Advertisement

Limnology

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Temporal and spatial variations in carbon and nutrient loads, ion chemistry and trophic status of the Ganga River: a watershed-scale study

  • Ekabal Siddiqui
  • Jitendra PandeyEmail author
Research paper

Abstract

Ganga, a river of global significance, is under increasing pressure from excessive release of carbon and nutrients. We conducted the first detailed watershed-scale study to assess water quality status and possible drivers in different segments of the Ganga River. For this, we analyzed 24 water quality variables from March 2016 to February 2018, at 7 study sites, along a 2320-km river stretch. The data revealed large spatiotemporal variations in total dissolved solids, major ions, nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand, chlorophyll a biomass (Chl a) and gross primary productivity. Principal component analysis identified three major determinants (source input, stream flow, and tidal influence) explaining over 84% of the total variance. A high concentration of oxygen-demanding chemicals, especially in the middle segment, underscores the importance of restoration efforts that address BOD reduction alone. This work advances our understanding with respect to inter-segment variations and factors regulating Ganga River water quality and demonstrates the significance of watershed-scale studies for integrated river basin management.

Keywords

Eutrophication Ganga River Indicator Integrated river basin management Pollution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Coordinators, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany and DST-FIST, Banaras Hindu University for facilities, and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research [Grant no. 09/013(0611)/2015-EMR-I], New Delhi, for funding support as a fellowship to ES.

Supplementary material

10201_2019_575_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Aizaki M, Otsuki A, Fukushima T, Hosomi M, Muraoka K (1981) Application of Carlson’s trophic state index to Japanese lakes and relationships between the index and other parameters. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie Verhandlungen 21:675–681Google Scholar
  2. Aktar MW, Paramasivam M, Ganguly M, Purkait S, Sengupta D (2010) Assessment and occurrence of various heavy metals in surface water of Ganga River around Kolkata: a study for toxicity and ecological impact. Environ Monit Assess 160:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Beg KR, Ali S (2008) Chemical contaminants and toxicity of Ganga river sediment from up and down stream area at Kanpur. Am J Environ Sci 4:362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beman JM, Arrigo KR, Matson PA (2005) Agricultural runoff fuels large phytoplankton blooms in vulnerable areas of the ocean. Nature 434:211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhutiani R, Khanna DR, Kulkarni DB, Ruhela M (2016) Assessment of Ganga river ecosystem at Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India with reference to water quality indices. Appl Water Sci 6:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown RM, Mc Clelland NI, Deininger RA, O’Connor MF (1972) A water quality index—crashing the psychological barrier. In: Thomas WA (ed) Indicators of environmental quality. Plenum Press, New York, pp 173–182Google Scholar
  8. Bukaveckas PA, Barry LE, Beckwith MJ, David V, Lederer B (2011) Factors determining the location of the chlorophyll maximum and the fate of algal production within the tidal freshwater James River. Estuaries Coasts 34:569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cary L, Alexandre A, Meunier JD, Boeglin JL, Braun JJ (2005) Contribution of phytoliths to the suspended load of biogenic silica in the Nyong basin rivers (Cameroon). Biogeochem 74:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Central Pollution Control Board, (2013). Pollution assessment: River Ganga, CPCB, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dwivedi S, Mishra S, Tripathi RD (2018) Ganga water pollution: a potential health threat to inhabitants of Ganga Basin. Environ Int 117:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holland HD (1978) The chemistry of the atmosphere and oceans, vol 1. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Houser JN, Richardson WB (2010) Nitrogen and phosphorus in the Upper Mississippi River: transport, processing and effects on the river ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 640:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang J, Huang Y, Zhang Z (2014) Coupled effects of natural and anthropogenic controls on seasonal and spatial variations of river water quality during base flow in a coastal watershed of Southeast China. PLoS One 9:e91528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jain CK (2002) A hydro-chemical study of a mountainous watershed of the Ganga India. Water Res 36:1262–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khan MYA, Gani KM, Chakrapani GJ (2017) Spatial and temporal variations of physicochemical and heavy metal pollution in Ramganga River—a tributary of River Ganges, India. Environ Earth Sci 76:231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6547-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khwaja AR, Singh R, Tandon SN (2001) Monitoring of Ganga water and sediments vis-a-vis tannery pollution at Kanpur (India): a case study. Environ Monit Assess 68:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumarasamy P, James RA, Dahms HU, Byeon CW, Ramesh R (2014) Multivariate water quality assessment from the Tamiraparani River basin, Southern India. Environ Earth Sci 71:2441–2451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu S, Lou S, Kuang C, Huang W, Chen W, Zhang J, Zhong G (2011) Water quality assessment by pollution-index method in the coastal waters of Hebei Province in western Bohai Sea, China. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2220–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maiti SK (2001) Handbook of methods in environmental studies: vol 1: water and wastewater analysis. ABD Publishers, JaipurGoogle Scholar
  21. Michalopoulos P, Aller RC (2004) Early diagenesis of biogenic silica in the Amazon delta: alteration, authigenic clay formation and storage. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:1061–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitra A, Chowdhury R, Banerjee K (2012) Concentrations of some heavy metals in commercially important finfish and shellfish of the River Ganga. Environ Monit Assess 184:2219–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muangthong S, Shrestha S (2015) Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: case study of the Nampong River and Songkhram River, Thailand. Environ Monit Assess 187:548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicholas DD, Nason A (1957) Determination of nitrate and nitrite. Methods Enzymol 3:981–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ochs CA, Pongruktham O, Zimba PV (2013) Darkness at the break of noon: phytoplankton production in the Lower Mississippi River. Limnol Oceanogr 58:555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Onderka M, Wrede S, Rodný M, Pfister L, Hoffmann L, Krein A (2012) Hydrogeologic and landscape controls of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved silica (DSi) fluxes in heterogeneous catchments. J Hydrol 450:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pandey J, Yadav A (2017) Alternative alert system for Ganga River eutrophication using alkaline phosphatase as a level determinant. Ecol Indic 82:327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pandey J, Pandey U, Singh AV (2014) Impact of changing atmospheric deposition chemistry on carbon and nutrient loading to Ganga River: integrating land-atmosphere-water components to uncover cross domain carbon linkages. Biogeochemistry 119:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pandey U, Pandey J, Singh AV, Mishra A (2017) Anthropogenic drivers shift diatom dominance-diversity relationships and transparent exopolymeric particles production in River Ganga: implication for natural cleaning of river water. Curr Sci 113:954–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Park GE, Oh HN, Ahn SY (2009) Improvement of the ammonia analysis by the phenate method in water and wastewater. Bull Korean Chem Soc 30:2032–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qi W, Müller B, Pernet-Coudrier B, Singer H, Liu H, Qu J, Berg M (2014) Organic micropollutants in the Yangtze River: seasonal occurrence and annual loads. Sci Total Environ 472:789–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Razmkhah H, Abrishamchi A, Torkian A (2010) Evaluation of spatial and temporal variation in water quality by pattern recognition techniques: a case study on Jajrood River (Tehran, Iran). J Environ Manag 91:852–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roach KA, Winemiller KO, Davis SE (2014) Autochthonous production in shallow littoral zones of five floodplain rivers: effects of flow, turbidity and nutrients. Freshw Biol 59:1278–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarin MM, Krishnaswami S, Dilli K, Somayajulu BLK, Moore WS (1989) Major ion chemistry of the Ganga–Brahmaputra river system: weathering processes and fluxes to the Bay of Bengal. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 53:997–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sauer D, Saccone L, Conley DJ, Herrmann L, Sommer M (2006) Review of methodologies for extracting plant-available and amorphous Si from soils and aquatic sediments. Biogeochem 80:89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma P, Meher PK, Kumar A, Gautam YP, Mishra KP (2014) Changes in water quality index of Ganges River at different locations in Allahabad. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 3:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shen Z, Qiu J, Hong Q, Chen L (2014) Simulation of spatial and temporal distributions of non-point source pollution load in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Sci Total Environ 493:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siddiqui E, Pandey J, Pandey U (2018) The N: P: Si stoichiometry as a predictor of ecosystem health: a watershed scale study with Ganga River. Int J River Basin Manag, India.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2018.1476370 Google Scholar
  39. Sprague LA, Hirsch RM, Aulenbach BT (2011) Nitrate in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 1980 to 2008: are we making progress? Environ Sci Technol 45:7209–7216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Srivastava PK, Mukherjee S, Gupta M, Singh SK (2011) Characterizing monsoonal variation on water quality index of River Mahi in India using geographical information system. Water Qual Expo Health 2:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun W, Xia C, Xu M, Guo J, Sun G (2016) Application of modified water quality indices as indicators to assess the spatial and temporal trends of water quality in the Dongjiang River. Ecol Indic 66:306–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tare V, Yadav AVS, Bose P (2003) Analysis of photosynthetic activity in the most polluted stretch of river Ganga. Water Res 37:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wickland KP, Aiken GR, Butler K, Dornblaser MM, Spencer RG, Striegl M (2012) Biodegradability of dissolved organic carbon in the Yukon River and its tributaries: seasonality and importance of inorganic nitrogen. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 26:GBOE03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yadav A, Pandey J (2017) Contribution of point sources and non-point sources to nutrient and carbon loads and their influence on the trophic status of the Ganga River at Varanasi, India. Environ Monit Assess 189:475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou F, Huang GH, Guo H, Zhang W, Hao Z (2007) Spatio-temporal patterns and source apportionment of coastal water pollution in eastern Hong Kong. Water Res 41:3429–3439CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Limnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ganga River Ecology Research Laboratory, Environmental Science Division, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations