):317–326Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lines L, Hone KS (2004) Eliciting user requirements with older adults: lessons from the design of an interactive domestic alarm system. Univ Access Inf Soc 3(2):141–148, DOI 10.1007/S10209-004-0094-xGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matlin MW (2002) Cognition. Thomson Learning, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mead SE, Sit RA, Rogers WA, Jamieson BA, Rousseau GK (2000) Influences of general computer experience and age on library database search performance. Behav Inform Technol 19(2):107–123Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meyer B, Sit RA, Spaulding VA, Mead SE, Walker N (1997) Age group differences in World Wide Web navigation. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 1997 conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, April 1997. ACM Press, New York, pp 295–296Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morrell RW, Mayhorn CB, Bennet J (2000) A survey of World Wide Web use in middle-aged and older adults. Hum Factors 42:175–182Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morris, JM (1992) The effects of an introductory computer course on the attitudes of older adults towards computers. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI 1992 conference on human factors in computing systems, Monterey, California, May 1992. ACM Press, New York, pp 72–75, DOI: 10.1145/134510.134526Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mukanetti Association. Home page at http://www.mukanetti.net/eng.html
  32. 32.
    Pollock A, Hockley A (1997) What’s wrong with Internet searching. D-Lib Magazine, March 1997. Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march97/bt/03pollock.html
  33. 33.
    Powell DH, Whitla DK (1994) Profiles in cognitive aging. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rogers WA, Gilbert DK, Fraser E (1997) An analysis of automatic teller machine usage by older adults: a structured interview approach. Appl Ergonom 28(3):173–180Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rogers WA, Meyer B, Fisk AD (1998) Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: a focus group analysis. Hum Factors 40:111–125Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    SearchEngineWatch (2003) Searches per day. Available at http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156461.
  37. 37.
    Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L (2003) Older adults’ use of ICT in everyday life. Ageing Soc 23:561–582, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X03001302Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smith MW, Sharit J, Czaja SJ (1999) Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Hum Factors 41(3):389–396Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wagner LS, Wagner TH (2003) The effect of age on the use of health and self-care information: confronting the stereotype. Gerontologist 43(3):318–324Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zajicek M (2001) Interface design for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly, Alcácer do Sal, Portugal, May 2001. ACM Press, New York, pp 60–65, DOI: 10.1145/564526.564543Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zaphiris P, Ellis RD (2000) Mathematical modeling of age differences in hierarchical information systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on universal usability (CUU 2000), Arlington, Virginia, November 2000, pp 157–158Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zaphiris P, Kurniawan SH, Ellis RD (2003) Age related differences and the depth vs. breadth tradeoff in hierarchical online information systems. In: Carbonell N, Stephanidis C (eds) User interfaces for all. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2615. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 23–42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere Unit for Computer–Human Interaction, Department of Computer SciencesUniversity of TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations