The software accessibility of human-computer interfaces—ISO Technical Specification 16071

Long Paper

Abstract

This paper describes the recently published Technical Specification ISO 16071 from the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), along with the process through which the document has been developed. ISO TS 16071 contains guidelines on designing accessible software. This paper also relates the activities within ISO to other ongoing standardisation activities, within, for example, W3C and ETSI. Scope, contents, guidelines and the definition of accessibility in ISO 16071 are discussed in relation to other definitions. Finally, the process of turning the technical specification (TS) into an international standard (IS) is discussed.

Keywords

ANSI/HFES International Standards Organisation ISO 16071 Standardisation Technical specification W3C—WAI guidelines 

References

  1. 1.
    Gulliksen J, Harker S and Steger J (2001) The ISO approach to the development of ergonomics standards for accessibility. In: Nicole C and Abascal J (eds) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI, Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2002) HFES 200 human factors engineering of software user interfaces, part 1: software accessibility, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1998) ISO 9241 Software ergonomics with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11—guidance on usability. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1999) ISO 13407 Human centred design process for interactive systems. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (2003) ISO 16071 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—guidance on accessibility of human-computer interfaces. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorén C (ed) (1998) Nordic guidelines for computer accessibility. 2nd ed. Nordic Cooperation on Disability, Vällingby, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W3C Recommendation (1999) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG 1.0). Chisholm W, Vanderheiden G and Jacobs I (eds) World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/. Cited 5 May 1999Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1996), ISO 9241–10: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 10: dialogue principles. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1998a) ISO 9241–11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 11: guidance on usability. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1998b) ISO 9241–12: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 12: presentation of information. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1998c) ISO 9241–13: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 13: user guidance. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1997a) ISO 9241–14: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 14: menu dialogues. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1997b) ISO 9241–15: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 15: command dialogues. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1999) ISO 9241–16: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 16: direct manipulation dialogues. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Organisation for Standardisation (1998d) ISO 9241–17: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 17: form-filling dialogues. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HCIUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Human SciencesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations