Poiesis & Praxis

, Volume 7, Issue 1–2, pp 1–4 | Cite as

Technoscience and technology assessment



  1. Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. Open University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  2. Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haraway DJ (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium FemaleMan(c)_Meets_OncoMouse(TM). Routledge, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Hottois G (1984) Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, AubierGoogle Scholar
  5. Knorr Cetina K (1999) Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Latour B (1987) Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Nordmann A (2006) Collapse of distance: epistemic strategies of science and technoscience. Dan Yearb Philos 41:7–34Google Scholar
  8. Pickering A (ed) (1992) Science as practice and culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Rheinberger H-J (1997) Toward a history of epistemic things. Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Weber J (2001) Umkämpfte Bedeutungen: Natur im Zeitalter der Technoscience. Dissertation (Kulturwissenschaften) Universität BremenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Technology AssessmentAustrian Academy of SciencesWienAustria

Personalised recommendations