Advertisement

The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 675–686 | Cite as

Chilean population norms derived from the health-related quality of Life SF-6D

  • Miguel A. Garcia-Gordillo
  • Daniel Collado-Mateo
  • Pedro R. Olivares
  • José C. Adsuar
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

The Health-Related Quality of Life Short Form 6D (HRQoL SF-6D) provides utility values for health status. Utilities generated have a number of potentially valuable applications in economic evaluations and not only to ensure comparability between studies. Reference values can be useful to estimate the effect on patients’ HRQoL as a result of interventions in the absence of control groups. Thus, the purpose of this study was to provide normative values in the SF-6D in relation to the Chilean population.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted evaluating 5293 people. SF-6D utilities were derived from the SF-12 questions.

Results

Mean SF-6D utility index for the whole sample was 0.74. It was better for men (0.78) than for women (0.71). The ceiling effect was much higher for men (11.16%) than for women (5.31%). Women were more likely to show problems in any dimension than were men.

Conclusions

Chilean population norms for the SF-6D help in the decision-making process around health policies. Men reported higher health status than women in all subcategories analyzed. Likewise, men also reported higher scores than women in overall SF-6D dimensions.

Keywords

Reference values HRQoL Utility Health 

JEL Classification

I: I1 I10 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author DCM is supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (FPU14/01,283). He was previously supported by a Predoctoral Fellowship from the Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenberg, D., Pliskin, J.S.: Preference-based outcome measures in cost-utility analyses. A 20-year overview. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 18(3), 461–466 (2002)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garcia-Gordillo MA, Adsuar JC, Olivares PR.: Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, R., Church, J., van den Berg, B., Goodall, S.: Australian health-related quality of life population norms derived from the SF-6D. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 37(1), 17–23 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garcia-Gordillo, M.A., Collado-Mateo, D., Olivares, P.R., Adsuar, J.C.: Datos normativos del cuestionario SF-6D en pacientes diabéticos chilenos. Nutr. Hosp. 32(n06), 2665–2673 (2015)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saleem, F., Hassali, M.A., Shafie, A.A.: A cross-sectional assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among hypertensive patients in Pakistan. Health Expect. 17(3), 388–395 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berg, B.: Sf-6d population norms. Health Econ. 21(12), 1508–1512 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hawthorne, G., Osborne, R.: Population norms and meaningful differences for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) measure. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 29(2), 136–142 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kendall, P.C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S.R., Sheldrick, R.C.: Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67(3), 285–299 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kendall, P.C.G.W.: Normative comparisons in therapy outcome. Behav. Assess. 10(2), 147–158 (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Snyder, C.F., Aaronson, N.K., Choucair, A.K., Elliott, T.E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M.Y., et al.: Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual. Life Res. 21(8), 1305–1314 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costa-Requena, G., Gil, F.: Quality of life in the chemotherapy treatment of Spanish cancer patients: a comparison of general population norms. Psycho-Oncol. 18(10), 1053–1059 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soto Torres, M., Marquez Calderon, S., Ramos Diaz, I., Barba Chacon, A., Lopez Fernandez, F., Failde, Martinez I.: Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease compared to norms in Spanish population. Qual. Life Res. 13(8), 1401–1407 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brazier, J.E., Roberts, J.: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med. Care 42(9), 851–859 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rasanen, P., Roine, E., Sintonen, H., Semberg-Konttinen, V., Ryynanen, O.P., Roine, R.: Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 22(2), 235–241 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lam, C.L., Brazier, J., McGhee, S.M.: Valuation of the SF-6D health states is feasible, acceptable, reliable, and valid in a Chinese population. Value Health 11(2), 295–303 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zarate, V., Kind, P., Valenzuela, P.: Comparison of social Eq-5d time trade-off values in chile 2008–2013: do geographical differences really matter? Value Health 18(7), A811–A812 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MINSAL DdPS, Departamento de Epidemiología epi.minsal.clGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Deverill, M.: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 21(2), 271–292 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McHorney, C.A., Tarlov, A.R.: Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 4(4), 293–307 (1995)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zarate, V., Kind, P., Valenzuela, P., Vignau, A., Olivares-Tirado, P., Munoz, A.: Social valuation of EQ-5D health states: the Chilean case. Value Health 14(8), 1135–1141 (2011)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bharmal, M., Thomas 3rd, J.: Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health 9(4), 262–271 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, J., Han, Y., Zhao, F.L., Zhou, J., Chen, Z., Sun, H.: Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12, 156 (2014)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferreira, P.L., Ferreira, L.N., Pereira, L.N.: SF-6D Portuguese population norms. Eur Journal Health Econ. 16(3), 235–241 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shiroiwa, T., Fukuda, T., Ikeda, S., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Saito, S., et al.: Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 25(3), 707–719 (2016)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ciconelli, R.M., Ferraz, M.B., Kowalski, S., Pinheiro Gda, R., Sato, E.I.: Brazilian urban population norms derived from the health-related quality of life SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 24(10), 2559–2564 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Menezes Rde, M., Andrade, M.V., Noronha, K.V., Kind, P.: EQ-5D-3L as a health measure of Brazilian adult population. Qual Life Res. 24(11), 2761–2776 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cruz, L.N., Fleck, M.P., Oliveira, M.R., Camey, S.A., Hoffmann, J.F., Bagattini, A.M., et al.: Health-related quality of life in Brazil: normative data for the SF-36 in a general population sample in the south of the country. Ciencia saude coletiva. 18(7), 1911–1921 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramirez-Velez, R., Agredo-Zuniga, R.A., Jerez-Valderrama, A.M.: The reliability of preliminary normative values from the short form health survey (SF-12) questionnaire regarding Colombian adults. Revista de salud publica. 12(5), 807–819 (2010)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toghianifar, N., Najafian, J., Pooya, A., Rabiei, K., Eshrati, B., Anaraki, J., et al.: Association of smoking status with quality of life in a cross-sectional population-based sample of Iranian adults: Isfahan Healthy Heart Program. Asia-Pacific J Public Health/Asia-Pacific Acad Consort Public Health 24(5), 786–794 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferreira, L.N., Ferreira, P.L., Pereira, L.N., Oppe, M.: EQ-5D Portuguese population norms. Qual Life Res. 23(2), 425–430 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perneger, T.V., Combescure, C., Courvoisier, D.S.: General population reference values for the French version of the EuroQol EQ-5D health utility instrument. Value Health 13(5), 631–635 (2010)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kontodimopoulos, N., Pappa, E., Niakas, D., Yfantopoulos, J., Dimitrakaki, C., Tountas, Y.: Validity of the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument in a Greek general population. Value Health 11(7), 1162–1169 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel A. Garcia-Gordillo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel Collado-Mateo
    • 3
  • Pedro R. Olivares
    • 4
    • 5
  • José C. Adsuar
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  2. 2.Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain
  3. 3.Faculty of Sport SciencesUniversity of ExtremaduraCáceresSpain
  4. 4.Instituto de Calidad de Vida, Actividad Fisica y SaludUniversidad Autonoma de ChileTalcaChile
  5. 5.Instituto Superior de Educación FísicaUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations