Advertisement

Limnology

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Increased acetylcholinesterase inhibitor sensitivity as an intergenerational response to short-term acetylcholinesterase inhibitor exposure in Scapholeberis kingi

  • Makoto IshimotaEmail author
  • Naruto Tomiyama
Research paper

Abstract

To determine the potential long-term risks associated with continual use of pesticides, we investigated (1) whether short-term exposure (48 h) of first generation (1G) Scapholeberis kingi to two acetylcholinesterase-inhibitor insecticides, pyraclofos and pirimicarb, would alter acetylcholinesterase-inhibitor sensitivity (based on immobility) in the second generation (2G), (2) whether acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity-levels could be related to any observed change in sensitivity, and (3) whether intrinsic growth rates (r) in field cladocerans could vary between generations. We collected field-clone populations of different sensitivities from four sites in an agricultural area. Neonates (< 24 h old) were selected after insecticidal exposure for 48 h, then cultured without insecticide to obtain second-generation neonates. Based on the 48 h EC50 values, 2G neonates in the majority of the selected clones were more sensitive to the insecticides compared to the control groups. Changes in sensitivity could not be explained by AChE activity in the 2G. Although the r values decreased in few selected clones, these values recovered in the 2G suggesting that they could rapidly adapt to insecticidal exposure at the population level. The findings from our study can contribute to a better understanding in the potential risks of insecticides to aquatic organisms.

Keywords

Cladocera Insecticide Acetylcholinesterase Multi-generational studies Field population 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Yuichi Miyabara from Shinshu University for measuring the TOC and ion concentrations in the water samples. We thank Yusuke Oda from Shinshu University for providing information about the medrc package. We thank Professors Risako Tajiki-Nishino and Tomoki Fukuyama for giving advice on AChE activity analysis in cladocerans. We thank our technical staff, Aya Kitahara, for her support. Furthermore, we thank Professor Kazutoshi Ohyama for the opportunity to conduct this study. We would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp) for English language editing. The experiments performed comply with the current laws of the country.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving animals

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or vertebrates performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this study.

Supplementary material

10201_2019_598_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (234 kb)
Supplementary file1 (PDF 234 kb)

References

  1. Andersen TH, Tjørnhøj R, Wollenberger L, Slothuus T, Baun A (2006) Acute and chronic effects of pulse exposure of Daphnia magna to dimethoate and pirimicarb. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1187–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (2007) APVMA Product Number 59304. Coopers Colleague Broad Spectrum Sheep and Lamb Drench. https://www.apvma.gov.au. Accessed 5 May 2019
  3. Bendis RJ, Relyea RA (2014) Living on the edge: populations of two zooplankton species living closer to agricultural fields are more resistant to a common insecticide. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:2835–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossuyt BTA, Janssen CR (2005) Copper toxicity to different field-collected cladoceran species: intra- and inter-species sensitivity. Environ Pollut 136:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.11.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brausch JM, Smith PN (2009) Development of resistance to cyfluthrin and naphthalene among Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology 18:600–609.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0318-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Campos B, Altenburger R, Gómez C, Lacorte S, Piña B, Barata C, Luckenbach T (2014) First evidence for toxic defense based on the multixenobiotic resistance (MXR) mechanism in Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol 148:139–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Case TJ (2000) An illustrated guide to theoretical ecology. Oxford University, New York Chiba prefecture (2012). Document for Tega pond and the problem for the catchment of the pond. p 3, 14. (in Japanese) https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/suiho/kasentou/teganuma/documents/20genjoukadai.pdf
  8. Clark SL, Ogle RS, Gantner A, Hall LW Jr, Mitchell G, Giddings J, McCoole M, Dobbs M, Henry K, Valenti T (2015) Comparative sensitivity of field and laboratory populations of Hyalella azteca to the pyrethroid insecticides bifenthrin and cypermethrin. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:2250–2262.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2907 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Coors A, Vanoverbeke J, De Bie T, De Meester L (2009) Land use, genetic diversity and toxicant tolerance in natural populations of Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol 95:71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.08.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowgill UM, Milazzo DP (1991) The Sensitivity of Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia magna to seven chemicals utilizing the three-brood test. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 20:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eytcheson SA, LeBlanc GA (2018) Hemoglobin levels modulate nitrite toxicity to Daphnia magna. Sci Repd 8:7172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox J (2005) The R commander: a basic statistics graphical user interface to R. J Stat Softw 14:1–42. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v14/i09/. Accessed 5 May 2019
  13. Geraldes AM, Boavida MJ (2004) What factors affect the pelagic cladocerans of the meso-eutrophic Azibo Reservoir? Ann Limnol Int J Lim 40:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerhard D, Ritz C (2017) Marginalization in nonlinear mixed-effects models with an application to dose-response analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.02502. Accessed 26 July 2019
  15. Guilhermino L, Lopes MC, Carvalho AP, Soares AMVM (1996) Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity as effect criterion in acute tests with juvenile Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 32:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haap T, Schwarz S, Köhler HR (2016) Metallothionein and Hsp70 trade-off against one another in Daphnia magna cross-tolerance to cadmium and heat stress. Aquat Toxicol 170:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanazato T (2001) Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: an ecological perspective. Environ Pollut 112:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Havens KE (1994) An experimental comparison of the effects of two chemical stressors on a freshwater zooplankton assemblage. Environ Pollut 84:245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)90135-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P, Heiberger RM, Schuetzenmeister A, Scheibe S (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. R package version 1.4-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  21. Ishimota M, Nakajima D, Sakamoto M, Miyabara Y (2019) Water-soluble bioactive natural compounds in Trapa japonica leaves: temporal changes in chemical composition and effects on cladocerans. Ecol Res 34:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1996) Water quality-determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea)—Acute Toxicity test. ISO 6341Google Scholar
  23. Jansen M, Coors A, Stoks R, Vanoverbeke J, Schepens M, Voogt P (2015) Experimental evolution reveals high insecticide tolerance in Daphnia inhabiting farmland ponds. Evol Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12253(ISSN 1752-4571) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Jemec A, Drobne D, Tišler T, Trebše P, Roš M, Sepčić K (2007) The applicability of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase in Daphnia magna toxicity test. Comp Biochem Physiol 144:303–309Google Scholar
  25. Jeon J, Kretschmann A, Escher B, Hollender J (2013) Characterization of acetylcholinesterase inhibition and energy allocation in Daphnia magna exposed to carbaryl. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 98:28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.09.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liess M, Pieters BJ, Duquesne S (2006) Long-term signal of population disturbance after pulse exposure to an insecticide: rapid recovery of abundance, persistent alteration of structure. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1326–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopes I, Moreira-Santos M, Osten RJ, Baird DJ, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R (2011) Suitability of five cladoceran species from Mexico for in situ experimentation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:111–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Luciana R, Reno U, Gervasio S, Horacio T, Gagneten AM (2014) Effect of metals on Daphnia magna and cladocerans representatives of the Argentinean fluvial littoral. J Environ Biol 35:689–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mano H, Sakamoto M, Tanaka Y (2010) A comparative study of insecticide toxicity among seven cladoceran species. Ecotoxicology 19:1620–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mano H, Tanaka Y (2017) Spatial difference in genetic variation for fenitrothion tolerance between local populations of Daphnia galeata in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecotoxicology 26:1358–1365.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-017-1860-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University, New York, p 375Google Scholar
  32. Muyssen BTA, Janssen CR, Bossuyt BTA (2002) Tolerance and acclimation to zinc of field-collected Daphnia magna populations. Aquat Toxicol 56:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nohara S, Iwakuma T (1996) Residual pesticides and their toxicity to freshwater shrimp in the littoral and pelagic zones of Lake Kasumigaura Japan. Chemosphere 33:1417–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2004) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals, section 2, test No. 202: Daphnia sp., acute immobilization testGoogle Scholar
  35. Pieters BJ, Liess M (2006) Maternal nutritional state determines the sensitivity of Daphnia magna offspring to short-term fenvalerate exposure. Aquat Toxicol 76:268–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Printes LB, Callaghan A (2004) A comparative study on the relationship between acetylcholinesterase activity and acute toxicity in Daphnia magna exposed to anticholinesterase insecticides. Environ Toxicol 23:1241–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1897/03-202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.6.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  38. Ritz C, Cedergreen N, Jensen JE, Streibig JC (2006) Relative potency in nonsimilar dose–response curves. Weed Sci 54:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sánchez M, Ferrando MD, Sancho E, Andreu E (2000) Physiological perturbations in several generations of Daphnia magna Straus exposed to diazinon. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silva ARR, Santos CSA, Ferreira NGC, Morgado R, Cardoso DN, Cruz A, Mendo S, Soares AMVM, Loureiro S (2018) Multigenerational effects of carbendazim in Daphnia magna: From a subcellular to a population level. Environ Toxicol Chem 38:412–422.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Struger J, Grabuski J, Cagampan S, Rondeau M, Sverko E, Marvin C (2016) Occurrence and distribution of carbamate pesticides and metalaxyl in Southern Ontario surface waters 2007–2010. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 96:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tamura J, Ogura N (1994) Relationship between herbicide’s fate of the river following into lake Teganuma and its molecular structure. J Jpn Soc Water Environ 17:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toumi H, Boumaiza M, Millet M, Radetski CM, Felten V, Férard JF (2015) Is acetylcholinesterase a biomarker of susceptibility in Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Cladocera) after deltamethrin exposure? Chemosphere 120:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wheeler MW, Park RM, Bailer AJ (2006) Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1441–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yamamoto T, Nozaki K (2004) Microcrustacean abundance as potential food resources for larval and juvenile fishes in a reed zone of lake Biwa. Suisanzoshoku 52:145–152Google Scholar
  46. Yu TH, Dafre AL, de Aragão UG, Franciscon E (2015) CYP-dependent induction of glutathione S-transferase in Daphnia similis exposed to a disperse azo dye. Ecotoxicology 24:232–237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1348-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zalizniak L, Nugegoda D (2006) Effect of sublethal concentrations of chlorpyrifos on three successive generations of Daphnia carinata. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 64:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhuang S, Zhanga Z, Zhanga W, Baoa L, Xuc C, Zhang H (2015) Enantioselective developmental toxicity and immune toxicity of pyraclofos toward zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat Toxicol 159:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Limnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Residue Analysis II, Chemistry DivisionThe Institute of Environmental ToxicologyIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations