The income gradient and child mental health in Australia: does it vary by assessors?
In this paper, we examine the income gradient in child mental health using longitudinal data from a large, national cohort of Australian children. We contribute to the body of existing literature by: (i) investigating whether and to what extent a child’s mental health levels and their relationship to income vary when a child’s mental health is assessed by the child’s parent, the child’s teacher and the child her/himself; (ii) exploring whether the reporting differences in a child’s mental health is associated systematically with household income; and (iii) examining the child mental health gradient and the evolution of this gradient by the child’s age. We found that a child’s mental health and the income gradient vary depending on who assesses the child’s mental health (the gradient was the largest when assessed by parents and the smallest when assessed by the child). Furthermore, the magnitude of the effect of mental health and income gradient faded when we controlled for some important variables, such as maternal health.
KeywordsIncome Child mental health Children’s socio-emotional outcomes Assessors Australia Panel data
JEL ClassificationI12 I14
We greatly acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Francisco (Paco) Perales (Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland) on the initial draft of the paper. We also grateful to two anonymous referees of this journal and the participants of the 14th International Conference of Western Economic Association International for their feedback. This paper uses unit record data from Growing Up in Australia, the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. The study is conducted in partnership between the Department of Social Services (DSS), the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS), and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Appropriate ethical approval was gained during the study. The findings and views reported in this paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the DSS, the AIFS, or the ABS.
No financial support/fund is received to conduct this research. This is conducted as part of our regular service.
- 1.AIFS (2005) Longitudinal study of Australian children data user guide. Australian institute of family studiesGoogle Scholar
- 5.Burgess, S., Greaves, E.: Test scores, subjective assessment, and stereotyping of ethnic minorities. J. Labor Econ. 31, 535–576 (2013)Google Scholar
- 8.Cornaglia, F., Crivellaro, E., McNally, S.: Mental health and education decisions. Labour Economics 33, 1–12 (2015)Google Scholar
- 19.Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., Meltzer, H.: Using the strengths and difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. British J Psychiatry 177(6), 534–539 (2000)Google Scholar
- 20.Gibbons, S., Chevalier, A.: Assessment and age 16+ education participation. Res. Pap. Educ. 23(2), 113–123 (2008)Google Scholar
- 21.Gregg, P., Washbrook, E., Propper, C., Burgess, S.: The effects of a mother’s return to work decision on child development in the UK. Econ J 115(501), F48–F80 (2005). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=truedb=buhAN=15806866site=ehost-live Google Scholar
- 22.Gupta, N.D., Lausten, M., Pozzoli D.: Does mother know best? Parental discrepancies in assessing child functioning. Discussion Paper Series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (2012)Google Scholar
- 24.Harvey, A.C.: Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity Econom. J. Econ. Soc. 44(3), 461–465 (1976)Google Scholar
- 26.Johnston, D., Propper, C., Pudney, S., Shields, M.: The income gradient in childhood mental health: all in the eye of the beholder? J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 177(4), 807–827 (2014)Google Scholar
- 30.Kessler, R.C., Green, J.G., Gruber, M.J., Sampson, N.A., Bromet, E., Cuitan, M., Furukawa, T.A., Gureje, O., Hinkov, H., Hu, C.-H., Lara, C., Lee, S., Mneimneh, Z., Myer, L., Oakley-Browne, M., Posada-Villa, J., Sagar, R., Viana, M.C., Zaslavsky, A.M.: Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 20(1), 62–62 (2011)Google Scholar
- 35.Nghiem, H.S., Nguyen, H.T., Khanam, R., Connelly, L.B.: Does school type affect cognitive and non-cognitive development in children? Evidence from Australian primary schools. Labour Econ 33, 55–65 (2015)Google Scholar
- 36.Papageorgiou, V., Kalyva, E., Dafoulis, V., Vostanis, P.: Differences in parents’ and teachers’ ratings of ADHD symptoms and other mental health problems. European J Psychiatry 22(4), 200–210 (2008)Google Scholar
- 41.Richards. M., Abbott, R.: Childhood mental health and life chances in post-war Britain. Centre. Mental. Health. (2009) Retrieved from https://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=504de714-4a87-4c61-84a1-31d3acb16c0c
- 42.Soloff, C., Lawrence, D., Johnstone, R.: LSAC technical paper no. 1: sample design. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies (2005)Google Scholar
- 43.Strohschein, L.: Parental divorce and child mental health trajectories. J Marriage Fam 67(5), 1286–1300 (2005)Google Scholar