Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 57–70

Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers

Long paper

Abstract

The application of appropriate Web site design and evaluation methods helps to ensure more usable and accessible Web sites. While in the literature guidelines and evaluation methods for accessibility and usability are given and discussed separately, we aim at identifying the relationships between these two concepts, in particular considering usability criteria for accessible Web sites. In this work, we propose a set of such criteria targeted to improving the navigability for a specific group of disabled users, i.e., vision-impaired people. The identification of the eighteen criteria suggested herein was performed through empirical feedback, by which potential issues were identified. Subsequently, a systematic method was developed on the basis of the analysis of potential solutions, resulting in a classification of the criteria according to usability aspects. Some example applications of the proposed criteria to three existing public administration Web sites are discussed.

Keywords

User interfaces Accessibility Usability Guidelines Vision impaired users 

References

  1. 1.
    Ivory MY, Hearst MA (2001) The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comp Surv 33(4):470–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rowan M, Gregor P, Sloan D, Booth P (2000) Evaluating Web resources for disability access. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS00), Arlington, VA, 13–15 November 2000, pp 80–84Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CAST: Center for Applied Special Technology (2004) Bobby accessibility evaluation tool for Web sites. http://www.cast.org/bobby. Cited 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UsableNet (2004) LIFT, an accessibility evaluation tool. http://www.usablenet.com/lift. Cited 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nist Web Metrics (2004) http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/WebTools/tech.HTML. Cited 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stephanidis C, Akoumianakis D, Sfyrakis M, Paramythis A (1998) Universal accessibility in HCI: process-oriented design guidelines and tool requirements. In: Stephanidis C, Waern A (eds) Proceedings of the 4th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, Stockholm, Sweden, 19–21 October 1998Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grammenos D, Akoumianakis D, Stephanidis C (2000) Integrated support for working with guidelines: the Sherlock guideline management aystem. Int J Interact Comp 12(3):281–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    WAI Accessibility Guidelines (1999) Web Accessibility Initiative, World Wide Web Consortium, 1999. http://www.w3.org/wai. Cited 1999Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leporini B, Paternò F (2002) Criteria for usability of accessible Web sites. In: Proceedings of the 7th ERCIM Workshop. User Interfaces for All, Paris (Chantilly), France, 23–25 October 2002, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 2615, pp. 43–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISTI-CNRPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations