Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people

  • R. Eisma
  • A. Dickinson
  • J. Goodman
  • A. Syme
  • L. Tiwari
  • A. F. Newell
Long paper

Abstract

The UTOPIA project (Usable Technology for Older People—Inclusive and Appropriate) is focused on developing effective methods for the early involvement of older people in the development of information technology-related products for people aged 60 and over, and on providing industry with tools to assist in the development of information technology products for such older people. An essential part of this methodology is building a diverse user base, forming a long-lasting partnership with older people, and developing approaches for effective interaction with this target user group. Our experiences with eliciting information from groups of older people about technology is described, together with a report on seminars for Scottish industry designed to raise an awareness of these issues.

Keywords

Older people Technology User involvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Banks J, Blundell R, Smith JP (2000) Wealth inequality in the United States and Great Britain. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, WP00/02.http://www.ifs.org.uk/workingpapers/wp0020.pdf. Cited 2000
  2. 2.
    Banks J, Smith Z, Wakefield M (2002) The distribution of financial wealth in the UK: evidence from 2000 BHPS data. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, WP02/21.http://www.ifs.org.uk/workingpapers/wp0221.pdf. Cited 2002
  3. 3.
    Clarkson J, Keates S, Coleman R, Lebbon C, Johnston M (2000) A model for inclusive design. In: Proceedings of Engineering Design Conference 2000, London, UK, June 2000Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman R (2002) Living longer—the new context for design. The Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickinson A, Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R, Tiwari L, Mival O, Newell AF (2003) Domesticating technology. In-home requirements gathering with frail older people. In: Proceedings of HCI International, Crete, Greece, June 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisma R, Dickinson A, Goodman J, Mival O, Syme A, Tiwari L (2003) Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people. In: Proceedings of Include 2003, London, UK, 25–28 March 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foresight Ageing Population Panel (2000) Finance. Office of Science and Technology.http://www.foresight.gov.uk/servlet/Controller/ ver=27/userid=2/Ageing_Report_2.pdf. Cited 2000
  8. 8.
    Foresight Ageing Population Panel (2000) Labour, leisure and learning. Office of Science and Technology.http://www.foresight.gov.uk/servlet/Controller/ ver=27/userid=2/Ageing_Report_1.pdf. Cited 2000
  9. 9.
    Goodman J, Gray P (2003) A design space for location-sensitive aids for older users. Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Technical Report, TR-2003–140Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R (2003) Age-old question(naire)s. In: Proceedings of Include 2003, UK, 25–28 March 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R (2003) Older adults’ use of computers: a survey. In: Proceedings of BCS HCI 2003, Bath, UK, 8–12 September 2003Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gregor P, Newell AF (2001) Designing for dynamic diversity—making accessible interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of WUAUC’01 (2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly) Alcácer do Sal, Portugal, 22–25 May 2001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregor P, Newell AF, Zajicek M (2002) Designing for dynamic diversity—interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of The Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 2002), Edinburgh, UK, 8–10 July 2002Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    GROS (General Register Office for Scotland) (2001) Population by sex and quinary age groups, 1911–2000.http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/grosweb/ grosweb.nsf/pages/populatn. Cited 2001
  15. 15.
    Hamill L (2000) The introduction of new technology into the household. Pers Technol 4:1-16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardy M, Baird C (2002), Is it all about aging: technology and aging in social context. In: Charness N, Schaie W (eds) Impact of technology on successful aging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kayser-Jones J, Koenig BA (1994) Ethical issues. In: Gubrium JF, Sanker A (eds) Qualitative methods in aging research. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2002) Defining design exclusion. In: Keates S et al. (eds) Universal access and assistive technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keates S, Lebbon C, Clarkson PJ (2000) Investigating industry attitudes to universal design. In: Proceedings of RESNA 2000, Orlando, FL, December 2000Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kubitschke L, Hüsing T, Strähler B, Stroetmann KA (2002) Older citizens (50+) and European markets for ICT products and services: representative data from the SeniorWatch user surveys. empirica Gesellschaft für Kommunikations-und Technologieforschung mbH (in German). Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lines L, Hone KS (2002) Research methods for older adults. In: Brewster S and Zajicek M (eds) A new research agenda for older adults, a workshop at BCS HCI 2002, London, UK, September 2002Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacDonald C, Storkey H, Raab G (2001) Older people in Scotland: results from the first year of the Scottish household survey, Social Inclusion Research Programme Research Findings No. 3. Scottish Executive Central Research UnitGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marquie JC, Jourdan-Boddaert L, Huet N (2002) Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behav Info Technol 21(4):273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Monk A, Baxter G (2002) Would you trust a computer to run your home? Dependability issues in smart homes for older adults. In: Brewster S and Zajicek M (eds) A New Research Agenda for Older Adults, workshop at BCS HCI 2002, London, UK, September 2002Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Newell AF, Gregor P (2000) User sensitive inclusive design in search of a new paradigm. In: Proceedings of CUU 2000, First ACM Conference on Universal Usability (USA 2000), Arlington, VA November 2000Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newell AF, Gregor P (2002) Design for older and disabled people—where do we go from here? Universal Access in the Information Society 2(1):3–7CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norman DA (1998) The design of everyday things. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park D, Schwarz N (eds) (2000) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: beyond human computer interaction. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reed D (2002) Towards dependability of technology assessment in the delivery of care to the elderly: a case study. In: Brewster S and Zajicek M (eds) A New Research Agenda for Older Adults, workshop at BCS HCI 2002, London, UK, September 2002Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Registrar General for Scotland (2002) Scotland’s Census 2001: 2001 Population Report Scotland.http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/grosweb/grosweb.nsf/pages/censushm. Cited 2002
  32. 32.
    Russell C (1999) Interviewing vulnerable old people: ethical and methodological implications of imagining our subjects. J Ag Stud 13(4): 403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Selwyn N (1997) Teaching information technology to the “computer shy”: a theoretical perspective on a practical problem. J Voc Edu Train 49(3): 395–408Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sloan M (2001) Web accessibility and the DDA. J Info Law Technol (JILT) 2.http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01–2/sloan.html. Cited 2001
  35. 35.
    Smith CD (1989) Transforming user-centered analysis into user interfaces: the design of new-generation products. In: Wood LE (ed) User interface design; bridging the gap from user requirements to design. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sutherland S (1999) With respect to old age: long term care—rights and responsibilities, a report by the Royal Commission on Long Term Care. The Stationery Office, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Syme A, Dickinson A, Eisma R, Gregor P (2003) Looking for help? Supporting older adults’ use of computer systems. In: Proceedings of Interact 2003, Zurich, Switzerland, September 2003Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Szmigin I, Carrigan M (1998) The usage and portrayal of older models in contemporary consumer advertising. J Mark Prac 4(8): 231–248Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    The Scottish Executive Health Department (2001) Better care for all our futures. Scottish ExecutiveGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Eisma
    • 1
  • A. Dickinson
    • 1
  • J. Goodman
    • 2
  • A. Syme
    • 1
  • L. Tiwari
    • 3
  • A. F. Newell
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Applied ComputingUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
  2. 2.University of GlasgowDepartment of Computer ScienceGlasgowUK
  3. 3.ICCAVEUniversity of Abertay DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations