Moral hazard under zero price policy: evidence from Japanese long-term care claims data
We evaluate the presence and magnitude of moral hazard in Japan’s public long-term care insurance (LTCI) market. Using monthly LTCI claim records from January 2006 to December 2015 linked to concurrent death records, we construct a sample by propensity score matching insured individuals who co-pay 10% of their fees to those with no required copayments, and we implement fixed-effect estimations. We find that a ten-percentage-point reduction in the copayment rate increases monthly costs by 10.2 thousand yen, corresponding to a price elasticity of about − 0.1. Insured individuals with no copayments tend to use more services and have more utilization days than those with copayments do. Furthermore, we find that insured individuals who die from cerebral (myocardial) infarction increase their service use more in response to a reduction in the copayment rate than those who die from senility do, indicating a positive association between ex-ante health risks and ex-post service use. We verify that a cost-sharing adjustment is a valid solution for soaring LTCI expenditures. These findings could provide broad implications for the rapidly aging world.
KeywordsMoral hazard Public long-term care insurance Propensity score matching Ex-ante health risk Japan
JEL ClassificationI18 I13 I10
This study is financially supported by several funds: the Waseda University Research Initiative entitled “Empirical and theoretical research for social welfare in sustainable society- Inheritance of human capital beyond ‘an individual’ and ‘a generation’”—(PI: Haruko Noguchi); a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Project funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW): “Effects of the prevention policy of lifestyle-related disease on labor productivity and the macroeconomy from the viewpoint of cost-effective analysis” (PI: Haruko Noguchi); a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C) funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS): “Change and disparity in accessibility to long-term care services: Evidence from Japanese big data analyses” (PI: Akira Kawamura); and a Grant-in-Aid for Stat-up funded by JSPS: “The effect of the 2006 long-term care insurance amendment on cost containment: empirical evidence from nationally representative claims data.” (PI: Rong Fu). This study has received official approval for the use of secondary data from the Statistics and Information Department of the MHLW under Tohatsu-0507-3 as of May 7, 2018. We greatly appreciate Dr. Michihito Ando for his helpful comments at the Japan Economic Association 2018 Spring Meeting. Our thanks also go to participants in the European Health Economics Association at Maastricht, The Netherlands, in July 2018 for their valuable suggestions. In addition, we deeply appreciate the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions on this study. The views and opinions expressed in this article by the independent authors are provided in their personal capacity and are their sole responsibility.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Braun, R., Kopecky, K.A., Koreshkova, T.: Old, frail, and uninsured: Accounting for puzzles in the US long-term care insurance market. FRB Atlanta Working Paper No. 2017-3 (2017). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2940588. Accessed 4 Dec 2018
- 9.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Long-Term Care Insurance System of Japan (2016). http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2018
- 10.National Health Policy Forum: The Basics: National Spending for Long-Term Services and Supports (2014). http://www.nhpf.org/library/the-basics/Basics_LTSS_03-27-14.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017
- 12.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Handbook of Health and Welfare Statistics 2016 (2016). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hh/5-1.html. Accessed 5 July 2018
- 19.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Textbook for long-term care investigators. (in Japanese) (2018). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-12300000-Roukenkyoku/0000077237.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2018
- 23.Manning, W.G., Newhouse, J.P., Duan, N., Keeler, E.B., Leibowitz, A.: Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 1, 251–277 (1987)Google Scholar
- 24.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Current Situation of Public Assistance. (in Japanese) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingikai-12601000-Seisakutoukatsukan-Sanjikanshitsu_Shakaihoshoutantou/0000164401.pdf (2017). Accessed 4 Dec 2018
- 25.Rosenbaum, P.R.: The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. J. R. Stat. Soc. 147, 656–666 (1984)Google Scholar
- 34.National Federation of Health Insurance Societies: Report of Public Awareness Investigation about the Healthcare and Long-term Care. https://www.kenporen.com/include/press/2017/20170925_8.pdf (2017). Accessed 7 Dec 2018
- 36.Hiltunen, S., Putaala, J., Haapaniemi, E., Tatlisumak, T.: Long-term outcome after cerebral venous thrombosis: analysis of functional and vocational outcome, residual symptoms, and adverse events in 161 patients. J. Neurol. 263, 477–484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7996-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar