Foundations of Computational Mathematics

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 599–609 | Cite as

Real Computational Universality: The Word Problem for a Class of Groups with Infinite Presentation

Article

Abstract

The word problem for discrete groups is well known to be undecidable by a Turing Machine; more precisely, it is reducible both to and from and thus equivalent to the discrete Halting Problem. The present work introduces and studies a real extension of the word problem for a certain class of groups which are presented as quotient groups of a free group and a normal subgroup. As a main difference to discrete groups these groups may be generated by uncountably many generators with index running over certain sets of real numbers. We study the word problem for such groups within the Blum–Shub–Smale (BSS) model of real number computation. The main result establishes the word problem to be computationally equivalent to the Halting Problem for such machines. It thus gives the first non-trivial example of a problem complete, that is, computationally universal for this model.

Keywords

Word problem for groups Computational universality Blum–Shub–Smale model Real halting problem 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

20F10 68Q17 68Q10 

References

  1. 1.
    L. Blum, M. Shub, S. Smale, On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers: \(\protect\mathcal{NP}\) -completeness, recursive functions, and universal machines, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 21, 1–46 (1989). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Blum, F. Cucker, M. Shub, S. Smale, Complexity and Real Computation (Springer, New York, 1998). Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.W. Boone, The word problem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 44, 265–269 (1958). CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Bourgade, Separations et transferts dans la hiérarchie polynomiale des groupes abéliens infinis, Math. Log. Q. 47, 493–502 (2001). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.W. Cannon, G.R. Conner, The combinatorial structure of the Hawaiian earring group, Topology Appl. 106, 225–271 (2000). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Cucker, The arithmetical hierarchy over the reals, J. Log. Comput. 2(3), 375–395 (1992). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Derksen, E. Jeandel, P. Koiran, Quantum automata and algebraic groups, J. Symb. Comput. 39, 357–371 (2005). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Gaßner, The \(\mathcal{P}=\mathcal{DNP}\) problem for infinite abelian groups, J. Complex. 17, 574–583 (2001). MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.B. Goode, Accessible telephone directories, J. Symb. Log. 59, 92–105 (1994). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Higman, B.H. Neumann, H. Neumann, Embedding theorems for groups, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 24, 247–254 (1949). CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.F. Holt, S. Rees, C.E. Röver, R.M. Thomas, Groups with context-free co-word problem, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 71(3), 643–657 (2005). MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Lang, SL 2(ℝ) (Springer, New York, 1985). Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.C. Lyndon, P.E. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1977). MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Meer, M. Ziegler, An explicit solution to Post’s problem over the reals, J. Complex. 24(1), 3–15 (2008). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Michaux, Ordered rings over which output sets are recursively enumerable, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 112, 569–575 (1991). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.F. Miller III, Decision problems for groups—survey and reflections, in Algorithms and Classification in Combinatorial Group Theory, ed. by G. Baumslag, C.F. Miller III. Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 1 (Springer, New York, 1992), pp. 1–59. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.E. Muller, P.E. Schupp, Groups, the theory of ends, and context-free languages, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 26, 295–310 (1983). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.S. Novikov, On the algorithmic unsolvability of the word problem in group theory. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklov 44 (1955). Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Poizat, Les Petits Cailloux (Aléas, Lyon, 1995). MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Prunescu, A model-theoretic proof for \(\mathcal{P}\neq\mathcal{NP}\) over all infinite abelian groups, J. Symb. Log. 67, 235–238 (2002). MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.J. Rotman, An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, 4th edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1995). MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.V. Tucker, Computability and the algebra of fields, J. Symb. Log. 45, 103–120 (1980). MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SFoCM 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theoretical Computer ScienceBTU CottbusCottbusGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and MathematicsUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations